Host of Superhero Rewind and The Captain Logan Show on YouTube! Reviewing superhero media, comics and other geeky stuff since 2009!
Is Batman and Robin really the better Schumacher Batman movie?

Is Batman and Robin really the better Schumacher Batman movie?

Ridiculous. It's Batman Forever.

12

Yep, at least it knows how stupid it is.

4

Ridiculous. It's Batman Forever.

12 Comments
Robert Wild
2
Robert Wild

Batman and Robin might be the more tonally consistent film of the two, but the best scenes in Batman and Robin are never as good as the best scenes in Batman Forever in my opinion. I also think Batman Forever just tells a better Batman story overall.

Reply
Chewbacca's Lover
2
Chewbacca's Lover

Batman Forever is more balanced and less awkward, but both are better stories than Batman Returns and actually about Batman.

Reply
Liam Donaghy
1
Liam Donaghy

Batman Forever is obviously the better film because, for all its faults, it's at least trying to be about Batman's character. Batman & Robin is nothing but a feature-length toy commercial. B&R even steals most of its plot from Forever.

Reply
Andrew Cozzini
0
Andrew Cozzini

No way, "Batman Forever" is definitely the better movie of the 2! This is not to say I even dislike "Batman & Robin," as I see it as a harmless flick. However, "Forever" places Batman in the center of the story, executes a well-done Robin origin, and offers up a great Riddler! "Forever" is a blast!

Reply
VideoGameSecrets
0
VideoGameSecrets

I don’t think I have to explain anything for this. Batman and Robin is, at least I think, the worst Batman movie. It’s stupid, doesn’t really have a plot, and Batman Forever just is a better movie overall.

Reply
Shaun Blake
0
Shaun Blake

Because Baan Forever is actually trying trying be a movie about Bruce Wayne's psychology. The first movie to attempt this. Sure Begins would do it better but no other attempt was made before this. Also the tone, costumes and style are so much better. B&R is just a childish rehash

Reply
NICOLAS GARCIA
0
NICOLAS GARCIA

The one thing I can appreciate about Forever is the decent attempt and mostly successful character study of Bruce. It's actually the first film before Begins where Bruce is the protagonist. Kilmers performance is underrated too. That's the one thing that makes it better for me.

Reply
Tomislav Kralj
0
Tomislav Kralj

While I can enjoy B&R for the reason of it knowing how stupid it is, Forever though has genuinely well done ideas, concepts, set pieces, with it feeling like an early 70s Batman comic book

Reply
Justin Hayes
0
Justin Hayes

You’re a little early for April Fools ya know

Reply
Newt
0
Newt

It's just a better written and acted movie hands down. People want to give Batman and Robin too much because it's admittedly received far too much vitriol, but that should lead to us proclaiming such a poor film good (or even decent - this one is quite bad).

Reply
Jedi Knight
0
Jedi Knight

Wha??? Who is saying that?

Reply

Yep, at least it knows how stupid it is.

4 Comments
Spencer Nielsen
0
Spencer Nielsen

At least Batman & Robin doesn’t have the crushing weight of failed ambition on it. I feel like at some point (very early on in its writing process) there was a good version of Batman Forever. As it exists, Batman Forever is more frustrating to me than the completely integrity-free Batman & Robin.

Reply
Adam Stewart
0
Adam Stewart

Not because it's stupid. I find this movie to have a beautiful Bruce/Alfred relationship, a solid arc for Bruce in him having to trust others for help, let go of trying to control things. I may think BF technically a better movie, but this has a stronger Bruce and Alfred elements.

Reply
Nick hughes
0
Nick hughes

If we assume Arnie and Jim Carey cancel each other out. Uma Thurman is much better in her role than Tommie Lee Jones and for that reason I’d say Batman and Robin is more watchable

Reply
Conner Nielsen
0
Conner Nielsen

Batman & Robin may follow the structure laid by Forever (which was itself following Returns’ absent structure), but Schumacher’s second Bat-flick is the only 90’s Batman sequel that has an identifiable central plot.

Reply
Would Sonic the Hedgehog 3 perform fine without Jim Carrey if he decides not to do it?

Would Sonic the Hedgehog 3 perform fine without Jim Carrey if he decides not to do it?

Yes-- the franchise has legs without him

1

No-- he's necessary to its success

1

Yes-- the franchise has legs without him

1 Comment
DIMWITMONKEY
0
DIMWITMONKEY

Jim Carry's performance is only one of the many positives of both films. It may not be AS good or enjoyable, but the Sonic films have shown to be better than they have any right to be outside of Carry's performance. It would be a great time to introduce characters that have yet to make an appearance

Reply

No-- he's necessary to its success

1 Comment
Colin Carroll
0
Colin Carroll

he is a legend he makes the movie

Reply
Should the next on screen Wolverine be short and scrappy like he is in the comics?

Should the next on screen Wolverine be short and scrappy like he is in the comics?

Yes, that would set him apart

1

No, general audiences won't accept it

0

Yes, that would set him apart

1 Comment
Andrew Cozzini
1
Andrew Cozzini

While I certainly can appreciate a comic-accurate build for Logan this time 'round, personally, I'm more hopeful he suits up in a form of his traditional uniform, cowl and all! IMO, that would instantly separate this new version from Jackman's, regardless of his relative height to his predecessor.

Reply

No, general audiences won't accept it

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT