Popular SquareOffs

Yes, too expensive!

3

No, I'll just pay!

2

Yes, too expensive!

Leslie Ann
0
Leslie Ann

I'll go homeless before I give up my pet. He's part of the family and we'll behaved.

Reply
Pam W
0
Pam W

They raised rent and many struggle with it and now they want pet rent. THAT is just being greedy. Pet deposit is all they need. Otherwise it is just being ridiculous. Pets do not have income.

Reply
Custom Canes
0
Custom Canes

Wheres the maybe. I hear about fixing the homeless situation i am now homeless cant afford rent plus its not just 50$ for pet rent its 50 per pet per mounth thats an extra 200 a month

Reply

No, I'll just pay!

Ka San
1
Ka San

Absolutely not! Our pets are family. I can understand a rent deposit for a pet to cover any damage, but not extra rent on top of a deposit!

Reply
Brandy Barr
0
Brandy Barr

NO ABSOLUTELY NOT! WE HAVE 2 FUR-BABIES AND THEY ARE PART OF OUR FAMILY! THAT'S WHY WE HAVE DECIDED TO LIVE IN OUR CAMP TRAILER INSTEAD OF DEALING WITH RENTING AN APARTMENT!

Reply

Candy corn?

1

Peanut butter kisses?

2

Candy corn?

Peanut butter kisses?

Kandy Lou K
1
Kandy Lou K

Their terrible. Stick to your teeth!

Reply
Braden
0
Braden

Candy Corn is iconic, so it has to stay. Totally, I agree for kicking out peanut butter kisses!

Reply

Yes

1

No

8

Yes

Jeff Chick
3
Jeff Chick

Because I don't want kids in elementary school concerned with sex. They need to focus on learning more important subjects. A child in kindergarten dosen't need to know about oral sex, anal sex or masterbation.

Reply

No

Sally bell
2
Sally bell

Hitler,and slave owners were also against books,and minorities/women being educated. They were more desirable. Meaning they were to dumb to know when someone was pissing on them and telling them it's raining. I guess that's why Donald Trump said he LOVES the uneducated. And, President LBJ said give

Reply
Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

LBJ also said; “I'll have those ------- voting Democrat for the next 200 years.” ― Lyndon B. Johnson---- LBJ used people, he didn't love people.

Toasty
1
Toasty

Wasn't that long ago the liberals/socialist wanted to ban Mark Twain books due to their interpretation of 'racism'. Its not OK when they do it, not OK when 'our side' does it. Protecting your kids starts with you, not banning books.

Reply
Max DeYoung
1
Max DeYoung

I support efforts to remove the people. that put filth in school libraries.

Reply
Kelly Branstetter
0
Kelly Branstetter

Is this the land of the free or a Country controlled by a dictator called the GOP that keeps taking or attempting to take rights from certain citizens?

Reply
Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

Joe is the dictator.

Who to Follow

About Popular

The most-debated questions across SquareOffs. Vote, defend your side, and see what people really think.

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT