KTVZ

KTVZ

www.ktvz.com
Central Oregon's News Leader
Should parking requirements be loosened to encourage more apartment construction?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
1,180 Votes

Should parking requirements be loosened to encourage more apartment construction?

Yes, they should be loosened!

5

No, they shouldn't!

18

Yes, they should be loosened!

5 Comments
Doug Klotz
1
Doug Klotz

More housing, and lower price, is needed. Requiring parking, even when the tenants don't want to pay the cost of it, only raises housing prices, and reduces the amount that can be built on a parcel of land. If tenants want parking, and it's hard to find, developers can provide it.

Reply
Tony Jordan
1
Tony Jordan

People shouldn't be forced to purchase car parking to get housing. This won't stop parking from being built, it will provide more, much needed, housing options. People in the "No, they shouldn't!" column can pay for all the parking they want!

Reply
Brad Livsey
0
Brad Livsey

Absolutely!!!! In fact, why not just turn downtown Bend into a walking mall and restrict all vehicles and bicycles traffic whatsoever? Did it work in Eugene in the '70's. Absolutely not!! Most business' closed. Build apartments is akin to closing downtown Eugene. Restrice travel, close Bend retail!!

Reply
Grace Bedell
0
Grace Bedell

The government should not force auto subsidies on businesses or homes.

Reply
Byron Buck
0
Byron Buck

The younger generation are moving away from cars. Let the market decide this. People that need off street parking can seek those units. Those that don't, won't

Reply

No, they shouldn't!

18 Comments
BendDrives
2
BendDrives

Bend is already making significant changes to development codes to encourage construction. Eliminating all parking requirements is not necessary. Doing so would allow developers to avoid creating off-street parking and instead opt for on-street credits, often counting a single space multiple times.

Reply
HS
1
HS

If Bend's City Council and Planning Dept wants to continue to push people out of cars, they need to get serious about buses, bike lanes, and sidewalks - and snow clearing of sidewalks. This is just another handout our local government is giving to developers - and we voters want this to STOP.

Reply
Judy Ostrom-Dixon
0
Judy Ostrom-Dixon

Parking is a necessity!!!

Reply
robert howard
0
robert howard

way to many people in bend already, keep the californians and mexicans out.

Reply
Ann Thomas
0
Ann Thomas

If parking doesn't generate money....no developer will put in but the bare minimum! Bend's bus system is not adequate for working here let alone playing here!

Reply
k san
0
k san

Parking in Bend is already a problem. Any developer would have to ensure to his potential buyers that they have adequate parking... for the usual 2-car household and for visitors.

Reply
Mike Walker
0
Mike Walker

M. Walker The city has been steadily reducing parking rates for years and the on-street parking overflowing into the surrounding neighborhood just keeps getting worse. City should follow their Comprehensive Plan Policy #39 and practice the "right-sizing" approach staff championed in Dec 2017.

Reply
Jeff Taylor
0
Jeff Taylor

Letting developers determine adequate parking in developments is a terrible idea. Having minimum parking restrictions set by the city provides at minimum, parking year round. If we run out of space for development, that’s ok too.

Reply
Linda Axelsen
0
Linda Axelsen

Until Bend’s population and culture support a realistic mass-transit system people will continue to drive personal vehicles. We already have a undesirable on-street parking problem with the minimum set. Lowering that minimum is irresponsible to the quality of life most of us are seeking here.

Reply
Caleb M.
0
Caleb M.

I know who I'm not voting for next time around. Let's just allow people to live here who don't drive a car at all. Who needs parking.

Reply
Gregory Knapp
0
Gregory Knapp

I look at existing complexes apartments etc, and the public parking is taken by people living in these living spaces. It hurts the citizens that want to use these parking spaces to use when they want to go into a store or restaurant..

Reply
David Flett
0
David Flett

Expand the UGB if builders want to make more money. This does not have to be uncontrolled sprawl. It just needs to be sensible. People with no allotted parking will park on the street. Look around, people!

Reply
Todd Brown
0
Todd Brown

Parking spots are an essential part of housing! How ludicrous this even would be considered.

Reply
Nancy
0
Nancy

Make developers pay for the land, don't make it easy for them to build more homes. Our new city counsel members need to be educated on problems this creates keep parking for residents, and make developers follow the laws in place.

Reply
Jeff Sorrick
0
Jeff Sorrick

I understand land is a premium resource in Bend. By allowing developers to make that decision regarding the number of parking space will be a disaster. Give them an inch, they'll take a mile. Please please please, stop funding Visit Bend. A 5yr moratorium is needed. We don't need to advertise anymo

Reply
Connie Murray
0
Connie Murray

Just where will residents park? Can’t trust developers not to take advantage; they do already. Enough is enough.

Reply
P Robbins
0
P Robbins

Parking is a necessity whether you're in low-income or high-income housing. In an effort not to use more land for parking, the parking needs to go underground or on a lower level of the home/apartment. Ignoring the parking issue will place the parking burden on surrounding neighborhoods.

Reply
Would you like to see the sale of public lands to help with the federal budget deficit?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
116 Votes

Would you like to see the sale of public lands to help with the federal budget deficit?

YES

1

NO

5

YES

1 Comment
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

Yes, and do some more logging and cleaning the forest

Reply

NO

5 Comments
k san
0
k san

The federal budget deficit would be EASILY diminished if the Rs in Congress would vote to make the tax system fairer by making the top richest pay their fair share. But they won't. They'd rather take from the poor+ middle class and sale public lands vs. doing the obvious and fairest remedy!!

Reply
Karen Thrower
0
Karen Thrower

It is a shameful idea. These lands belong to all of us, and are not for sale.

Reply
Scott Taylor
0
Scott Taylor

Hey, If Mike Lee wants to sell Utah's public lands, see how his constituents like it with theirs. Stay away from Oregon and the other states who don't like it. If Trump wants his big ugly bill to pass, reimburse the government for what the taxpayers pay for his golfing at his resorts + his parade.

Reply
Oakley Taylor
0
Oakley Taylor

This would be a crime and one that is irreversible. If Trump needed the money so bad, maybe he shouldn’t have spent our hard-earned tax money on his birthday parade. I am a public land owner and I oppose this proposition. How dare Mike Lee try pulling off this crap on us. We’re not stupid.

Reply
Carol Yetter
0
Carol Yetter

Public lands are our heritage due to the foresight of great individuals. Only those interested in profiteering propose and support the rape of Oregon and public properties.

Reply
Are you excited to see the Redmond Airport expand?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
380 Votes

Are you excited to see the Redmond Airport expand?

Yes

4

No

1

Yes

4 Comments
Nina Senn
1
Nina Senn

The terminal expansion is exciting and so needed! This airport is nice already but expanding and updating it is necessary given the growing demand. My family and I use it regularly and we look forward to more travel options and amenities.

Reply
k san
0
k san

I wouldn't use the word "excited," but it will be a welcome change!

Reply
David Kline
0
David Kline

Ready for the 747s!

Reply
Charlie Lyster
0
Charlie Lyster

More potential for cheaper airfare/ more options for a single carrier to better take advantage of there air miles

Reply

No

1 Comment
Carol Garside
0
Carol Garside

More & bigger planes? Huge power lines coming in basically to support data centers. Central Oregon is long gone from the gem it once was.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT