Who's the better choice at QB for Nebraska against Louisiana Tech, Heinrich Haarberg or Jeff Sims?
Husker Max Asked by Husker Max
9/22/2023

Who's the better choice at QB for Nebraska against Louisiana Tech, Heinrich Haarberg or Jeff Sims?

83%
Haarberg WINNER

26

17%
Sims

1

83%
Haarberg

25 Comments
Michael Hoffart
1
Michael Hoffart

He needs to start this week for sure. Make it a true competition going into Michigan and set ourselves up to win the most of our BIG10 schedule as possible.

Reply
Tim N
1
Tim N

Pretty Obvious. Great defense. He's physically crushing people. He's accurate. Takes care of the ball. Motivates team. Everyone is locked into him. I could keep going....

Reply
Mark C. Brigham
0
Mark C. Brigham

He is more consistent in his decision making.

Reply
Mike Hulinsky
0
Mike Hulinsky

Proven to take better care of football

Reply
Bill Lyons
0
Bill Lyons

i have eyes and am a sentient being

Reply
James Stiver
0
James Stiver

Seemed to have managed the last game with confidence and should get better as time goes on!

Reply
Curtis Graeve
0
Curtis Graeve

Simple. He doesn't turn it over!

Reply
Curtis Graeve
Curtis Graeve

Just a side note. Sims is a great athlete. Teach him the finer points of being a WR and let him run with them! Big Bodied receivers are always great for a QB.

Doug Einsel
0
Doug Einsel

He shows better decision making. Bigger in size. Driven to perform. Less turnovers and he has a longer future at NU.

Reply
DrHusker66
0
DrHusker66

He needs more time playing this position in game situations. I do think both should play get the rust off of Sims and give him confidence going into Michigan.

Reply
John Samson
0
John Samson

High ankle sprain versus LA Tech. If Sims is going to be Rhule's guy, he needs to be healthy for Big 10 play. Let Haarberg get the experience while Sims heals.

Reply
Robert Lloyd
0
Robert Lloyd

I love both QBs but must vote for Heinrich as he played lights out and with the so needed clean play protecting the ball. I do believe we can win also with Jeff and our players would have to just follow him looking for the ball coming loose. We can do that too. It's a team.

Reply
Ron Staebell
0
Ron Staebell

Backup QB is always the most popular player on the team, but in this case it makes sense. He's performed, Sims hasn't

Reply
Seth Hyberger
0
Seth Hyberger

Haarberg is not turnover prone.

Reply
David Noe
0
David Noe

Great applebee doesn't turn the ball over

Reply
Terry Darnall
0
Terry Darnall

He has a quarterback, mentality, poised, and decisive!

Reply
Power Glide
0
Power Glide

Harberg reminds me so much of Brooke Berringer. A journeyman QB

Reply
regan zeller
0
regan zeller

not turning to ball over is VERY important. Although HH had a couple passes that were probably ill advised we were able to come out on top.

Reply
John Whiteley
0
John Whiteley

Haarberg has the hot hand now, but won't last long if he continues to take unnecessary hits when running. They'll need both QBs throughout the season.

Reply
John Fitzgerald
0
John Fitzgerald

We need steadiness more than talent. Inconsistent play & turnovers at QB have cost us countless games 8 years+,

Reply
Thomas Duncan
0
Thomas Duncan

I would move Sims to receiver, use his skills there. Haarberg looks to be a good fit at QB and will get better with more reps.

Reply
Richard Hein
0
Richard Hein

He didn't turnover the ball

Reply
Omar Barnes
0
Omar Barnes

He is a better game manager which is what we need right now.

Reply
Linda Ogren
0
Linda Ogren

NEEDS to play better taking care football, faster, reads receivers, just what QB should be. Ron

Reply
Chad Alexander
0
Chad Alexander

SIMS IS FREAKING HORRIBLE!!

Reply

17%
Sims

1 Comment
Jim Zier
0
Jim Zier

I hit the wrong button. Wanted to vote for Harrberg,

Reply
Have gas prices gotten high enough to limit your driving?

Have gas prices gotten high enough to limit your driving?

Yes

2

No

7

Yes

2 Comments
Kevin Reed
0
Kevin Reed

We have to commute to work, approximately 70 miles every day. We fill up once a week, and the cost has risen from an average of $36.50 before the Iran war, to now $55.00 each week. We now have to budget more for gas than we did. And there is still nothing to show for any of this pointless conflic

Reply
Max
Max

So, you support Iran? Well, I support America.

Nikki Wrinkles
0
Nikki Wrinkles

Im driving about 81.6 miles a day to get my son to daycare and then myself to work. Car averages 21 mpg and requires minimum 91 octane fuel. $70 twice a week plus what my husband spends in fuel for just traveling back and forth to work and home. Keeping son home 2 days from daycare to save on fuel.

Reply
Harry D
Harry D

You need a more fuel-efficient car.

No

4 Comments
Matt Loganbill
2
Matt Loganbill

While no one enjoys paying more $ gas is cheap for what you get.

Reply
Harry D
2
Harry D

I wish puppet Biden did not drain the strategic petroleum reserve in a failed political scheme, much like his unconstitutional student loan forgiveness, to buy votes. The oil pipelines to Canada, that Biden stopped, would be handy about now too. Voting for future Democrats will be very limited.

Reply
Max
Max

Trump had just refilled it, after Obama drained it down to nothing.

Steve Baumann
1
Steve Baumann

Far bigger issues than fuel prices

Reply
Robert Van Vickle
0
Robert Van Vickle

Hybrid gang stay winning

Reply
Should President Trump continue to pursue a United States takeover of Greenland?

Should President Trump continue to pursue a United States takeover of Greenland?

Yes

10

No

7

Yes

3 Comments
Vanessa Vaughan
0
Vanessa Vaughan

I ignored it just like Republican lawmakers ignore takkng a bigger stance on control on school shootings. All they do is give meaningless mouth service the whole time pocketing money from NRA lobbyists. I don't want to take anyone's guns from them, but our children should feel safe.

Reply
Felicia Megan
0
Felicia Megan

He needs to chill.

Reply
Max
0
Max

Trump got the deal today January 21st.. Trump helps Americans again. Daily.

Reply
Max
Max

Fred, keep reading CNN. LOL

Fred
Fred

There are two ways to be fooled: One is to believe what isn't true, and the other is to refuse to believe what is true. ― Soren Kierkegaard

No

6 Comments
Nancy Sims-VanBuren
1
Nancy Sims-VanBuren

He has us at odds with our allies, our adversaries and within our own nation due to the extreme violence with the ICE issue... civil unrest...

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

Steven Watson
1
Steven Watson

He is completely insane. He and his cabinet want the natural resources, like Venezuela oil!!!

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

Bryan Jones
1
Bryan Jones

We already have a military presence in Greenland. Denmark is a NATO ally. Trump should NOT be threatening the European balance or the time-tested established order. This has ramifications far beyond Trump's ego.

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

0571953
1
0571953

US should not invade other countries. Never Greenland or Venezuela. This is Trump enriching himself. Dangerous and destroying US reputation on human rights.

Reply
Max
Max

He didn't invade them.

Denzel McVeigh
1
Denzel McVeigh

You don't own this country and you can't own Greenland matter of fact go away you prick

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

Kevin Blount
1
Kevin Blount

We have existing agreements with Greenland and Denmark regarding military bases. We should expand on that, rather than threaten to take the entire country by force 'if necessary'

Reply
Max
Max

Trump made a deal that everyone loves. All over the EU.

Who to Follow
KTVZ

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT