KTVZ

KTVZ

www.ktvz.com
Central Oregon's News Leader
Would you support a move to a tax per mile?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
746 Votes

Would you support a move to a tax per mile?

Yes

6

No

17

Yes

6 Comments
Mark Mueller
0
Mark Mueller

I would support a tax per mile for electric vehicles only. There is already enough tax burden on the gas/diesel owner. Why shouldn't electric vehicle owners have pay, they share the same road.

Reply
Ed Holloran
0
Ed Holloran

All users of the road should pay. Not sure how out of state users would pay, like truckers. Paid monthly might work vs end of year payment.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
Latterdaysaint

Increasing taxes will hurt people

dceiplis
0
dceiplis

Because I drive less than 5000 miles a year I believe it would save me money in the end.

Reply
dceiplis
0
dceiplis

Because I drive less than 5000 miles a year. It would hopefully save me some money in the end.

Reply
Michael Bruner
0
Michael Bruner

Only if they totally get rid of the gas tax.

Reply
Michael Scott
0
Michael Scott

It's more fair to all.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
Latterdaysaint

No it not!

No

15 Comments
Teresa Rodriguez
1
Teresa Rodriguez

How are they going to track out of state EVs traveling Oregon highways? This will eventually trickle down to gas vehicles also, but the tax at the pump wont go away. The need is to figure out a way to tax at the charging stations, just like the pumps. Common sense.

Reply
B B
1
B B

We have the state taxing us too much already. Why add another?

Reply
Tracy Evans
1
Tracy Evans

Would I be taxed for gas and miles driven? We don't have hybrid vehicles.

Reply
Jon Krutsch
1
Jon Krutsch

Can't see how this would work. Mile tax replacing gas tax would work if OR was an island. But now I would pay a mile tax plus a gas tax when I travel out of state and out of state people would pay no tax while in OR. No Thanks.

Reply
Melissa Butler
1
Melissa Butler

First of all. You didn't mention the lottery money. Or, how about the "Pot" money. Where is that cash? sitting in a vault? Those funds where supposed to go to roads and schools.We already have some of the highest taxes in our country. We don't need more. This plan will hurt all of us. NO! NO! NO!

Reply
Kevin Nik Myles Hayward
1
Kevin Nik Myles Hayward

Maybe this would work for the EV so they can pay their fair share. and a per mile tole for out of staters.

Reply
Deb Kizer Dyck
1
Deb Kizer Dyck

What needs to happen is a way to tax electric chargers for EVs. People will either detach a "mile counter, or figure out a way to alter it. It needs to come at the "pump" so to speak....whether gas or electricity.

Reply
Mary Nichols
1
Mary Nichols

Ridiculous! We pay exorbitant taxes in the state. Where are our tax dollars going if we can’t even afford to maintain roads?

Reply
Mark Mueller
0
Mark Mueller

I would however support a "per mile" tax if it only applied to electric vehicles. Gas/diesel already pay enough at the pump. After all, it's supposedly for the repair for wear and tear of the roadway we all share.

Reply
Gin Freeman
0
Gin Freeman

I drive out of state a lot and don't want to be taxed twice. It would also disincentivise people from buying hybrids and EVs. The gas savings is part of the calculation and changing the rules is a little baity switchy.

Reply
Kimmy Wasatch
0
Kimmy Wasatch

No, enough already with the left, liberal policies. Seems this is meant to drive people to EV,s for the farce of climate change.

Reply
Erica Crossan
0
Erica Crossan

Because I live on the east side of the mountains and we have to drive a long distance to get to the doctor, grocery shopping, ect. So therefore we will get screwed again and end up paying way more than people on the west side of the mountains. What about people that drive for a living?

Reply
Lisa York
0
Lisa York

absolutely ridiculous proposal...NO MORE TAXES!

Reply
AL Roxburgh
0
AL Roxburgh

It would be a tax on those who could least afford it. It's a luxury to afford to live in the city, close to services. Those who can't afford that luxury have much longer commutes to work and shop, therefore would be taxed more. Not acceptable.

Reply
Would you support drones delivering packages to your front door?

Would you support drones delivering packages to your front door?

YES

0

NO

1

YES

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

NO

1 Comment
Steven Huillet
0
Steven Huillet

Don't need drones flying around our neighborhood.

Reply
Do you think the positives will outweigh the negatives in Pres. Trump's domestic spending agenda?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
274 Votes

Do you think the positives will outweigh the negatives in Pres. Trump's domestic spending agenda?

YES

3

NO

2

YES

3 Comments
Mike Williams
0
Mike Williams

The government needs no more money. Making tax cuts permanent saves the working people

Reply
Jeff Bradfeldt
0
Jeff Bradfeldt

This will take time to kick in, by next year it should be looking much better.

Reply
Angela Peebles
0
Angela Peebles

Your news is very bias lately we might stop watching

Reply

NO

2 Comments
Debbie Kensinger
1
Debbie Kensinger

The only positive is for the ultra-wealthy people and large corporations. There are no benefits for the average American taxpayers. It will cause more inflation. That means even higher prices for groceries and other goods.

Reply
Debbi McMahon
1
Debbi McMahon

Because Trump has cut many much-needed programs such as the National Parks and the Dept. of Education. Bad moves!

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT