Do you think traffic cameras are a good idea or not?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
939 Votes

Do you think traffic cameras are a good idea or not?

They're a good idea!

11

They're not a good idea!

4

They're a good idea!

9 Comments
Nicole Jackson
1
Nicole Jackson

There aren't enough law enforcement officers to police the dysfunction & endangerment of people running lights, & blocking the intersection

Reply
Dieter Heinzer
1
Dieter Heinzer

Anything that will help slow down the insane amount of speeding on the Parkway is a good thing.

Reply
Tim Collins
0
Tim Collins

I just wish they would use them to send out Traffic Tickets!

Reply
Kevin Crabtree
0
Kevin Crabtree

Only if they are mobile so you can use them in problem area's until problem is solved not as permanent like above a stop light that is just Policing for Profit.

Reply
Les Adams
0
Les Adams

Speed is clearly a problem on the parkway and much of 97. I can't see how enforcing laws that protect public safety is too much government control.

Reply
Kenneth Emmrich
0
Kenneth Emmrich

Yes, put them up. The visitors and residents from the South and the North all think that they are a big fish in a small pond and drive like they do back where they came from. They drive like it is a video game and endanger everyone on the roads.

Reply
Todd Miller
0
Todd Miller

Sloppy driving, speeding and lack of traffic police to deture these actions to prevent accidents and possible injuries to those doing the right thing. It costs everyone in higher insurance rates in areas with more accidents.

Reply
Charles Baca
0
Charles Baca

We need traffic cams at all lights. EVERYBODY IN THIS TOWN RUNS RED LIGHTS!!!! It

Reply

They're not a good idea!

3 Comments
William P.
0
William P.

We lived in Tucson, AZ. where they had these camera's & shortly taken out of service because the person driving the vehicle couldn't be without a doubt 100% identified. The plate # could be seen, but not the driver/owner. Cost Pima County residents millions of dollars. Waste of $. Fix the pot holes.

Reply
Rick Allen
0
Rick Allen

Absolutely NOT! That is like a privacy infringement, government over reach at best. Spying on citizens, imagine what that could start! So I say NO, NO and by the way(blank) NO!

Reply
Jim Hipp
0
Jim Hipp

Enough government control!

Reply
Les Adams
Les Adams

It's not more "control" to enforce laws that already exist to protect public safety.

CB
CB

Well if people would drive at a safe speed, they wouldn't have to treat everyone like idiots.

Would you take a pay cut for more sleep?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
735 Votes

Would you take a pay cut for more sleep?

Yes, for my health!

1

No way!!

4

Yes, for my health!

1 Comment
Libby Christian
0
Libby Christian

Cuz I love to sleep and it's healthy

Reply

No way!!

4 Comments
Dan Taylor
1
Dan Taylor

Under 30 years old, it comes built in

Reply
Janine Dobkins Hansen
0
Janine Dobkins Hansen

Doesn’t matter anyway I’m still not going to sleep enough

Reply
Sam Ackerman
0
Sam Ackerman

I learned a job skill that pay's very well and do not need to work more then 40 hours a week. Shot I dont even need to work the whole year.

Reply
Should taxpayer money go towards the White House ballroom?

Should taxpayer money go towards the White House ballroom?

Yes

0

No

4

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

4 Comments
Patty Contreras
0
Patty Contreras

Big waste of money on a vanity project that does not benefit Americans. Money can be better spent on Healthcare, the homeless, housing, daycare, education..I could go on and on. This president is the biggest conman and grifter ever in history. He has already wasted & stolen billions of dollars.

Reply
Linda Rothrock Jurus
0
Linda Rothrock Jurus

When it proposed Trump said it was being built by private donors! Now Liar in Chief wants taxpayers to foot bill... Just another of many lies!

Reply
L. Maldonado
0
L. Maldonado

Illegal. No Congressional permission. No taxpayer approval. Unneeded. No his personal residence. WH belongs to the people, not the Kremlin look-a-like. Trump is not POTUS; he was constitutionally banned from office. He DID NOT WIN, because the Constitution says so. (14thA, section 3.)

Reply
Ralph Stewart
0
Ralph Stewart

The average American is being hurt by the rising gas and grocery prices and shouldn’t be expected to pay for an extravagant ballroom. The US doesn’t need to be spending money on luxuries like a ballroom, when it can’t pay its 28 TRILLION DOLLARS debt. The country is on the verge of bankruptcy!

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT