Who's the better choice at QB for Nebraska against Louisiana Tech, Heinrich Haarberg or Jeff Sims?
Husker Max Asked by Husker Max
9/22/2023

Who's the better choice at QB for Nebraska against Louisiana Tech, Heinrich Haarberg or Jeff Sims?

83%
Haarberg WINNER

26

17%
Sims

1

83%
Haarberg

25 Comments
Michael Hoffart
1
Michael Hoffart

He needs to start this week for sure. Make it a true competition going into Michigan and set ourselves up to win the most of our BIG10 schedule as possible.

Reply
Tim N
1
Tim N

Pretty Obvious. Great defense. He's physically crushing people. He's accurate. Takes care of the ball. Motivates team. Everyone is locked into him. I could keep going....

Reply
Mark C. Brigham
0
Mark C. Brigham

He is more consistent in his decision making.

Reply
Mike Hulinsky
0
Mike Hulinsky

Proven to take better care of football

Reply
Bill Lyons
0
Bill Lyons

i have eyes and am a sentient being

Reply
James Stiver
0
James Stiver

Seemed to have managed the last game with confidence and should get better as time goes on!

Reply
Curtis Graeve
0
Curtis Graeve

Simple. He doesn't turn it over!

Reply
Curtis Graeve
Curtis Graeve

Just a side note. Sims is a great athlete. Teach him the finer points of being a WR and let him run with them! Big Bodied receivers are always great for a QB.

Doug Einsel
0
Doug Einsel

He shows better decision making. Bigger in size. Driven to perform. Less turnovers and he has a longer future at NU.

Reply
DrHusker66
0
DrHusker66

He needs more time playing this position in game situations. I do think both should play get the rust off of Sims and give him confidence going into Michigan.

Reply
John Samson
0
John Samson

High ankle sprain versus LA Tech. If Sims is going to be Rhule's guy, he needs to be healthy for Big 10 play. Let Haarberg get the experience while Sims heals.

Reply
Robert Lloyd
0
Robert Lloyd

I love both QBs but must vote for Heinrich as he played lights out and with the so needed clean play protecting the ball. I do believe we can win also with Jeff and our players would have to just follow him looking for the ball coming loose. We can do that too. It's a team.

Reply
Ron Staebell
0
Ron Staebell

Backup QB is always the most popular player on the team, but in this case it makes sense. He's performed, Sims hasn't

Reply
Seth Hyberger
0
Seth Hyberger

Haarberg is not turnover prone.

Reply
David Noe
0
David Noe

Great applebee doesn't turn the ball over

Reply
Terry Darnall
0
Terry Darnall

He has a quarterback, mentality, poised, and decisive!

Reply
Power Glide
0
Power Glide

Harberg reminds me so much of Brooke Berringer. A journeyman QB

Reply
regan zeller
0
regan zeller

not turning to ball over is VERY important. Although HH had a couple passes that were probably ill advised we were able to come out on top.

Reply
John Whiteley
0
John Whiteley

Haarberg has the hot hand now, but won't last long if he continues to take unnecessary hits when running. They'll need both QBs throughout the season.

Reply
John Fitzgerald
0
John Fitzgerald

We need steadiness more than talent. Inconsistent play & turnovers at QB have cost us countless games 8 years+,

Reply
Thomas Duncan
0
Thomas Duncan

I would move Sims to receiver, use his skills there. Haarberg looks to be a good fit at QB and will get better with more reps.

Reply
Richard Hein
0
Richard Hein

He didn't turnover the ball

Reply
Omar Barnes
0
Omar Barnes

He is a better game manager which is what we need right now.

Reply
Linda Ogren
0
Linda Ogren

NEEDS to play better taking care football, faster, reads receivers, just what QB should be. Ron

Reply
Chad Alexander
0
Chad Alexander

SIMS IS FREAKING HORRIBLE!!

Reply

17%
Sims

1 Comment
Jim Zier
0
Jim Zier

I hit the wrong button. Wanted to vote for Harrberg,

Reply
If you could only have one pet, would it be a cat or a dog?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
970 Votes

If you could only have one pet, would it be a cat or a dog?

A cat!

5

A dog!

6

A cat!

4 Comments
Ann Harbert Evensen
1
Ann Harbert Evensen

Cats are more independent.

Reply
robert shaw
0
robert shaw

Cat's are way easier to take care of.

Reply
Heidi Owen
0
Heidi Owen

They're independant.

Reply
Khara H.
0
Khara H.

I've had cats all my life and dogs most of that time. I prefer how cats interact with their humans since they seem to be more independent. We now have Bengal kittens who come to their name, play fetch

Reply

A dog!

6 Comments
k san
0
k san

I've had and love both, but a dog would be my 1 choice.

Reply
Brad Livsey
0
Brad Livsey

Dogs dig it! Cat are indignant!

Reply
Patricia Brady-McKinney
0
Patricia Brady-McKinney

I could not live without my dogs, they are so much fun, and we do dog sports. Unconditional love and affection from them is a plus. I do love cats too, but it would have to be a dog.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

Cats are annoying

Reply
Mou Chat Reed
Mou Chat Reed

And dogs stick their noses where they don't belong and men just stand and watch their dog do it.

Teresa Raymond Tieben
0
Teresa Raymond Tieben

Dogs love unconditionally and show it all the timeand they are loyal! Cats not so much!

Reply
Should President Trump continue to pursue a United States takeover of Greenland?

Should President Trump continue to pursue a United States takeover of Greenland?

Yes

10

No

7

Yes

3 Comments
Vanessa Vaughan
0
Vanessa Vaughan

I ignored it just like Republican lawmakers ignore takkng a bigger stance on control on school shootings. All they do is give meaningless mouth service the whole time pocketing money from NRA lobbyists. I don't want to take anyone's guns from them, but our children should feel safe.

Reply
Felicia Megan
0
Felicia Megan

He needs to chill.

Reply
Max
0
Max

Trump got the deal today January 21st.. Trump helps Americans again. Daily.

Reply
Max
Max

Fred, keep reading CNN. LOL

Fred
Fred

There are two ways to be fooled: One is to believe what isn't true, and the other is to refuse to believe what is true. ― Soren Kierkegaard

No

6 Comments
Nancy Sims-VanBuren
1
Nancy Sims-VanBuren

He has us at odds with our allies, our adversaries and within our own nation due to the extreme violence with the ICE issue... civil unrest...

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

Steven Watson
1
Steven Watson

He is completely insane. He and his cabinet want the natural resources, like Venezuela oil!!!

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

Bryan Jones
1
Bryan Jones

We already have a military presence in Greenland. Denmark is a NATO ally. Trump should NOT be threatening the European balance or the time-tested established order. This has ramifications far beyond Trump's ego.

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

0571953
1
0571953

US should not invade other countries. Never Greenland or Venezuela. This is Trump enriching himself. Dangerous and destroying US reputation on human rights.

Reply
Max
Max

He didn't invade them.

Denzel McVeigh
1
Denzel McVeigh

You don't own this country and you can't own Greenland matter of fact go away you prick

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

Kevin Blount
1
Kevin Blount

We have existing agreements with Greenland and Denmark regarding military bases. We should expand on that, rather than threaten to take the entire country by force 'if necessary'

Reply
Max
Max

Trump made a deal that everyone loves. All over the EU.

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT