Host of Superhero Rewind and The Captain Logan Show on YouTube! Reviewing superhero media, comics and other geeky stuff since 2009!
What surprised you more about today's Marvel announcement?

What surprised you more about today's Marvel announcement?

Black Panther in Wakanda Forever title

7

Captain Marvel not in The Marvels title

2

Black Panther in Wakanda Forever title

7 Comments
Jedi Knight
0
Jedi Knight

I thought that it would be weird to call something "Black Panther" without Black Panther I'm it.

Reply
Tank Gunner
0
Tank Gunner

The captain marvel 2 title didnt surpise me because we knew they were going to have that team in it anyway Black panthers title is more surprising

Reply
rockmanlp
0
rockmanlp

Not surprised about the Captain Marvel movie title, Captain Woke is by far the worst MCU movie, and pushes the disgusting liberal agenda.

Reply
John
0
John

I was surprised that this movie was coming out this soon, also there were rumors that Ms. Marvel will be in the Captain Marvel 2, and the idea was the having her in the title was dumb. "Captain Marvel 2: Ms Marvel is also in this one". I was expecting a change of title for that one.

Reply
Ben Thompson
0
Ben Thompson

I'm surprised by weirdly not surprised, because with how big Wakanda forever came as soon as I heard it my brain went of course that's what they went with. But I don't like the title very much. It's really clunky to me. The marvels is a much nicer title and fitting with who all is in it

Reply
Brian Klein
0
Brian Klein

I'm really curious as to how they are going to handle this one and what surprises they have in store for us.

Reply
Waira
0
Waira

I love the fact that they’re making Wakanda the center piece of the film. There’s so much to explore in the characters we’ve seen thus far, and it’s a great way to deal with the fact that Chadwick is gone. RIP

Reply

Captain Marvel not in The Marvels title

2 Comments
IamTheGuamGuy
0
IamTheGuamGuy

Just was overall surprising and means all the other Marvels will be on equal footing

Reply
Matthew Clarke Flint
0
Matthew Clarke Flint

The first movie not to feature the character's name in the title. Also don't all MCU movies qualify for this title, since they're all "Marvels" technically? I get it, it's cause Ms Marvel's in it, but still. I also don't like the logo meshing the two different styles together, even Loki's was better

Reply
After seeing The Matrix: Revolutions, do you want to see a Matrix 5?

After seeing The Matrix: Revolutions, do you want to see a Matrix 5?

Yes- I need more of that world

1

No- That franchise should be put to bed

4

Yes- I need more of that world

1 Comment
Conner Nielsen
0
Conner Nielsen

I suppose I don’t “need” more of this world, but I’m interested to see more of how this new Matrix works.

Reply

No- That franchise should be put to bed

4 Comments
VideoGameSecrets
0
VideoGameSecrets

I don’t like that The Matrix got any sequels.

Reply
rockmanlp
0
rockmanlp

Mister Wachowski is a no talent man, just like his brother.

Reply
Robo Brando
0
Robo Brando

Loved it but it wasn’t a set-up more than a coda where Trinity and Neo get what they deserve as a parallel to Lana’s life. A creator with a new outlook reflecting on material and a legacy made when they were almost literally a different person. Lana‘s now free to change The Matrix, as in the movie.

Reply
Kevin Santiago
0
Kevin Santiago

Honestly, The Matrix should’ve just been one movie, only cuz it was only one movie that worked, and that’s the first one. It was lightning in a bottle that caught waves and can’t be replicated by the multiple sequels. Plus Keanu’s doing so much better in his newer movies, especially in John Wick.

Reply
Which mantle, which is usually one person, works better as a legacy character, i.e. Green Lantern?

Which mantle, which is usually one person, works better as a legacy character, i.e. Green Lantern?

Batman

1

Spider-Man

3

Batman

1 Comment
Andrew Cozzini
0
Andrew Cozzini

Definitely Batman! I think this is because fans are used to Batman being more malleable, as Kane and Finger's Batman was a pretty basic, archetypal character that had an awesome motif. As such, the only real qualifiers are being someone who suffered a crime-related tragedy and stands against crime.

Reply

Spider-Man

3 Comments
Alex007
1
Alex007

The idea that anybody could be Spider-Man is a quintessential characteristic of the core of the character, you can be rich, poor, black or white and still be Spider-Man, even Stan said that's why he wears a full face mask, so it naturally follows that he is the best legacy heroes ever created.

Reply
jaredd
0
jaredd

I feel like the point of Spider-Man is that anybody can be Spider-Man. Miles and Peter are different characters with their own upbringings. It’s not the same for Batman. Bruce Wayne IS Batman. Only Bruce can really understand what it means to be Batman on a more intimate, personal level in my eyes.

Reply
Gregor Tolyns
0
Gregor Tolyns

Honestly I believe that Miles is the best example and most successful example of a legacy character ever, in just a little over a decade he has been in animated TV shows, animated movies, and video games, and now a sizeable part of the fandom considers him THE Spider-Man.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT