This made an error! I voted NO and it recorded yes! They shouldn't {and ALL} shouldn't be allowed on all public land because they do not follow rules! Dumping garbage, open flames during fire season, over extending time stay, etc. And now because of them our insurance is going up and land value goin
Reply ReplyThese people have had MONTHS of notice. Nobody ever told them it's acceptable to post up long-term there, so they shouldn't have planted their belongings out there if they have no way to move it. This sets a bad precedent if they're allowed to stay.
Reply ReplyI can no longer use this area of public land for fear of walking into a homeless camp or being attacked by their "pets". This land is for all of us to use, not just the homeless.
Reply ReplySafety should be the biggest concern here. If these people are homeless, they can travel to another area to reside. Forest service doesn't always implement preventative measures. So this being one of the times they do. Its important to make sure it happens. Before there is anymore devastating fires.
Reply ReplyTime to move these people to the Attorneys and Judges front lawns!!!
Reply ReplyHow is this their "home"? Have they paid property tax like the rest of us? How is this state even justifying this?!?!
Reply ReplyThey’ve had plenty of time to move. Why can the homeless trash/burn our beautiful forest? Tax paying citizens are only allowed to camp for 14 days! What about the homeowners rights near China Hat, they need to feel safe in their own community! This has gone on way too long and I’m surprised!
Reply ReplyIf you look at the Federal Regulations for camping on Federal land it states only 14 days. These people have over stated their welcome, they need to go and they have known about this for at least six months.
Reply ReplyIt is ironic the Bend Equity Group has filed a lawsuit to block the closure. Where is the indignation for the horrible environmental damage done by these campers who’ve violated the USFS long standing limit of a 14 day stay in a primitive camp site?
Reply ReplyThis has gone on too long. The forests near Woodside community and other neighborhoods need fire protection and protection from the homeless with guns and vicious dogs and the garbage left behind. The homeless have had plenty of notice.
Reply ReplyThis has been going on for way too long & it is ridiculous to postpone as they have known this needs to be done. The forest needs to be protected & these do gooders are too late to the game & so much time & money spent on homeless with ZERO results. We need DOGE. for Oregon!
Reply ReplyI live near China Hat and used to love going out the with my dog. Once weapons started be pulled on people that stopped. I want my forest back. Good riddance to the whole lot. Don't ever come back.
Reply ReplyHe should be FIRED immediately as he is the individual in charge of the entire department. He must set the standard of honesty and integrity for both staff and the Public. What type of leader is this? Why is this even being questioned? He faced charges in La Mesa, California as well!
Reply ReplyWhy is he still in this position, come on Deschutes Co. This is pathetic.
Reply ReplyHow can he be trusted to be truthful in anything if he lied about even just this one thing? A man in his position shouldn't be lying about anything at all and the fact that he did makes him untrustworthy 100%.
Reply ReplyJust more Liberal attacks on Conservative. This is what they do because they lost the elections. Poor losers!
Reply ReplyWe use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT
Definitely it is a disaster of epic proportions. It is definitely 100% enabling bad behavior, Portland proves it. It has fueled the homeless crises. They need to stop focusing on the drug users and focus on the decent tax paying citizens that make things work. The left thinks backwards,
ReplyStop decriminalization of drugs in Oregon and many people who use drugs will leave. That will also help get rid of many homeless.
ReplyIt should have never passed in the first place. What we knew would go wrong, did!!
ReplyI support changes. Not repeal. We can cannot afford to go back to the old system of funding treatment.
ReplyChange meaning....abolish it.
Reply