Host of Superhero Rewind and The Captain Logan Show on YouTube! Reviewing superhero media, comics and other geeky stuff since 2009!
What surprised you more about today's Marvel announcement?

What surprised you more about today's Marvel announcement?

Black Panther in Wakanda Forever title

7

Captain Marvel not in The Marvels title

2

Black Panther in Wakanda Forever title

7 Comments
Jedi Knight
0
Jedi Knight

I thought that it would be weird to call something "Black Panther" without Black Panther I'm it.

Reply
Tank Gunner
0
Tank Gunner

The captain marvel 2 title didnt surpise me because we knew they were going to have that team in it anyway Black panthers title is more surprising

Reply
rockmanlp
0
rockmanlp

Not surprised about the Captain Marvel movie title, Captain Woke is by far the worst MCU movie, and pushes the disgusting liberal agenda.

Reply
John
0
John

I was surprised that this movie was coming out this soon, also there were rumors that Ms. Marvel will be in the Captain Marvel 2, and the idea was the having her in the title was dumb. "Captain Marvel 2: Ms Marvel is also in this one". I was expecting a change of title for that one.

Reply
Ben Thompson
0
Ben Thompson

I'm surprised by weirdly not surprised, because with how big Wakanda forever came as soon as I heard it my brain went of course that's what they went with. But I don't like the title very much. It's really clunky to me. The marvels is a much nicer title and fitting with who all is in it

Reply
Brian Klein
0
Brian Klein

I'm really curious as to how they are going to handle this one and what surprises they have in store for us.

Reply
Waira
0
Waira

I love the fact that they’re making Wakanda the center piece of the film. There’s so much to explore in the characters we’ve seen thus far, and it’s a great way to deal with the fact that Chadwick is gone. RIP

Reply

Captain Marvel not in The Marvels title

2 Comments
IamTheGuamGuy
0
IamTheGuamGuy

Just was overall surprising and means all the other Marvels will be on equal footing

Reply
Matthew Clarke Flint
0
Matthew Clarke Flint

The first movie not to feature the character's name in the title. Also don't all MCU movies qualify for this title, since they're all "Marvels" technically? I get it, it's cause Ms Marvel's in it, but still. I also don't like the logo meshing the two different styles together, even Loki's was better

Reply
Would Sonic the Hedgehog 3 perform fine without Jim Carrey if he decides not to do it?

Would Sonic the Hedgehog 3 perform fine without Jim Carrey if he decides not to do it?

Yes-- the franchise has legs without him

1

No-- he's necessary to its success

1

Yes-- the franchise has legs without him

1 Comment
DIMWITMONKEY
0
DIMWITMONKEY

Jim Carry's performance is only one of the many positives of both films. It may not be AS good or enjoyable, but the Sonic films have shown to be better than they have any right to be outside of Carry's performance. It would be a great time to introduce characters that have yet to make an appearance

Reply

No-- he's necessary to its success

1 Comment
Colin Carroll
0
Colin Carroll

he is a legend he makes the movie

Reply
Should the next on screen Wolverine be short and scrappy like he is in the comics?

Should the next on screen Wolverine be short and scrappy like he is in the comics?

Yes, that would set him apart

1

No, general audiences won't accept it

0

Yes, that would set him apart

1 Comment
Andrew Cozzini
1
Andrew Cozzini

While I certainly can appreciate a comic-accurate build for Logan this time 'round, personally, I'm more hopeful he suits up in a form of his traditional uniform, cowl and all! IMO, that would instantly separate this new version from Jackman's, regardless of his relative height to his predecessor.

Reply

No, general audiences won't accept it

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT