KTVZ

KTVZ

www.ktvz.com
Central Oregon's News Leader
Will you pay $24 to park at Redmond airport?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
929 Votes

Will you pay $24 to park at Redmond airport?

Yes

0

No

19

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

16 Comments
Dave Coppedge
3
Dave Coppedge

This is absolutely ridiculous. For travellers from Bend, it's too difficult to find transportation options, especially for the 5am flights to Seattle since you can berely get anywhere direct. This is nothing more than an unrealistic money grab.

Reply
Raymond Headley
2
Raymond Headley

PDX has covered parking for $24 a day

Reply
Terri
2
Terri

You can't compare RDM airport to other airports that have larger aircraft in and out. 24.00 is ridiculous. It's smarter to charge less & have more parkers than higher fees and fewer cars parking there.

Reply
Bob Majka
2
Bob Majka

Hell no, PDX is $12.00 a day.

Reply
Bruce Wade
1
Bruce Wade

It was stated that Eugene charges $27. But they have 3 different parking options. Short term at $27, Long term at $16, and Economy at $10. We don't have those options in RDM. PDX has the same 3 options. Short term $30, Long term $24, Economy $15. The airport rep is skewing the facts!

Reply
Mary Opperman
1
Mary Opperman

My trip to go see my 99 year old mom in Wisconsin is already outrageously expensive. I don't care if the Redmond Airport expands or not, it works just fine right now, in my opinion. This is a 62% increase in the cost and that's absurd! This is another money suck from the consumer. I vote no!

Reply
Suzie Cox
1
Suzie Cox

$24 a day is ridiculous. There is NO reason why it needs to be that high.

Reply
m
1
m

We are being nickle and dime to the brink. I'm going to take this opportunity to say to all Redmond residents. Stop voting in things that increases our property tax.

Reply
m
m

I'm also tired of hearing airliners fly over my house and vibrating things on my walls.

Kimmy Wasatch
1
Kimmy Wasatch

Larger airports have better facilities for less. Much better to just get a ride to the airport.

Reply
Larry Merrill
1
Larry Merrill

Parking shouldn't be funding the airport, just upkeep and expansion of parking services.

Reply
Carol Seymour
0
Carol Seymour

For how long 2weeks?

Reply
Deb Kizer Dyck
0
Deb Kizer Dyck

That's a ridiculous amount of money to add on top of an already expensive way to travel.

Reply
GT Thomas
0
GT Thomas

Redmonds becoming bg government tax tax tax.

Reply
Corie Pelcher
0
Corie Pelcher

Why don’t they put a higher price tag on the closer lots and offer offsite cheaper parking. This would offer everyone a good option not just people who have more money.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

The airline ticket is already expensive

Reply
Latterdaysaint
Latterdaysaint

No I didnt

With these federal funding cuts are you worried about the effects to our national parks?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
275 Votes

With these federal funding cuts are you worried about the effects to our national parks?

Yes

0

No

1

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

1 Comment
Chris Herndon
1
Chris Herndon

I think if managed properly by the Super. The budgets are workable with fewer employees multi tasking and wearing more than one hat!Any buisness can benefit with improved efficiency!!

Reply
Is someone who lets their pet off-leash in restricted areas considered a 'bad pet owner?'
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
706 Votes

Is someone who lets their pet off-leash in restricted areas considered a 'bad pet owner?'

Yes

6

No

4

Yes

6 Comments
Kristi Murdock
1
Kristi Murdock

Even a friendly dog with excellent recall can cause real problems for the owner walking their reactive dog on leash; a dog running free is highly exciting to other dogs; it's not fair for the owner of the reactive dog to have to deal with that overstimulation in a "leash only" area.

Reply
robert weber
robert weber

I recently I commented that it is not fair. But your comment makes me feel incorrect. I have had a reactive dog before and I feel that your comment is valid.

Kati Magana
0
Kati Magana

If it is a law and you break it regardless of what it refers to that is breaking the law- which by definition is criminal. If you put your pet in a situation that is unsafe that is your responsibility and ergo you are a bad pet owner. Pets are like our kids, it's our job to keep them safe.

Reply
Kim Ritchie
0
Kim Ritchie

yes because they are putting their dog as well as people with leashed pets at risk. Not all dogs like other dogs and not all people are comfortable with strange dogs running up to them.

Reply
Ann Thomas
0
Ann Thomas

There are laws and rules for a reason. No one should think that laws and rules don't apply to them. If they want their dog off leash then go out in the woods where no one else is or to a fenced dog park.

Reply
Deborah Albright
0
Deborah Albright

BECAUSE most dog owners that do this have zero respect for others or property.. NEVER pick up poop and feel entitled

Reply
Nic Secor
0
Nic Secor

There are leash laws for good reason. On a side note Bend Parks and Recreation need to put up signs at dog parks reminding owners that they are liable for damages their dogs cause to other dogs or humans under Oregon law. Bend PD treat dog parks like they are outside of their jurisdiction.

Reply

No

3 Comments
Amanda Jones
1
Amanda Jones

A bad dog owner is someone who is not able to care of the animal or mistreats the animal. The person is just not considerate of others and will break the law for whatever reason they may have. *if you have an aggressive dog it is the OWNERS responsibility to keep the dog under control anywhere

Reply
Payton Dixson
1
Payton Dixson

There are many factors, if your dog has great recall and obeys to stay in a heal being off leash is fine as the dog is still in verbal control. Dogs that do not listen should not be off leash.

Reply
robert weber
0
robert weber

Maybe there pet is trusted and not reactive. Why does a none relative happy pet need to be restricted?

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT