Do you think the public should have access to mugshots?

Asked by KTVZ

1,006 Votes

Do you think the public should have access to mugshots?

83%

Yes, everyone should! Yes, everyone should!

17%

No, it should be limited. No, it should be limited.

83%

Yes, everyone should!

I think everyone should be able to have access to view mugshots.

I think everyone should be able to have access to view mugshots. Show Less

5 Comments

HLH *

why not ? it's one of the prices you pay for doing wrong

Me Me

There are increasingly more rights for criminals and fewer rights for law-abiding citizens.

Rose Bud

We need to know what these people look like, for identification and safety.

Tim Collins

yes

Latterdaysaint

It's for are safety

17%

No, it should be limited.

I don't think mugshots should be available for everyone. We need to prevent harassment and one's privacy.

I don't think mugshots should be available for everyone. We need to prevent harassment and one's privacy. Show Less

3 Comments

Mike Everstone

Mugshots are taken however the person is not convicted. Given the number of unarmed people across the US that were shot this year, do you truly believe releasing mugshots of people prior to a hearing where they are connected is a good idea.

Latterdaysaint

It's for our safety

k san

Personally, it makes me cringe when KTVZ starts off their nightly newscast with some stringy, greasy-haired creep's picture on my TV screen for being arrested. It's a complete turnoff! I usually fast-forward over everything else to the weather when they start with that. It is gross.

David Kline

They bias public opinion about the guilt of the arrested. Many times people are arrested & released or the charges are dropped but that mug shot makes us all think they "must have done something". Plus they are just used to shame people as another deterrent to crime. But do they really affect rates?

Do you support the rule changes aimed at reducing light pollution in Central Oregon?

Asked by KTVZ

37 Votes

Do you support the rule changes aimed at reducing light pollution in Central Oregon?

86%

Yes Yes

14%

No No

86%

Yes

4 Comments

Jane CommunityMember

People should not have to put up with annoying intrusive lights that inconsiderate neighbors install

Chris Hill

Board Member of DarkSky Oregon who worked on this with Deschutes County. Currently working to update the 24 year old City of Bend lighting ordinance.

Thomas Orr

I like seeing stars at night. and birds migration is important.

Katherine GoldenEagle

We live across the street from a duplex that has one of those motion sensor lights on the garage. It's soooo bright it lights up my bedroom and my son's and our living room. Thats just ridiclous

14%

No

0 Comment

No one has commented yet

Do you think an additional ICE facility in Oregon would be beneficial?

Asked by KTVZ

79 Votes

Do you think an additional ICE facility in Oregon would be beneficial?

43%

Yes Yes

57%

No No

43%

Yes

1 Comment

Darrell Mona

Too many illegal aliens in the unlawful OR Sanctuary State debacle...

57%

No

3 Comments

k san

Are you kidding with this question???? ICE is staffed by a bunch of n'er-do-wells and untrained baffoons at the behest of the corrupt person in the WH!! Of course! there should be NO ICE facilities anywhere in this country!!

Oakley Taylor

ICE is a dangerous entity and their presence only inspires unnecessary violence in our communities. They have no place in our state, our country.

Deborah Sanderson

I am fed up with right wing jack boots trying to turn to us all into thugs and hatefull people. They have already put the dumbest most corrupt liar, cheat, racist, bigot, adulterer, and all around dumb ass in the white house.

KTVZ

Do you think the public should have access to mugshots?

83% Yes, everyone should! Yes, everyone should!

17% No, it should be limited. No, it should be limited.

83% Yes, everyone should!

17% No, it should be limited.

Do you support the rule changes aimed at reducing light pollution in Central Oregon?

86% Yes Yes

14% No No

86% Yes

14% No

Do you think an additional ICE facility in Oregon would be beneficial?

43% Yes Yes

57% No No

43% Yes

57% No

83%

Yes, everyone should! Yes, everyone should!

17%

No, it should be limited. No, it should be limited.

83%

Yes, everyone should!

17%

No, it should be limited.

86%

Yes Yes

14%

No No

86%

Yes

14%

No

43%

Yes Yes

57%

No No

43%

Yes

57%

No