KTVZ

KTVZ

www.ktvz.com
Central Oregon's News Leader
Should counties have the right to defy state laws?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
1,579 Votes

Should counties have the right to defy state laws?

Yes, if counties should be able to!

11

No, they should abide state laws!

9

Yes, if counties should be able to!

11 Comments
Rick Allen
0
Rick Allen

We have to get Oregon out of the Democrat's hands and their destructive ways!

Reply
Sussie Due
0
Sussie Due

Federal law trumps state or local laws...UNLESS the state or local laws benefit then the state or local laws prevail. For example. If a federal law says you cannot protect yourself but a state or local law says you can, then the helpful law prevails. Its been like that for years.

Reply
Kimra Tollefson
0
Kimra Tollefson

The state is no longer representing the people. The laws are contrary to the Constitution. The government is betraying its own people.

Reply
Andy Dobrinin
0
Andy Dobrinin

Local control of government. No laws shall be passed that infringe on individuals rights. 2 ND amendment is for the citizens to maintain control of their own person and their government. Without it the country will fail.

Reply
Dawn Williams
0
Dawn Williams

When laws are contradictory to the Constitution they should not be enforced. When tyranny becomes law disobedience become necessary! STOP VOTING FOR LIBERAL DEMOCRATS

Reply
Kelly Jones
0
Kelly Jones

The right of the people to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

Reply
sharder8
0
sharder8

If the state can defy federal laws, the counties should be able to defy state laws.

Reply
Tarasem
Tarasem

Laws are anti-freedom.

Mary M
0
Mary M

Depending on what they are? In this case for guns yes because the State is going against the Constitution for our 2nd amendment right.. "SHALL NOT INFRINGE" SAYS IT ALL!!!

Reply
P Robbins
P Robbins

That's not what the Supreme Court said in Heller.

Matt Cyrus
0
Matt Cyrus

Every elected official takes an oath to uphold the Constitution and are obligated to ignore any law they believe to believe to be unconstitutional.

Reply
P Robbins
P Robbins

No. The Supreme Court decides what is or is not Constitutional, not individuals.

Robert Northrup
0
Robert Northrup

Multnomah County doesn't follow the laws. Portland is quickly becoming like Chicago. Crime and murder are on the rise all over Oregon. Oregon, California and Washington are being destroyed by democrats.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

Conservative counties should defy liberal laws

Reply
Tarasem
Tarasem

Everybody should defy all laws.

No, they should abide state laws!

4 Comments
Brad Livsey
0
Brad Livsey

No but, they have the right (and should benefit from it) to deviate from the FEDERAL norms and mandates when warranted. You know the goose and the gander comparisons don't you?..........Same here!

Reply
k san
0
k san

I can't even believe this is a question!! Of course, they should!

Reply
Les Adams
0
Les Adams

Well, because that's the system in place to protect EVERYONE'S welfare, whether we like every specific law or not.

Reply
P Robbins
0
P Robbins

Laws are for everyone. Without our laws we have anarchy. This is a ridiculous question for a "poll".

Reply
Tarasem
Tarasem

Laws are anti freedom.

Is someone who lets their pet off-leash in restricted areas considered a 'bad pet owner?'
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
346 Votes

Is someone who lets their pet off-leash in restricted areas considered a 'bad pet owner?'

Yes

3

No

4

Yes

3 Comments
Kristi Murdock
1
Kristi Murdock

Even a friendly dog with excellent recall can cause real problems for the owner walking their reactive dog on leash; a dog running free is highly exciting to other dogs; it's not fair for the owner of the reactive dog to have to deal with that overstimulation in a "leash only" area.

Reply
robert weber
robert weber

I recently I commented that it is not fair. But your comment makes me feel incorrect. I have had a reactive dog before and I feel that your comment is valid.

Deborah Albright
0
Deborah Albright

BECAUSE most dog owners that do this have zero respect for others or property.. NEVER pick up poop and feel entitled

Reply
Nic Secor
0
Nic Secor

There are leash laws for good reason. On a side note Bend Parks and Recreation need to put up signs at dog parks reminding owners that they are liable for damages their dogs cause to other dogs or humans under Oregon law. Bend PD treat dog parks like they are outside of their jurisdiction.

Reply

No

3 Comments
Amanda Jones
1
Amanda Jones

A bad dog owner is someone who is not able to care of the animal or mistreats the animal. The person is just not considerate of others and will break the law for whatever reason they may have. *if you have an aggressive dog it is the OWNERS responsibility to keep the dog under control anywhere

Reply
Payton Dixson
1
Payton Dixson

There are many factors, if your dog has great recall and obeys to stay in a heal being off leash is fine as the dog is still in verbal control. Dogs that do not listen should not be off leash.

Reply
robert weber
0
robert weber

Maybe there pet is trusted and not reactive. Why does a none relative happy pet need to be restricted?

Reply
Will you be attending the Burgerville grand opening?

Will you be attending the Burgerville grand opening?

Yes

0

No

1

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

1 Comment
Amanda Jones
0
Amanda Jones

BV is not a good quality restaurant for the cost. Have never liked them and always like Del Taco.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT