Host of Superhero Rewind and The Captain Logan Show on YouTube! Reviewing superhero media, comics and other geeky stuff since 2009!
Do you think Doctor Strange In the Multiverse of Madness is a good sequel to Doctor Strange (2016)?

Do you think Doctor Strange In the Multiverse of Madness is a good sequel to Doctor Strange (2016)?

Yes, it naturally follows

4

No, it doesn't have enough to do with it

5

Yes, it naturally follows

4 Comments
Joshua Russo
2
Joshua Russo

Yeah, it's not a direct sequel, but it still feels like a sequel to the first one, it feels like how Days of Future Past followed First Class, plenty of things happened in between those 2 movies but they are still following the same characters and themes.

Reply
Andrew Cozzini
1
Andrew Cozzini

I think the film and its central question "Are you happy?" is actually the MOST logical next story for Dr. Strange. I'm not sure I'd think this the most logical next step if it had released somewhere in '17 or '18. But, given all the wacky hijinks Stephen has gotten into since, it oddly grounds him.

Reply
Mutale Mwananshiku
0
Mutale Mwananshiku

Despite not continuing the mordo stuff its a good follow up because its much darker and weirder than the first film and i liked exploring strange's character by contrasting him with the choices his variants made.

Reply
Brian Klein
0
Brian Klein

I loved every minute of it.

Reply
Bostino
Bostino

no shot...

No, it doesn't have enough to do with it

4 Comments
Bostino
0
Bostino

it looks like a low-budget remake, with a poor story

Reply
NICOLAS GARCIA
0
NICOLAS GARCIA

Visually, it's absolutely masterful. Visuals, action, cinematography, and performances are perfect. The story and writing does not compliment those things and film suffers fundamentally with regressing and repeating arcs (Wanda). Also between Mordo and Christine it seems we have a movie missing.

Reply
Justin Hayes
0
Justin Hayes

I’m on the fence, but I think no. I think you miss too much in-between if you go from one to the next

Reply
Eric Cope
0
Eric Cope

It's more of a sequel to WandaVision than Dr Strange. There's a lot that doesn't even get mentioned that takes place between the 1st and 2nd films.

Reply
After seeing The Matrix: Revolutions, do you want to see a Matrix 5?

After seeing The Matrix: Revolutions, do you want to see a Matrix 5?

Yes- I need more of that world

1

No- That franchise should be put to bed

4

Yes- I need more of that world

1 Comment
Conner Nielsen
0
Conner Nielsen

I suppose I don’t “need” more of this world, but I’m interested to see more of how this new Matrix works.

Reply

No- That franchise should be put to bed

4 Comments
VideoGameSecrets
0
VideoGameSecrets

I don’t like that The Matrix got any sequels.

Reply
rockmanlp
0
rockmanlp

Mister Wachowski is a no talent man, just like his brother.

Reply
Robo Brando
0
Robo Brando

Loved it but it wasn’t a set-up more than a coda where Trinity and Neo get what they deserve as a parallel to Lana’s life. A creator with a new outlook reflecting on material and a legacy made when they were almost literally a different person. Lana‘s now free to change The Matrix, as in the movie.

Reply
Kevin Santiago
0
Kevin Santiago

Honestly, The Matrix should’ve just been one movie, only cuz it was only one movie that worked, and that’s the first one. It was lightning in a bottle that caught waves and can’t be replicated by the multiple sequels. Plus Keanu’s doing so much better in his newer movies, especially in John Wick.

Reply
Which mantle, which is usually one person, works better as a legacy character, i.e. Green Lantern?

Which mantle, which is usually one person, works better as a legacy character, i.e. Green Lantern?

Batman

1

Spider-Man

3

Batman

1 Comment
Andrew Cozzini
0
Andrew Cozzini

Definitely Batman! I think this is because fans are used to Batman being more malleable, as Kane and Finger's Batman was a pretty basic, archetypal character that had an awesome motif. As such, the only real qualifiers are being someone who suffered a crime-related tragedy and stands against crime.

Reply

Spider-Man

3 Comments
Alex007
1
Alex007

The idea that anybody could be Spider-Man is a quintessential characteristic of the core of the character, you can be rich, poor, black or white and still be Spider-Man, even Stan said that's why he wears a full face mask, so it naturally follows that he is the best legacy heroes ever created.

Reply
jaredd
0
jaredd

I feel like the point of Spider-Man is that anybody can be Spider-Man. Miles and Peter are different characters with their own upbringings. It’s not the same for Batman. Bruce Wayne IS Batman. Only Bruce can really understand what it means to be Batman on a more intimate, personal level in my eyes.

Reply
Gregor Tolyns
0
Gregor Tolyns

Honestly I believe that Miles is the best example and most successful example of a legacy character ever, in just a little over a decade he has been in animated TV shows, animated movies, and video games, and now a sizeable part of the fandom considers him THE Spider-Man.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT