Host of Superhero Rewind and The Captain Logan Show on YouTube! Reviewing superhero media, comics and other geeky stuff since 2009!
Which of these MCU movies are you more intrigued to see after the trailers?

Which of these MCU movies are you more intrigued to see after the trailers?

Shang-Chi

5

The Eternals

7

Shang-Chi

5 Comments
Christopher Garrett
1
Christopher Garrett

The trailer looked better and I'm very curious to see how they explain the Mandarin twist in iron man 3

Reply
Chewbaacca's Lover
1
Chewbaacca's Lover

I think they both will probably suck, but I guess Shang Chi.

Reply
Tyler Thompson
0
Tyler Thompson

The Eternals does not look like a marvel movie at all tbh it looks like some futuristic sci-fi movie with advances biotechnology

Reply
rockmanlp
0
rockmanlp

Neither. Boycotting Disney for blatant racism.

Reply
Bluedragonfive
0
Bluedragonfive

eternals hasn't sold me yet, shang chi on the other hand has provided a nice recap of the character & his story, tease of the mandarin that has me intrigued and some cool action. right now eternals has 10 characters I cant glom onto yet, I got more outta the description then the trailer on that one.

Reply

The Eternals

6 Comments
Mutale Mwananshiku
1
Mutale Mwananshiku

I'm intrigued to see both films but Eternals more because it looks the most ambitious and has the most potential from its source material. Shang-chi looks to have the best action in a marvel movie but eternals could have the best story.

Reply
Waira
0
Waira

Shang-Chi looks like it will be a fun summer flick, but The Eternals feels much more profound and will surely lead to a very interesting addition to the overall MCU storyline.

Reply
Conner Nielsen
0
Conner Nielsen

It looks more visually, and tonally, interesting and unique.

Reply
C-Man
0
C-Man

I think I’m more excited for Shang Chi, but I’m beyond intrigued by the Eternals because I really have no clue what we’re getting and I can’t wait to see what Chloe Zhao brings to the table

Reply
Jedi Knight
0
Jedi Knight

I want to get into martial arts movies, and this looks like a good start.

Reply
Jedi Knight
Jedi Knight

Wrong button again. Got to stop voting in the morning.

Super Billy
0
Super Billy

More visually and tonally compelling. Looks less creatively compromised. Better cast. More stylistically distinct from much of the MCU. Based on more interesting source material.

Reply
After seeing The Matrix: Revolutions, do you want to see a Matrix 5?

After seeing The Matrix: Revolutions, do you want to see a Matrix 5?

Yes- I need more of that world

1

No- That franchise should be put to bed

4

Yes- I need more of that world

1 Comment
Conner Nielsen
0
Conner Nielsen

I suppose I don’t “need” more of this world, but I’m interested to see more of how this new Matrix works.

Reply

No- That franchise should be put to bed

4 Comments
VideoGameSecrets
0
VideoGameSecrets

I don’t like that The Matrix got any sequels.

Reply
rockmanlp
0
rockmanlp

Mister Wachowski is a no talent man, just like his brother.

Reply
Robo Brando
0
Robo Brando

Loved it but it wasn’t a set-up more than a coda where Trinity and Neo get what they deserve as a parallel to Lana’s life. A creator with a new outlook reflecting on material and a legacy made when they were almost literally a different person. Lana‘s now free to change The Matrix, as in the movie.

Reply
Kevin Santiago
0
Kevin Santiago

Honestly, The Matrix should’ve just been one movie, only cuz it was only one movie that worked, and that’s the first one. It was lightning in a bottle that caught waves and can’t be replicated by the multiple sequels. Plus Keanu’s doing so much better in his newer movies, especially in John Wick.

Reply
Which mantle, which is usually one person, works better as a legacy character, i.e. Green Lantern?

Which mantle, which is usually one person, works better as a legacy character, i.e. Green Lantern?

Batman

1

Spider-Man

3

Batman

1 Comment
Andrew Cozzini
0
Andrew Cozzini

Definitely Batman! I think this is because fans are used to Batman being more malleable, as Kane and Finger's Batman was a pretty basic, archetypal character that had an awesome motif. As such, the only real qualifiers are being someone who suffered a crime-related tragedy and stands against crime.

Reply

Spider-Man

3 Comments
Alex007
1
Alex007

The idea that anybody could be Spider-Man is a quintessential characteristic of the core of the character, you can be rich, poor, black or white and still be Spider-Man, even Stan said that's why he wears a full face mask, so it naturally follows that he is the best legacy heroes ever created.

Reply
jaredd
0
jaredd

I feel like the point of Spider-Man is that anybody can be Spider-Man. Miles and Peter are different characters with their own upbringings. It’s not the same for Batman. Bruce Wayne IS Batman. Only Bruce can really understand what it means to be Batman on a more intimate, personal level in my eyes.

Reply
Gregor Tolyns
0
Gregor Tolyns

Honestly I believe that Miles is the best example and most successful example of a legacy character ever, in just a little over a decade he has been in animated TV shows, animated movies, and video games, and now a sizeable part of the fandom considers him THE Spider-Man.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT