KTVZ

KTVZ

www.ktvz.com
Central Oregon's News Leader
Would you support requiring gun safety training before being able to buy a firearm?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
1,035 Votes

Would you support requiring gun safety training before being able to buy a firearm?

Yes, I would support!

10

No, I wouldn't support!

11

Yes, I would support!

10 Comments
Robert Northrup
1
Robert Northrup

I had to take a class to carry concealed. In the end only law abiding citizens will comply. The criminals will still have guns and our justice system will continue turning criminals loose so they can prey on the innocent..

Reply
Gabe West
1
Gabe West

Yes but that doesn't matter to the criminals

Reply
Ron Johansen
0
Ron Johansen

You have to learn to drive before you can drive. You have to take a forklift before you can drive a forklift. Why not know what you're doing before obtaining a deadly weapon of war?

Reply
Nicole Jackson
0
Nicole Jackson

Other counties with stringent mental health, & gun safety programs have the lowest crime rates & out of them Australia has had 3 shootings since 1996...Japan has had 6 people die by gunfire in the last year...The U.S. has miserably failed in the safety arena

Reply
Les Adams
0
Les Adams

How can anyone oppose gun safety classes for people who want to own guns? That's like being opposed to driver training before someone is permitted to drive on public roads.

Reply
Jeff Sanders
0
Jeff Sanders

There are many, many countries we could follow the example of. The 2nd amendment talks about a well armed militia, not a overly armed militia of one.

Reply
sharder8
0
sharder8

13 years in the Army and CHL holder for over 30 years. There's no such thing as too many firearm safety classes. Laws change and one way to get those changes out is through firearms safety class. A yearly refresher course should also be available.

Reply
Pam Robbins
0
Pam Robbins

It makes sense, and might cut down on "accidental" shootings.

Reply

No, I wouldn't support!

9 Comments
Penny Hansen
3
Penny Hansen

This will not stop anyone from obtaining a gun. If they are planning an attack of any type, they will just choose a different weapon.

Reply
John Philo
John Philo

Your common sense answer has no meaning to the anti - 2nd Amendment people. They only want to eventually remove your rights completely.

Mark
2
Mark

I dont mind more safety courses, Those should be accepted, but not mandatory. The rest of the proposed bill is absolute nonsense.

Reply
Rob Mozz
0
Rob Mozz

It's your right to own a firearm so unless you forfeited that right by committing a felony there shouldn't be any restrictions. Oregon should be a constitutional carry state.

Reply
Robert Mozzetti
0
Robert Mozzetti

Just another way for the government to tax you for practicing your constitutional right to bear arms. It's not a privilege like driving.

Reply
Adam Johnson
0
Adam Johnson

I dont support it being mandatory but I would support an additional 5% tax on firearms and accessories to pay for training for people that want/need it.

Reply
Greg Moore
0
Greg Moore

The 2nd Am't, according to the Founding Fathers, was to preserve liberty, not hunting, not self-defense. Therefore, no registry may ever be allowed. Thomas Jefferson best discusses this: “I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery.” – Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, 1/30/1787

Reply
Greg Moore
Greg Moore

“What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms.” – Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, December 20, 1787

Kevin Crabtree
0
Kevin Crabtree

but they should put in schools maybe part of PE or another class for 2 weeks.

Reply
Nik Myles
0
Nik Myles

This would be one step away from preventing us our rights to bare arms.

Reply
Have you seen your insurance premiums go up in recent years?

Have you seen your insurance premiums go up in recent years?

YES

0

NO

0

YES

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

NO

0 Comment
No one has commented yet
Do you agree with the administration's assessment of Portland?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
222 Votes

Do you agree with the administration's assessment of Portland?

YES

1

NO

6

YES

1 Comment
AJ Middleton
0
AJ Middleton

The Oregon government and local police force has done a HORRIBLE job at keeping crime down, protecting cities, citizens and federal agents. If they can't do their job, TRUMP WILL.

Reply
Mike OConnor
Mike OConnor

Oh yeah, Trump did a great protecting when he incited the riot at the Capital on January 6th. Then had the unmitigated gall to pardon his MAGA idots for their crimes. What a guy...

NO

5 Comments
Lisa York
1
Lisa York

Trump's a big man-baby... needs to get his own house in order before sticking his nose in our business...and what's -her -name is just a mouthpiece...no original thought on anything...

Reply
Mike OConnor
0
Mike OConnor

I usually spend a number of days each month in the Portland area, including downtown. Having worked in downtown Portland for many years, yes it's not what it once was. Having said that, it's definitely not a "war zone" and nothing like Trump and his minions would like you to think.

Reply
Richard Martinson
0
Richard Martinson

A bunch of crap from the Trump administration that hopes to incite a violent response that justifies the use of violence and military action. Illegal, immoral, and unconstitutional. Get them out!

Reply
Jim McAllister
0
Jim McAllister

Because the exaggeration of conditions in Portland, LA, memphis and Chicago is nowhere near the actual events. He and his henchpeople including traitor dereamer are only creating a reason to occupy american cities and attack the democrats.

Reply
Lexus Maximus
0
Lexus Maximus

It’s a very small minority that’s causing a problem and for the most part, the marches are peaceful and none-combative. Portland’s problems, generally speaking; are the homeless sleeping on the streets and trashing the area, and not people marching in the streets.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT