Should The Flash have been a stand alone film instead of relying on Michael Keaton's Batman?

Asked by Geekvolution

521 Votes

Should The Flash have been a stand alone film instead of relying on Michael Keaton's Batman?

55%

Yes- Batman 89 seems like a gimmick Yes- Batman 89 seems like a gimmick

45%

No- It can't stand on its own No- It can't stand on its own

55%

Yes- Batman 89 seems like a gimmick

3 Comments

Spencer Nielsen

Everything about this production is backwards and wrong-headed. Including Keaton is the rotten cherry on top.

Rikard Andersson

As much as I like Michael Keaton, having to cram in his Batman just shows Warner has no confidence in their movie Cheap fanservice and marketing ploy The Flash movie should be about The Flash

Mutale Mwananshiku

Yes cause the only reason people are interested in this movie is because of keaton coming back not because of millers flash.

45%

No- It can't stand on its own

4 Comments

whoaly

I'll echo some folks in saying if it were not for 89 Batman returning, I'd be much less excited about this film. Instantly goes from a maybe I'll catch it on Netflix to day 1 in theatres.. Alternatively, they could have just made a Crisis/multiverse film and I would have watched it for Keaton.

Chewbaacca's Lover

Ezra Miller is annoying, Keaton Batman is the only reason I will even watch it.

Rikard Andersson

But do you HAVE TO watch the movie then? Michael Keaton can't compensate for a bad The Flash movie since it should be about The Flash

Rikard Andersson

Then the better option would have been to recast The Flash

Unknown Passenger

For the mere fact that I can't stand Ezra Miller's Flash.

Andrew Cozzini

1.) The multiversal twists will help to differiate it from the now definitive CW Flash. 2.) This Flash actually had (imo) great chemistry with his Batman (Affleck), so pairing him with another makes some sense. 3.) Audiences were not sold on Miller's Flash, so Keaton will likely drive ticket sales.

Would Sonic the Hedgehog 3 perform fine without Jim Carrey if he decides not to do it?

Asked by Geekvolution

229 Votes

Would Sonic the Hedgehog 3 perform fine without Jim Carrey if he decides not to do it?

46%

Yes-- the franchise has legs without him Yes-- the franchise has legs without him

54%

No-- he's necessary to its success No-- he's necessary to its success

46%

Yes-- the franchise has legs without him

1 Comment

DIMWITMONKEY

Jim Carry's performance is only one of the many positives of both films. It may not be AS good or enjoyable, but the Sonic films have shown to be better than they have any right to be outside of Carry's performance. It would be a great time to introduce characters that have yet to make an appearance

54%

No-- he's necessary to its success

1 Comment

Colin Carroll

he is a legend he makes the movie

Should the next on screen Wolverine be short and scrappy like he is in the comics?

Asked by Geekvolution

162 Votes

Should the next on screen Wolverine be short and scrappy like he is in the comics?

80%

Yes, that would set him apart Yes, that would set him apart

20%

No, general audiences won't accept it No, general audiences won't accept it

80%

Yes, that would set him apart

1 Comment

Andrew Cozzini

While I certainly can appreciate a comic-accurate build for Logan this time 'round, personally, I'm more hopeful he suits up in a form of his traditional uniform, cowl and all! IMO, that would instantly separate this new version from Jackman's, regardless of his relative height to his predecessor.

20%

No, general audiences won't accept it

0 Comment

No one has commented yet

Geekvolution

Should The Flash have been a stand alone film instead of relying on Michael Keaton's Batman?

55% Yes- Batman 89 seems like a gimmick Yes- Batman 89 seems like a gimmick

45% No- It can't stand on its own No- It can't stand on its own

55% Yes- Batman 89 seems like a gimmick

45% No- It can't stand on its own

Would Sonic the Hedgehog 3 perform fine without Jim Carrey if he decides not to do it?

46% Yes-- the franchise has legs without him Yes-- the franchise has legs without him

54% No-- he's necessary to its success No-- he's necessary to its success

46% Yes-- the franchise has legs without him

54% No-- he's necessary to its success

Should the next on screen Wolverine be short and scrappy like he is in the comics?

80% Yes, that would set him apart Yes, that would set him apart

20% No, general audiences won't accept it No, general audiences won't accept it

80% Yes, that would set him apart

20% No, general audiences won't accept it

55%

Yes- Batman 89 seems like a gimmick Yes- Batman 89 seems like a gimmick

45%

No- It can't stand on its own No- It can't stand on its own

55%

Yes- Batman 89 seems like a gimmick

45%

No- It can't stand on its own

46%

Yes-- the franchise has legs without him Yes-- the franchise has legs without him

54%

No-- he's necessary to its success No-- he's necessary to its success

46%

Yes-- the franchise has legs without him

54%

No-- he's necessary to its success

80%

Yes, that would set him apart Yes, that would set him apart

20%

No, general audiences won't accept it No, general audiences won't accept it

80%

Yes, that would set him apart

20%

No, general audiences won't accept it