KTVZ

KTVZ

www.ktvz.com
Central Oregon's News Leader
Should the state move forward with Measure 114?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
4/11/2023

Should the state move forward with Measure 114?

16%
Yes

2

84%
No WINNER

21

16%
Yes

1 Comments
hi
0
hi

The people have spoken.

Reply

84%
No

17 Comments
Ron Johnson
5
Ron Johnson

Why should 3-4 countys tell the rest of the state what to do.

Reply
P Robbins
P Robbins

because they comprise most of the *people*

Kevin Nik Myles Hayward
4
Kevin Nik Myles Hayward

M-114 will do nothing to keep guns from the hands of criminals. M-114 only works to further prevent the law biding citizen from their legal right to purchase a firearm

Reply
Poo
2
Poo

Unconstitutional. “Assault Weapons” a term that the ATF has struggled to define and most modern countries define as select fire aka full auto. Red flag laws still let people drive vehicles, own knives and other deadly weapons. Blame the bad people not a piece of metal!

Reply
Your Face
2
Your Face

Shouldn't even be up for discussion. Move somewhere else if you are afraid of armed law abiding citizens.

Reply
William Chivers
2
William Chivers

All this measure does is it makes it harder for law abiding citizens to own firearms. No matter how hard we try to keep firearms away from those who shouldn't have them, those people will always figure out how to get them. I believe crime would be better deterred if open carry were legal.

Reply
Kenneth Converse
Kenneth Converse

Open carry is legal. Conceal carry without a permit is illegal.

Alexander Hada
2
Alexander Hada

Law empowers and gives carte blanche to police to decide who gets a firearm. Which means marginalized LGBT+ and POC will be denied in favor of right wing extremists. Would also increase policing in POC communities via magazine ban & also create a database that would target marginalized communities.

Reply
sandra zollman
sandra zollman

Oh baloney.

Jim Newton
2
Jim Newton

Measure 114 has several concerning components that likely violate the US constitution, cause an undue burden on the local police and is essentially a money/tax black hole.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
2
Latterdaysaint

It's against the 2nd amendment

Reply
Paul Owen
1
Paul Owen

It would be the toughest gun law in the United States and as well seen in Los Angeles, Chicago and New York City and look at Australia. Tough Gun laws do not work I am not against the background checks, I think that religion needs to stay out of politics and use their money to spread Christianity

Reply
sandra zollman
sandra zollman

Sorry, I'll take my Christianity any where I please.

Kevin Nik Myles Hayward
Kevin Nik Myles Hayward

Even Jesus said to sell your cloak an buy a sword.

sandra zollman
0
sandra zollman

Government needs to stop trying to destroy our Constitutional rights. 114 is the Democrats means to deny guns to those that "don't pass our tests". Taking a shooting class is just another tax and has nothing to do with gun owning rights. It is not governments business to know who owns guns.

Reply
Mark Mueller
0
Mark Mueller

How about locking up criminals instead? They have no regard for a "Law" in the first place.

Reply
Jerry Springer
0
Jerry Springer

“Shall not infringe “

Reply
Rick Allen
0
Rick Allen

No absolutely not. The constitution is what it is to keep unconstitutional things like this from happening. 114 is in violation of the second amendment and would do harm not any good. It will not keep criminals from getting guns, it will hamper honest people. Backwards thinking.

Reply
Jonathan Wichunu
0
Jonathan Wichunu

Measure 114 is unconstitutional. It should never have made it onto the ballot.

Reply
Kimmy Wasatch
0
Kimmy Wasatch

When will people understand that the violence is a people probLem and not a gun problem. Until people are held accountable, charged and not realesed early or without bail, nothing will change. Decrimalizing drugs contributes to the problem. Too much liberal, left policies.

Reply
Would you like to see the sale of public lands to help with the federal budget deficit?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
116 Votes

Would you like to see the sale of public lands to help with the federal budget deficit?

YES

1

NO

5

YES

1 Comment
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

Yes, and do some more logging and cleaning the forest

Reply

NO

5 Comments
k san
0
k san

The federal budget deficit would be EASILY diminished if the Rs in Congress would vote to make the tax system fairer by making the top richest pay their fair share. But they won't. They'd rather take from the poor+ middle class and sale public lands vs. doing the obvious and fairest remedy!!

Reply
Karen Thrower
0
Karen Thrower

It is a shameful idea. These lands belong to all of us, and are not for sale.

Reply
Scott Taylor
0
Scott Taylor

Hey, If Mike Lee wants to sell Utah's public lands, see how his constituents like it with theirs. Stay away from Oregon and the other states who don't like it. If Trump wants his big ugly bill to pass, reimburse the government for what the taxpayers pay for his golfing at his resorts + his parade.

Reply
Oakley Taylor
0
Oakley Taylor

This would be a crime and one that is irreversible. If Trump needed the money so bad, maybe he shouldn’t have spent our hard-earned tax money on his birthday parade. I am a public land owner and I oppose this proposition. How dare Mike Lee try pulling off this crap on us. We’re not stupid.

Reply
Carol Yetter
0
Carol Yetter

Public lands are our heritage due to the foresight of great individuals. Only those interested in profiteering propose and support the rape of Oregon and public properties.

Reply
Are you excited to see the Redmond Airport expand?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
380 Votes

Are you excited to see the Redmond Airport expand?

Yes

4

No

1

Yes

4 Comments
Nina Senn
1
Nina Senn

The terminal expansion is exciting and so needed! This airport is nice already but expanding and updating it is necessary given the growing demand. My family and I use it regularly and we look forward to more travel options and amenities.

Reply
k san
0
k san

I wouldn't use the word "excited," but it will be a welcome change!

Reply
David Kline
0
David Kline

Ready for the 747s!

Reply
Charlie Lyster
0
Charlie Lyster

More potential for cheaper airfare/ more options for a single carrier to better take advantage of there air miles

Reply

No

1 Comment
Carol Garside
0
Carol Garside

More & bigger planes? Huge power lines coming in basically to support data centers. Central Oregon is long gone from the gem it once was.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT