Is Pat Bev out of line saying LeBron is “no challenge” to guard?
2202 8
Is Pat Bev out of line saying LeBron is “no challenge” to guard?
Devlin Patrick
Asked By
Devlin Patrick
Who's side are you on in Scarlett Johannsson's lawsuit against Disney about Black Widow streaming?
7287 72
Who's side are you on in Scarlett Johannsson's lawsuit against...
Dennis Coles
Asked By
Dennis Coles
Should there be a ban on assault rifles?
983 30
Should there be a ban on assault rifles?
KTVZ
Asked By
KTVZ
Who’s the tougher defender?
3914 3
Who’s the tougher defender?
Tucker Newkirk
Asked By
Tucker Newkirk
Which video game movie did you like better:  Free Guy or Ready Player 1?
487 1
Which video game movie did you like better: Free Guy or Ready...
Kevin Klein
Asked By
Kevin Klein
Do you think President Biden should cancel student loan debt?
148 4
Do you think President Biden should cancel student loan debt?
News-Press Now
Asked By
News-Press Now
Do you think Doctor Strange In the Multiverse of Madness is a good sequel to Doctor Strange (2016)?
48 7
Do you think Doctor Strange In the Multiverse of Madness is a ...
Geekvolution
Asked By
Geekvolution
Who's the real GOAT?
2858 4
Who's the real GOAT?
Tucker Newkirk
Asked By
Tucker Newkirk
Should Donald Trump be allowed back on Twitter?
450 19
Should Donald Trump be allowed back on Twitter?
ABC 17 News
Asked By
ABC 17 News
Do you think students should learn about bias in school?
1923 17
Do you think students should learn about bias in school?
KTVZ
Asked By
KTVZ
Do You Want to See a Standalone Hulk Film?
5255 16
Do You Want to See a Standalone Hulk Film?
Waira
Asked By
Waira
Who did you like better as Batman?
7 1
Who did you like better as Batman?
Kevin Klein
Asked By
Kevin Klein
Who has the best handles in the NBA?
16422 140
Who has the best handles in the NBA?
ImDominus
Asked By
ImDominus
Can anyone ever fill the shoes of Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine? Who?
2562 7
Can anyone ever fill the shoes of Hugh Jackman’s Wolverine? Who?
Jody's Corner
Asked By
Jody's Corner
Does road construction make you avoid businesses in that area?
508 3
Does road construction make you avoid businesses in that area?
KTVZ
Asked By
KTVZ
Is Pat Bev out of line saying LeBron is “no challenge” to guard?

Is Pat Bev out of line saying LeBron is “no challenge” to guard?

OF COURSE!

5

NO WAY!

3

OF COURSE!

5 Comments
Francis Dudum
1
Francis Dudum

LeBron is the best of all time

Reply
Bernardo Parral
0
Bernardo Parral

LeBron is the GOAT,nobody can guard him except Luka, maybe Zion and maybe KD

Reply
Leon Howard
0
Leon Howard

wdf first off lebron is considered obeast and pat couldnt even guard durant in last years first round so aint no damn way he’ll be able to guard lebron.

Reply
Keith Rollins
0
Keith Rollins

Yeah of course he’s out of line what fool would say Lebron is not hard to guard I wish he say that when he’s under the paint and sees Lebron flying over his head

Reply

NO WAY!

3 Comments
Matthew Jackson
0
Matthew Jackson

He locked him up Also no trash talk is out of line

Reply
Emmet O'Brien
0
Emmet O'Brien

Pat Bev can guard anyone

Reply
Leon Howard
Leon Howard

Well tell that to durant who destroyed him and nearly averaged 30 that playoff matchup last year🤔

Who's side are you on in Scarlett Johannsson's lawsuit against Disney about Black Widow streaming?

Who's side are you on in Scarlett Johannsson's lawsuit against Disney about Black Widow streaming?

Scarlett

70

Disney

2

Scarlett

70 Comments
Brian Klein
7
Brian Klein

It's my understanding that her pay was based on ticket sales, so if she feels shorted due to people streaming vs. going into the theater, Disney should pony up some money for her.

Reply
Fiorella
4
Fiorella

She has the right to get that money and Disney broke a pretty strong bond between them

Reply
madison taylor
3
madison taylor

Scarlett was totally underpaid for the movie. Her acting was amazing, and she played the role perfectly. Disney did not pay her fairly, especially because this was her sendoff from Marvel.

Reply
Tyler Kupfer
2
Tyler Kupfer

Disney took advantage of their actors through a minor loophole in the contract (the success of Disney+ had not been anticipated when the contract was signed), and if the real reason that Black Widow was on Disney+ early was COVID then it would have cost the same as theater tickets, not 3x more.

Reply
Juan Hernandez
1
Juan Hernandez

I believe she’s worked hard and deserves a good pay

Reply
Gagnon Fabien
Gagnon Fabien

yes, She's

Rosalie Hetrick
1
Rosalie Hetrick

For me it's not about the money. It's about disney breaking her contract. I feel that she's sueing because she's so big she can totally afford it but the smaller actors and actresses can't. I think she's doing it so they can't get away with doing it to smaller people.

Reply
Pamela S
1
Pamela S

Because they screwed her by releasing it that way. Theaters first, let it run, then tv. It's the way it's always been done, except when you're trying to screw over your top talent.

Reply
Callie Nicewonger
1
Callie Nicewonger

because it wasn’t in her contract and she lost like 50 mil or something from them premiering it on Disney plus at the same time as in theaters. Plus she waited over a decade for her characters movie just for some shitty stuff like this to happen. I’m 100% on scarletts side no doubt.

Reply
Max
0
Max

Disney is evil child groomers.

Reply
Ruby I. Hadani
0
Ruby I. Hadani

There’s lots of stars that Disney has done this to

Reply
Meriyen Guerra
0
Meriyen Guerra

The breach of the contract and they must pay her. Plus, this wouldn't be an issue if she were a man!

Reply
oddboy77
0
oddboy77

because these people aren't getting what they deserve for these roles not even the behind the scenes people

Reply
Calvin Broadus
0
Calvin Broadus

Disney knows they handled this wrong

Reply
Jasmine Cephas LuthorLaufeyson
0
Jasmine Cephas LuthorLaufeyson

They didnt give her money for a movie she has been with for 12 years and let's act like disney isnt known for doing this a lot or stealing from smaller corporations

Reply
William Lloyd Scott
0
William Lloyd Scott

Think David v' Goliath,...actors within a mega franchise as Marvel, regardless of theater door ticket sales still need to get paid amicably....DO THE RIGHT THING!!!! Karma is a bitch!

Reply
Alejandro Bustamante
0
Alejandro Bustamante

Team Scarlett because she got under paid, breached contract, and lots of people don’t like black widow. But I’m here to say I am a black widow fan I like her and she sacrificed herself to save half the universe. And did not even get a funeral scene in endgame. How disappointing

Reply
CobraKai1972
0
CobraKai1972

Cause she’s my wife

Reply
Laci_LuLu
0
Laci_LuLu

ScarJo was screwed over. She deserves as much respect and money as the male Avengers did. Not her fault a pandemic hit.

Reply
Anna Meyer
0
Anna Meyer

Because she’s has the right and they should have talked to her about their idea but Disney was a little right but Scarlett.

Reply
spider man
0
spider man

Disney is a huge company who abuses their workers and is trying to monopolize the film industry, I will never be on their side. Also, IATSE is going on strike right now against streaming services, it’s a problem in the industry in general. Johansson is in the right.

Reply
Toni Faith
0
Toni Faith

First off, she gave them the option the redeem themselves and keep it silent. She just wanted her rightful earnings. But NO INSTEAD Disney decided to just push it off as if a women as powerful as her wouldn’t come back at them. 60 million is NOTHING to Disney. And you guys couldn’t? Shame.

Reply
Michael Martinez
0
Michael Martinez

Disney didn’t specify that the movie would premiere simultaneously on streaming, thereby severely limiting the box office draw

Reply
Scott Farmer
0
Scott Farmer

Because Disney needs to be brought down some. They cheated Scarlett and she deserves the money.

Reply
Domonique Jackson
0
Domonique Jackson

Disney went against her contract and made her loose millions and got mad at her for getting mad at loosing money and decided to ban her from future projects

Reply
izzy scienski
0
izzy scienski

She has the right to get that money and Disney broke a pretty strong bond between them

Reply
Robert Zavala
0
Robert Zavala

Disney back-doored her by releasing it on demand due to Covid and not giving her a percentage. Should have cut her in or delayed the release as Tom Cruise did with his last 2 movies.

Reply
Ray Plasse
0
Ray Plasse

Because the studios have consistently tried to screw all their employees. Only a union can stop the abuse.

Reply
Dangle Durand
0
Dangle Durand

As a few have said, if her contract was to include ticket sales and Disney decided to stream it for extra cash, theg owe her some of that income too

Reply
Sophie Lee
0
Sophie Lee

it’s simple they breeches her contract there is no two ways around it

Reply
matt gee
0
matt gee

Well look at Shang chi? Lesser movie that is killing it because they didn’t stream it

Reply
Jeffrey Hartzell
0
Jeffrey Hartzell

Disney breached contract, period.

Reply
illuminatedi
0
illuminatedi

i vouch for scarlett, shes dedicated 10+ years building this hero, disney will make trillions in the coming decades which she helped with some millions, she's no different than the other amazing cast members, she should be treated equally.

Reply
Lauren Cook
0
Lauren Cook

They broke a contract regardless if she’s rich or not they screwed her out of a shit ton of money.

Reply
Alyssa Calfee
0
Alyssa Calfee

Her pay was based on ticket sale and disney+ shorten it without consent.

Reply
A Norfleet
0
A Norfleet

Because the broke the contract and she was the executive producer for that film which mean she put in her own money to see the project through, only for her to cheat her out of her money.!

Reply
Tai Allen
0
Tai Allen

They should have asked for her approval.

Reply
Peter Rapiejko
0
Peter Rapiejko

Disney did not keep to their end of the contract! Therefore, any lawyer or judge would agree that Scarlett Johansson deserves to win this case!

Reply
Juan Carlos Garcia
0
Juan Carlos Garcia

I dislike big corporation's that bullies women and don't give credit or take advantage of women who they employ basically those who think that having power and wealth can abuse others and mistreat them she's an amazing actress and a wonderful human being love her

Reply
Matthew J Opdyke | Sci-Fi & Fantasy Author
0
Matthew J Opdyke | Sci-Fi & Fantasy Author

In an environment where COVID is a concern for people at high-risk, it would make sense for Disney to generously pay Scarlett for streaming revenues. She upped Marvel value by billions and was very dedicated every step of the way. Common Disney, show a little heart.

Reply
Michelle
0
Michelle

They could have done exactly what they are doing for Shang Chi or renegotiated the contract. Instead, her reps were stonewalled, the box office tanked due to pirating, and she lost a fortune. Also, it's a known fact that China will not show movies from other countries in July.

Reply
Kyle King
0
Kyle King

Disney should have included streaming in her cut. The should of updated her contract before they released. Disney has a long history of doing people wrong.

Reply
Londyn Wilkerson
0
Londyn Wilkerson

Because they had no right to do what they did she deserves everything 😀

Reply
Kathy Phillips
0
Kathy Phillips

Pay artists for their work.

Reply
Alessio Pasquali
0
Alessio Pasquali

I want theatrical windows to be what Disney goes back to moving forward.

Reply
Rebecca Lanfrit
0
Rebecca Lanfrit

Movie should’nt have been streamed while in theaters!!

Reply
ꜱᴛᴇꜰᴀɴɴʏ ʟᴇᴜɴɢ ʏᴜ
0
ꜱᴛᴇꜰᴀɴɴʏ ʟᴇᴜɴɢ ʏᴜ

Violating the contract is against the law. Under the law, once a contract is breached, the guilty party, Disney, must remedy the breach.

Reply
Corey Wilson
0
Corey Wilson

Because they broke the contract rules about her movie not being on Disney+

Reply
Amanda Allen
0
Amanda Allen

They had a contract, it was for theatrical release and that's their base pay. Not just hers they've to pay EVERYONE involved in the movie and making of the movie. By releasing to Disney premiere they lost what they earned. Disney should fork over profits Disney should wait a mont to release any film

Reply
Maggie Y
0
Maggie Y

Honestly it's more the principle than the money. Disney is trying to portray her as money-hungry when in fact the opposite is true. Disney is being a bully.

Reply
Dw Ads
0
Dw Ads

Disney needs to remember who & how they got to where they are at. W/O these people, they have a challenging product. Plus, a contract is only as good as it is honored by both parties. Disney has not lived up to their end of the contract but belittling Scarlett & saying it is because of COVID-19 😔

Reply
JC Satterwhite
0
JC Satterwhite

Because they are contractually obligated to stick with the agreement stated. Period

Reply
xMarvel Fanx
0
xMarvel Fanx

They had an agreement about what was supposed to happen and Disney didn’t hold up their end of the deal- Scarlett deserves the money

Reply
Pam Saxton
0
Pam Saxton

Disney broke their contract with her and cost the entire cast lots of income and they refused to renegotiate. Disney took advantage of the covid situation unfairly.

Reply
Grace Stephens
0
Grace Stephens

She deserves the money 💯 percent and I think it’s absolutely outrageous that Disney isn’t paying her the amount she requires. It’s disgusting how Disney treats women and I think she hasn’t gotten enough credit for her incredibly amazing acting skills and she’s just awesome! SHE DESERVES THE MONEY!

Reply
N
0
N

It was in her contracts that the movie would have only a theatrical release. Disney didn’t honor that so she has the right to sue. Not to mention how poorly Disney has been treating this whole thing. Scarlett’s in the right.

Reply
Victor Acosta
0
Victor Acosta

Disney is evil incarnate

Reply
EJ Manalo
0
EJ Manalo

It’s her right to file a lawsuit against Disney and all. Sure, the new movie, “Black Widow” wasn’t as successful as you guys think it is, but it is a good movie! Scarlett Johansson deserves better, and we’ll always be there for her and to support her throughout her journey! Best of luck to Scarlett!

Reply
Lionel Walker
0
Lionel Walker

I respect SJ because she's a powerful woman figure. All those fake Disney Princess skanks get way more respect and aren't even real

Reply
Loki Odinson
0
Loki Odinson

Disney straight up lied & breached the Contract they made with her.When they released BW on Disney+!!!

Reply
Inester Dawson
0
Inester Dawson

Disney don't know how to work on marvel movies they messing them up thats why sonys don't want to do another spider-man movie with them hobos they should stick to they're own tv shows and movies of there own stop messing with Scarlett Johansson Disney matafact marvel stop dealing with Disney they su

Reply
Inester Dawson
Inester Dawson

Sorry about the su i meant stop it Disney and stop making marvel movies i meant

Demond Nelson Hooper
0
Demond Nelson Hooper

She made her character in the marvel movies

Reply
jamez Senese
0
jamez Senese

If it was a man they would get paid in full amount

Reply
Cyndy Sandoval
0
Cyndy Sandoval

Because disney did her wrong.

Reply
Kayla Woods
0
Kayla Woods

I voted for Scarlett because, it’s her own movie thats about her, especially since she’s not getting paid enough, and since Disney+ released it, she won’t make as much, because when people go to the cinemas to see the movie she would make more in box office.

Reply
Patrick Stewart
0
Patrick Stewart

Legal precedent has already been set with Gal Godot and others where contracts were correctly and ethically updated to increase their income due to lost ticket sales vs simultaneous streaming. Disney didn’t even try to renegotiate in good faith. ScarJo income was based of ticket sales. Hope she wins

Reply
Waira
0
Waira

I feel like a large condition of her being willing to costar in so many films was that she would eventually get a standalone film and be able to reap the benefits of the box office as a lead. I hope she gets what she deserves.

Reply

Disney

2 Comments
Trevor Thomas
0
Trevor Thomas

I choose Disney because people at home who are positive of Covid-19 and they can't go anywhere and movie theater for two weeks. Kevin Feige and Scarlett Johansson are a big mistake and they haven't thought about other people who are stayed at home from positive Covid-19 in two weeks.

Reply
Sofia
Sofia

She was suppose to get paid for the movie on Disney+ but did not.

Erin Reilly
0
Erin Reilly

Because I love Disney

Reply
Should there be a ban on assault rifles?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
983 Votes

Should there be a ban on assault rifles?

Yes, we should ban them!

15

No, we shouldn't ban them!

15

Yes, we should ban them!

15 Comments
sharder8
2
sharder8

Assault Rifles are already banned . . . as they should be! Or at least they should require special (stamp) permits at federal and state levels, as it already is. Now if you're asking if semi-auto sporting rifles should be banned, the answer is NO!

Reply
Scott Camps
Scott Camps

dude, not calling them assault rifles will not bring the murdered children back to life, ban them

Shamra D Wampler
2
Shamra D Wampler

Armed forces should be the only ones allowed to have assault rifles. They are for one thing only: to kill humans. Hunters don't use them, and they are not needed for self protection unless you are in the middle of a war where there are several people that want to take your life.

Reply
Gabe West
Gabe West

Gun control is not the answer

Larry Ewart
1
Larry Ewart

I just do not see the need to own a assault rifle. I’m all for self defense and hunting but those automatic weapons are for military use. Imo.

Reply
Ali Loya
1
Ali Loya

There is absolutely no reason for assault rifles to be as readily available as they are. I support our rights as a gun owner myself, but this type of weapon is simply unnecessary. In light of the violence in our country, they should only be accessible in a controlled environment.

Reply
Jamie Potts
1
Jamie Potts

Why should anyone besides law enforcement need to own or have them? They can not be used for hunting purposes or any thing else. Why use them to kill children and anyone for that matter!! What has this world came too?

Reply
Debra Sun-Mills
1
Debra Sun-Mills

Certain types of guns have no purpose other than the mass killing of other human beings. You don't need an assault rifle to kill deer or protect your property. I don't think all guns should be banned as they can be used for hunting or protecting your property. But we do need more mental healthcare

Reply
Greg Moore
Greg Moore

The 2nd Amendment was not about hunting, it was specifically to keep any despotic power in check... to protect the rights of American citizens against enemies foreign and domestic. See Australian COVID lockdowns from last year, that is why we need semi-auto rifles (they are not assault rifles)

Jake M
1
Jake M

Guns don't kill people? By that logic, neither do nuclear weapons. Maybe one will randomly fall from the sky in the general vicinity of Congress so the new congress might FINALLY do something

Reply
Shannon Bergstedt
1
Shannon Bergstedt

Tired of all the unnecessary killings.

Reply
Nicole Smith
1
Nicole Smith

Its just something that needs to be done.

Reply
Steven Daniels
1
Steven Daniels

Of course, you could always be attacked by a vicious herd of deer. And what else could the biggest cowards hide behind? Maybe the deaths of the innocents is less important than fear of the emasculated.

Reply
Gabe West
Gabe West

Gun control is not the answer

Steven Daniels
Steven Daniels

So says the emasculated.

Rick Lewis
Gabe West
Gabe West

Gun control is not the answer

Lisa York
1
Lisa York

no reason to have one unless you're Military or police...

Reply
Gabe West
Gabe West

Gun control is not the answer, what if the police take awhile to come

Scott Camps
0
Scott Camps

all semi-auto magazine fed rifles should be made illegal, along with the magazines. Enough is enough

Reply

No, we shouldn't ban them!

15 Comments
dbuchanan@midstateelectric.coop
2
dbuchanan@midstateelectric.coop

It's not a fire arm issue it's a mental health issue that needs to be addressed.

Reply
John Philo
2
John Philo

It's called the 2nd Amendment!

Reply
Gabe West
2
Gabe West

That won't stop shootings, people will just use other guns and banning guns is not the answer

Reply
Dave Voiles
1
Dave Voiles

The US is 3rd in murders worldwide. If you remove Chicago, Detroit, Wa DC, St Louis and New Orleans...ALL democrat run with STRICT gun laws, we become 189th out of 193 countries in the world. Curious too, why do dems never want armed guards in schools??

Reply
Greg Moore
1
Greg Moore

1st of all, an ignorant titled thread. These are not "assault rifles", these are semi-auto sporting rifles. 2nd, after the BLM/Floyd riots, and Australian COVID lockdowns, the need for full 2nd Amendment protection has never been so important.

Reply
Kristen Newton
1
Kristen Newton

Deaths by all rifles are a tiny % of firearm-related deaths in this country, and mass shootings account for .5% of homicides. I'm opposed to stripping away gun ownership rights of law-abiding citizens, while turning a blind eye to the thousands who die in Democrat-run cities from their policies.

Reply
Kitt Hawkins
1
Kitt Hawkins

The 2nd amendment shall not be infringed!

Reply
Randy Gillespie
1
Randy Gillespie

Well first of all I'm a responsible gun owner and I own all kinds of weapons but I make sure that they stay home at night and they don't go out killing without some idiot behind it so until you people figure out what the problem is about mental then let's quit talking about guns

Reply
Dennis Rogers
1
Dennis Rogers

Define assault rifles.

Reply
Robert Northrup
0
Robert Northrup

"Today we need a nation of minute men; citizens who are not only prepared to take up arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as a basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom." John F. Kennedy

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT