KTVZ

KTVZ

www.ktvz.com
Central Oregon's News Leader
Do you think schools should teach about Oregon's early black exclusion law?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
641 Votes

Do you think schools should teach about Oregon's early black exclusion law?

Yes

10

No

4

Yes

8 Comments
Matt Stickler
4
Matt Stickler

ALL TRUETFULL HISTORY SHOULD we taught. The good, the bad, and the ugly.

Reply
Kevin Nik Myles Hayward
2
Kevin Nik Myles Hayward

All factual history should be included in the teaching of history. Unlike the 1619 project, the exclusion Claus is a part of true history. If you don't learn from history you are doomed to repeat it.

Reply
John Hargrove
1
John Hargrove

History is history and it should be taught accurately, not spun by either the right or the left.

Reply
Dianne Price
1
Dianne Price

ALL the history of , any state, should be taught!

Reply
SunnySunshinestein
1
SunnySunshinestein

Teach it all, hiding from the truth only serves to make things worse.

Reply
Alma
0
Alma

Well, it's history isn't it? Of course they should read it. The 1859 charter that made Oregon a state says Oregon is to be a white's only state, and the age of consent is 10 years old.

Reply
Jer W
0
Jer W

Yes, but it shouldn't be the primary focus of the entire curriculum. Keep it in context and teach the historical facts.

Reply
Geraldine Boldman Goodson
0
Geraldine Boldman Goodson

It's history and you shouldn't only teach part of history

Reply

No

2 Comments
sandra zollman
2
sandra zollman

This is just more Critical Race Theory meant to divide races and teach that whites are the problem. CTR is a hateful teaching that causes more racism. Teaching the past racism doesn't serve any purpose. It's time to move on and stop dwelling on it.

Reply
sandra zollman
sandra zollman

There's a big difference between teaching history and teaching others to hate using history.

SunnySunshinestein
SunnySunshinestein

Ummm...many whites HAVE been a problem and continued to be for generations. Pretending otherwise hasn't made things better, has it?

Byron Buck
Byron Buck

By that ridiculous logic we shouldn’t teach any history because it’s all in the past. It’s real history and if it makes you uncomfortable that’s your problem.

Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

This is just more critical race theory

Reply
Should there be better vetting of candidates and reporting in the voters pamphlet?

Should there be better vetting of candidates and reporting in the voters pamphlet?

Yes

2

No

0

Yes

2 Comments
Lisa York
0
Lisa York

EVERYTHING submitted by the candidates for inclusion in the voter's pamphlet should be thoroughly vetted!!!

Reply
Marie Gilbert
0
Marie Gilbert

Because he is an elected official and should be 100% honest.

Reply

No

0 Comment
No one has commented yet
Should a judge block the May first closure of China Hat road?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
997 Votes

Should a judge block the May first closure of China Hat road?

YES

3

NO

21

YES

3 Comments
Louis Vaday
0
Louis Vaday

This made an error! I voted NO and it recorded yes! They shouldn't {and ALL} shouldn't be allowed on all public land because they do not follow rules! Dumping garbage, open flames during fire season, over extending time stay, etc. And now because of them our insurance is going up and land value goin

Reply
Brad Hunter
0
Brad Hunter

Because they are steam rolling the homeless

Reply

NO

21 Comments
Tammy Salka
1
Tammy Salka

The homeless are not residents, they are squatters!

Reply
Kayla Sulak
1
Kayla Sulak

These people have had MONTHS of notice. Nobody ever told them it's acceptable to post up long-term there, so they shouldn't have planted their belongings out there if they have no way to move it. This sets a bad precedent if they're allowed to stay.

Reply
Richard Williams
1
Richard Williams

I can no longer use this area of public land for fear of walking into a homeless camp or being attacked by their "pets". This land is for all of us to use, not just the homeless.

Reply
Joanna Lee
1
Joanna Lee

Safety should be the biggest concern here. If these people are homeless, they can travel to another area to reside. Forest service doesn't always implement preventative measures. So this being one of the times they do. Its important to make sure it happens. Before there is anymore devastating fires.

Reply
Shane Murray
1
Shane Murray

The homeless have trashed the forest out there. It makes me sick

Reply
Greg Deadbolt Leach
1
Greg Deadbolt Leach

Time to move these people to the Attorneys and Judges front lawns!!!

Reply
Karen Thrower
1
Karen Thrower

The China Hat area has been badly damaged and disrespected by campers.

Reply
Jeannie H.
1
Jeannie H.

How is this their "home"? Have they paid property tax like the rest of us? How is this state even justifying this?!?!

Reply
Nancy
1
Nancy

They’ve had plenty of time to move. Why can the homeless trash/burn our beautiful forest? Tax paying citizens are only allowed to camp for 14 days! What about the homeowners rights near China Hat, they need to feel safe in their own community! This has gone on way too long and I’m surprised!

Reply
Lynn Marie Leehmann
1
Lynn Marie Leehmann

If you look at the Federal Regulations for camping on Federal land it states only 14 days. These people have over stated their welcome, they need to go and they have known about this for at least six months.

Reply
Brad Aimone
1
Brad Aimone

It is ironic the Bend Equity Group has filed a lawsuit to block the closure. Where is the indignation for the horrible environmental damage done by these campers who’ve violated the USFS long standing limit of a 14 day stay in a primitive camp site?

Reply
Nancy Roquero
1
Nancy Roquero

This has gone on too long. The forests near Woodside community and other neighborhoods need fire protection and protection from the homeless with guns and vicious dogs and the garbage left behind. The homeless have had plenty of notice.

Reply
Lisa York
1
Lisa York

the USFS has been planning this burn since Oct 2019... more than enough time for the homeless/advocacy groups to come up with a plan to move...

Reply
Debbie Boyd
1
Debbie Boyd

This has been going on for way too long & it is ridiculous to postpone as they have known this needs to be done. The forest needs to be protected & these do gooders are too late to the game & so much time & money spent on homeless with ZERO results. We need DOGE. for Oregon!

Reply
Marie Gilbert
0
Marie Gilbert

We live near China Hat and the fear of fire and crime is constant. Plus the forest is being destroyed by illegal cutting of trees, garbage and toxins

Reply
Bendlover
0
Bendlover

I haven't felt safe hiking or biking there for years due to the aggressive homeless people out there.

Reply
Pam
0
Pam

We need to ensure that the lands are managed for the enjoyment/needs of all peoples, not a select few

Reply
pamcuny
0
pamcuny

I worry every year WHO is in the woods starting fires, whether deliberate or unintentional consequences…

Reply
Jeff Sanders
0
Jeff Sanders

I live near China Hat and used to love going out the with my dog. Once weapons started be pulled on people that stopped. I want my forest back. Good riddance to the whole lot. Don't ever come back.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

There needs to be more homeless shelters in the city!

Reply
Kim Kahl
0
Kim Kahl

The danger of fire starting in this area is incredibly high and impacts large subdivisions. It is mandatory to close this area for the safety of all. This should not be a place for camping to be allowed as it has been.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT