KTVZ

KTVZ

www.ktvz.com
Central Oregon's News Leader
Would you support requiring gun safety training before being able to buy a firearm?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
1,035 Votes

Would you support requiring gun safety training before being able to buy a firearm?

Yes, I would support!

10

No, I wouldn't support!

11

Yes, I would support!

10 Comments
Robert Northrup
1
Robert Northrup

I had to take a class to carry concealed. In the end only law abiding citizens will comply. The criminals will still have guns and our justice system will continue turning criminals loose so they can prey on the innocent..

Reply
Gabe West
1
Gabe West

Yes but that doesn't matter to the criminals

Reply
Ron Johansen
0
Ron Johansen

You have to learn to drive before you can drive. You have to take a forklift before you can drive a forklift. Why not know what you're doing before obtaining a deadly weapon of war?

Reply
Nicole Jackson
0
Nicole Jackson

Other counties with stringent mental health, & gun safety programs have the lowest crime rates & out of them Australia has had 3 shootings since 1996...Japan has had 6 people die by gunfire in the last year...The U.S. has miserably failed in the safety arena

Reply
Les Adams
0
Les Adams

How can anyone oppose gun safety classes for people who want to own guns? That's like being opposed to driver training before someone is permitted to drive on public roads.

Reply
Jeff Sanders
0
Jeff Sanders

There are many, many countries we could follow the example of. The 2nd amendment talks about a well armed militia, not a overly armed militia of one.

Reply
sharder8
0
sharder8

13 years in the Army and CHL holder for over 30 years. There's no such thing as too many firearm safety classes. Laws change and one way to get those changes out is through firearms safety class. A yearly refresher course should also be available.

Reply
Pam Robbins
0
Pam Robbins

It makes sense, and might cut down on "accidental" shootings.

Reply

No, I wouldn't support!

9 Comments
Penny Hansen
3
Penny Hansen

This will not stop anyone from obtaining a gun. If they are planning an attack of any type, they will just choose a different weapon.

Reply
John Philo
John Philo

Your common sense answer has no meaning to the anti - 2nd Amendment people. They only want to eventually remove your rights completely.

Mark
2
Mark

I dont mind more safety courses, Those should be accepted, but not mandatory. The rest of the proposed bill is absolute nonsense.

Reply
Rob Mozz
0
Rob Mozz

It's your right to own a firearm so unless you forfeited that right by committing a felony there shouldn't be any restrictions. Oregon should be a constitutional carry state.

Reply
Robert Mozzetti
0
Robert Mozzetti

Just another way for the government to tax you for practicing your constitutional right to bear arms. It's not a privilege like driving.

Reply
Adam Johnson
0
Adam Johnson

I dont support it being mandatory but I would support an additional 5% tax on firearms and accessories to pay for training for people that want/need it.

Reply
Greg Moore
0
Greg Moore

The 2nd Am't, according to the Founding Fathers, was to preserve liberty, not hunting, not self-defense. Therefore, no registry may ever be allowed. Thomas Jefferson best discusses this: “I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery.” – Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, 1/30/1787

Reply
Greg Moore
Greg Moore

“What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms.” – Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, December 20, 1787

Kevin Crabtree
0
Kevin Crabtree

but they should put in schools maybe part of PE or another class for 2 weeks.

Reply
Nik Myles
0
Nik Myles

This would be one step away from preventing us our rights to bare arms.

Reply
Should the Oregon legislature create Charlie Kirk day?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
441 Votes

Should the Oregon legislature create Charlie Kirk day?

Yes

1

No

16

Yes

1 Comment
LuLyn Howard
0
LuLyn Howard

Charlie Kirk was a man of faith and gave his very life for the values I stand for. He was a voice heard around the world

Reply

No

16 Comments
Pat Nelson Wilson
2
Pat Nelson Wilson

He doesn’t deserve it. He is a nobody and spewed hateful rhetoric.

Reply
Janice Adair
2
Janice Adair

He was a racist, white supremacist, and very divisive figure. The political violence that ended his lift is a terrible thing but it’s something he helped foment. This is the most ridiculous idea I can imagine.

Reply
Lisa Alexander
2
Lisa Alexander

He was a racist person who spread hate.

Reply
Jane CommunityMember
1
Jane CommunityMember

I never heard of this guy before he was murdered, but it looks like he had a track record of saying awful things, and fomented the conditions in society that led to his demise. That's very tragic, but there are other people more deserving of a day.

Reply
k san
0
k san

Absolutely NOT!! He was a racist extraordinaire and spread divisive speech and ideas.

Reply
Byron Barclay
0
Byron Barclay

Because his MO is actually deceptive & decisive!

Reply
Linda Spaet
0
Linda Spaet

Though this is a tragic incident and a terrible time of violence in our country, Mr. Kirk was not an elected official. We should honor his family and respect them in many ways and I certainly have sympathy for his family. But this does not warrant aday in Oregon devoted to his name or his politics.

Reply
Robert Spaet
0
Robert Spaet

A highly partisan figure in American politics should never be given a day of observance for any reason. It should be acknowledge that violence is not acceptable in any form for any reason, but it should not be honored and given Publicity because of it.

Reply
Alex GERRITY
0
Alex GERRITY

He was not a government figure, and while I don’t condone the violence that took his life, he called on his supporters to bail out others that committed violence against elected government officials.

Reply
Laurie Maholland
0
Laurie Maholland

Mr. Kirk was too controversial and not a hero.

Reply
celeste carico
0
celeste carico

This guy was homophobic, racist, and anti women’s rights. While I think his murder is wrong, he is not a hero. He encouraged hatred towards people he didn’t agree with their lifestyles in his “teachings”. I don’t think Jesus would support him…he preached love for everyone!

Reply
Gerald Wonnacott
0
Gerald Wonnacott

We didn't create a Melissa Hortmann day and she was a good person. Charlie Kirk's rhetoric was about racism, sexism, mysoginism, and divisiveness. He was not a good person and represented everything that was NOT Christian.

Reply
Jim Terry
0
Jim Terry

Need I really explain

Reply
Shannon Gamble
0
Shannon Gamble

Sure! Let's give kudos to the shooter! NOT! What about the 5 officers who just got shot in Pennsylvania? Should we have a day for that too?? Absolutely NOT necessary.

Reply
Do you think the fair should negotiate for a 20 year long term contract?

Do you think the fair should negotiate for a 20 year long term contract?

Yes

0

No

0

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT