KTVZ

KTVZ

www.ktvz.com
Central Oregon's News Leader
Should parking requirements be loosened to encourage more apartment construction?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
1,180 Votes

Should parking requirements be loosened to encourage more apartment construction?

Yes, they should be loosened!

5

No, they shouldn't!

18

Yes, they should be loosened!

5 Comments
Doug Klotz
1
Doug Klotz

More housing, and lower price, is needed. Requiring parking, even when the tenants don't want to pay the cost of it, only raises housing prices, and reduces the amount that can be built on a parcel of land. If tenants want parking, and it's hard to find, developers can provide it.

Reply
Tony Jordan
1
Tony Jordan

People shouldn't be forced to purchase car parking to get housing. This won't stop parking from being built, it will provide more, much needed, housing options. People in the "No, they shouldn't!" column can pay for all the parking they want!

Reply
Brad Livsey
0
Brad Livsey

Absolutely!!!! In fact, why not just turn downtown Bend into a walking mall and restrict all vehicles and bicycles traffic whatsoever? Did it work in Eugene in the '70's. Absolutely not!! Most business' closed. Build apartments is akin to closing downtown Eugene. Restrice travel, close Bend retail!!

Reply
Grace Bedell
0
Grace Bedell

The government should not force auto subsidies on businesses or homes.

Reply
Byron Buck
0
Byron Buck

The younger generation are moving away from cars. Let the market decide this. People that need off street parking can seek those units. Those that don't, won't

Reply

No, they shouldn't!

18 Comments
BendDrives
2
BendDrives

Bend is already making significant changes to development codes to encourage construction. Eliminating all parking requirements is not necessary. Doing so would allow developers to avoid creating off-street parking and instead opt for on-street credits, often counting a single space multiple times.

Reply
HS
1
HS

If Bend's City Council and Planning Dept wants to continue to push people out of cars, they need to get serious about buses, bike lanes, and sidewalks - and snow clearing of sidewalks. This is just another handout our local government is giving to developers - and we voters want this to STOP.

Reply
Judy Ostrom-Dixon
0
Judy Ostrom-Dixon

Parking is a necessity!!!

Reply
robert howard
0
robert howard

way to many people in bend already, keep the californians and mexicans out.

Reply
Ann Thomas
0
Ann Thomas

If parking doesn't generate money....no developer will put in but the bare minimum! Bend's bus system is not adequate for working here let alone playing here!

Reply
k san
0
k san

Parking in Bend is already a problem. Any developer would have to ensure to his potential buyers that they have adequate parking... for the usual 2-car household and for visitors.

Reply
Mike Walker
0
Mike Walker

M. Walker The city has been steadily reducing parking rates for years and the on-street parking overflowing into the surrounding neighborhood just keeps getting worse. City should follow their Comprehensive Plan Policy #39 and practice the "right-sizing" approach staff championed in Dec 2017.

Reply
Jeff Taylor
0
Jeff Taylor

Letting developers determine adequate parking in developments is a terrible idea. Having minimum parking restrictions set by the city provides at minimum, parking year round. If we run out of space for development, that’s ok too.

Reply
Linda Axelsen
0
Linda Axelsen

Until Bend’s population and culture support a realistic mass-transit system people will continue to drive personal vehicles. We already have a undesirable on-street parking problem with the minimum set. Lowering that minimum is irresponsible to the quality of life most of us are seeking here.

Reply
Caleb M.
0
Caleb M.

I know who I'm not voting for next time around. Let's just allow people to live here who don't drive a car at all. Who needs parking.

Reply
Gregory Knapp
0
Gregory Knapp

I look at existing complexes apartments etc, and the public parking is taken by people living in these living spaces. It hurts the citizens that want to use these parking spaces to use when they want to go into a store or restaurant..

Reply
David Flett
0
David Flett

Expand the UGB if builders want to make more money. This does not have to be uncontrolled sprawl. It just needs to be sensible. People with no allotted parking will park on the street. Look around, people!

Reply
Todd Brown
0
Todd Brown

Parking spots are an essential part of housing! How ludicrous this even would be considered.

Reply
Nancy
0
Nancy

Make developers pay for the land, don't make it easy for them to build more homes. Our new city counsel members need to be educated on problems this creates keep parking for residents, and make developers follow the laws in place.

Reply
Jeff Sorrick
0
Jeff Sorrick

I understand land is a premium resource in Bend. By allowing developers to make that decision regarding the number of parking space will be a disaster. Give them an inch, they'll take a mile. Please please please, stop funding Visit Bend. A 5yr moratorium is needed. We don't need to advertise anymo

Reply
Connie Murray
0
Connie Murray

Just where will residents park? Can’t trust developers not to take advantage; they do already. Enough is enough.

Reply
P Robbins
0
P Robbins

Parking is a necessity whether you're in low-income or high-income housing. In an effort not to use more land for parking, the parking needs to go underground or on a lower level of the home/apartment. Ignoring the parking issue will place the parking burden on surrounding neighborhoods.

Reply
Should the Oregon legislature create Charlie Kirk day?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
415 Votes

Should the Oregon legislature create Charlie Kirk day?

Yes

1

No

16

Yes

1 Comment
LuLyn Howard
0
LuLyn Howard

Charlie Kirk was a man of faith and gave his very life for the values I stand for. He was a voice heard around the world

Reply

No

16 Comments
Pat Nelson Wilson
2
Pat Nelson Wilson

He doesn’t deserve it. He is a nobody and spewed hateful rhetoric.

Reply
Janice Adair
2
Janice Adair

He was a racist, white supremacist, and very divisive figure. The political violence that ended his lift is a terrible thing but it’s something he helped foment. This is the most ridiculous idea I can imagine.

Reply
Lisa Alexander
2
Lisa Alexander

He was a racist person who spread hate.

Reply
Jane CommunityMember
1
Jane CommunityMember

I never heard of this guy before he was murdered, but it looks like he had a track record of saying awful things, and fomented the conditions in society that led to his demise. That's very tragic, but there are other people more deserving of a day.

Reply
k san
0
k san

Absolutely NOT!! He was a racist extraordinaire and spread divisive speech and ideas.

Reply
Byron Barclay
0
Byron Barclay

Because his MO is actually deceptive & decisive!

Reply
Linda Spaet
0
Linda Spaet

Though this is a tragic incident and a terrible time of violence in our country, Mr. Kirk was not an elected official. We should honor his family and respect them in many ways and I certainly have sympathy for his family. But this does not warrant aday in Oregon devoted to his name or his politics.

Reply
Robert Spaet
0
Robert Spaet

A highly partisan figure in American politics should never be given a day of observance for any reason. It should be acknowledge that violence is not acceptable in any form for any reason, but it should not be honored and given Publicity because of it.

Reply
Alex GERRITY
0
Alex GERRITY

He was not a government figure, and while I don’t condone the violence that took his life, he called on his supporters to bail out others that committed violence against elected government officials.

Reply
Laurie Maholland
0
Laurie Maholland

Mr. Kirk was too controversial and not a hero.

Reply
celeste carico
0
celeste carico

This guy was homophobic, racist, and anti women’s rights. While I think his murder is wrong, he is not a hero. He encouraged hatred towards people he didn’t agree with their lifestyles in his “teachings”. I don’t think Jesus would support him…he preached love for everyone!

Reply
Gerald Wonnacott
0
Gerald Wonnacott

We didn't create a Melissa Hortmann day and she was a good person. Charlie Kirk's rhetoric was about racism, sexism, mysoginism, and divisiveness. He was not a good person and represented everything that was NOT Christian.

Reply
Jim Terry
0
Jim Terry

Need I really explain

Reply
Shannon Gamble
0
Shannon Gamble

Sure! Let's give kudos to the shooter! NOT! What about the 5 officers who just got shot in Pennsylvania? Should we have a day for that too?? Absolutely NOT necessary.

Reply
Do you think the fair should negotiate for a 20 year long term contract?

Do you think the fair should negotiate for a 20 year long term contract?

Yes

0

No

0

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT