KTVZ

KTVZ

www.ktvz.com
Central Oregon's News Leader
Should the state move forward with Measure 114?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
4/11/2023

Should the state move forward with Measure 114?

16%
Yes

2

84%
No WINNER

21

16%
Yes

1 Comments
hi
0
hi

The people have spoken.

Reply

84%
No

17 Comments
Ron Johnson
5
Ron Johnson

Why should 3-4 countys tell the rest of the state what to do.

Reply
P Robbins
P Robbins

because they comprise most of the *people*

Kevin Nik Myles Hayward
4
Kevin Nik Myles Hayward

M-114 will do nothing to keep guns from the hands of criminals. M-114 only works to further prevent the law biding citizen from their legal right to purchase a firearm

Reply
Poo
2
Poo

Unconstitutional. “Assault Weapons” a term that the ATF has struggled to define and most modern countries define as select fire aka full auto. Red flag laws still let people drive vehicles, own knives and other deadly weapons. Blame the bad people not a piece of metal!

Reply
Your Face
2
Your Face

Shouldn't even be up for discussion. Move somewhere else if you are afraid of armed law abiding citizens.

Reply
William Chivers
2
William Chivers

All this measure does is it makes it harder for law abiding citizens to own firearms. No matter how hard we try to keep firearms away from those who shouldn't have them, those people will always figure out how to get them. I believe crime would be better deterred if open carry were legal.

Reply
Kenneth Converse
Kenneth Converse

Open carry is legal. Conceal carry without a permit is illegal.

Alexander Hada
2
Alexander Hada

Law empowers and gives carte blanche to police to decide who gets a firearm. Which means marginalized LGBT+ and POC will be denied in favor of right wing extremists. Would also increase policing in POC communities via magazine ban & also create a database that would target marginalized communities.

Reply
sandra zollman
sandra zollman

Oh baloney.

Jim Newton
2
Jim Newton

Measure 114 has several concerning components that likely violate the US constitution, cause an undue burden on the local police and is essentially a money/tax black hole.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
2
Latterdaysaint

It's against the 2nd amendment

Reply
Paul Owen
1
Paul Owen

It would be the toughest gun law in the United States and as well seen in Los Angeles, Chicago and New York City and look at Australia. Tough Gun laws do not work I am not against the background checks, I think that religion needs to stay out of politics and use their money to spread Christianity

Reply
sandra zollman
sandra zollman

Sorry, I'll take my Christianity any where I please.

Kevin Nik Myles Hayward
Kevin Nik Myles Hayward

Even Jesus said to sell your cloak an buy a sword.

sandra zollman
0
sandra zollman

Government needs to stop trying to destroy our Constitutional rights. 114 is the Democrats means to deny guns to those that "don't pass our tests". Taking a shooting class is just another tax and has nothing to do with gun owning rights. It is not governments business to know who owns guns.

Reply
Mark Mueller
0
Mark Mueller

How about locking up criminals instead? They have no regard for a "Law" in the first place.

Reply
Jerry Springer
0
Jerry Springer

“Shall not infringe “

Reply
Rick Allen
0
Rick Allen

No absolutely not. The constitution is what it is to keep unconstitutional things like this from happening. 114 is in violation of the second amendment and would do harm not any good. It will not keep criminals from getting guns, it will hamper honest people. Backwards thinking.

Reply
Jonathan Wichunu
0
Jonathan Wichunu

Measure 114 is unconstitutional. It should never have made it onto the ballot.

Reply
Kimmy Wasatch
0
Kimmy Wasatch

When will people understand that the violence is a people probLem and not a gun problem. Until people are held accountable, charged and not realesed early or without bail, nothing will change. Decrimalizing drugs contributes to the problem. Too much liberal, left policies.

Reply
Is someone who lets their pet off-leash in restricted areas considered a 'bad pet owner?'
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
442 Votes

Is someone who lets their pet off-leash in restricted areas considered a 'bad pet owner?'

Yes

4

No

4

Yes

4 Comments
Kristi Murdock
1
Kristi Murdock

Even a friendly dog with excellent recall can cause real problems for the owner walking their reactive dog on leash; a dog running free is highly exciting to other dogs; it's not fair for the owner of the reactive dog to have to deal with that overstimulation in a "leash only" area.

Reply
robert weber
robert weber

I recently I commented that it is not fair. But your comment makes me feel incorrect. I have had a reactive dog before and I feel that your comment is valid.

Ann Thomas
0
Ann Thomas

There are laws and rules for a reason. No one should think that laws and rules don't apply to them. If they want their dog off leash then go out in the woods where no one else is or to a fenced dog park.

Reply
Deborah Albright
0
Deborah Albright

BECAUSE most dog owners that do this have zero respect for others or property.. NEVER pick up poop and feel entitled

Reply
Nic Secor
0
Nic Secor

There are leash laws for good reason. On a side note Bend Parks and Recreation need to put up signs at dog parks reminding owners that they are liable for damages their dogs cause to other dogs or humans under Oregon law. Bend PD treat dog parks like they are outside of their jurisdiction.

Reply

No

3 Comments
Amanda Jones
1
Amanda Jones

A bad dog owner is someone who is not able to care of the animal or mistreats the animal. The person is just not considerate of others and will break the law for whatever reason they may have. *if you have an aggressive dog it is the OWNERS responsibility to keep the dog under control anywhere

Reply
Payton Dixson
1
Payton Dixson

There are many factors, if your dog has great recall and obeys to stay in a heal being off leash is fine as the dog is still in verbal control. Dogs that do not listen should not be off leash.

Reply
robert weber
0
robert weber

Maybe there pet is trusted and not reactive. Why does a none relative happy pet need to be restricted?

Reply
Will you be attending the Burgerville grand opening?

Will you be attending the Burgerville grand opening?

Yes

0

No

1

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

1 Comment
Amanda Jones
0
Amanda Jones

BV is not a good quality restaurant for the cost. Have never liked them and always like Del Taco.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT