KTVZ

KTVZ

www.ktvz.com
Central Oregon's News Leader
Should the Oregon lawmakers who walked out be eligible for re-election?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
613 Votes

Should the Oregon lawmakers who walked out be eligible for re-election?

Yes

5

No

10

Yes

4 Comments
Steve Derrickson
1
Steve Derrickson

The law stopping them from running is a cheap power grab by the democrats. And, unconstitutional.

Reply
Kevin Nik Myles Hayward
1
Kevin Nik Myles Hayward

They used the only means they had in order to stop unconstructional legislation being brought on be the left.

Reply
Rick Allen
0
Rick Allen

Yes they had to do that to keep the radical left from further damaging our state. Vote the left out so we can get back to being America instead of a 3rd world country.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

Lars Larson has a article about this

Reply
steven
steven

I meant "a" article. "Special".

steven
steven

Isn't that special?

No

7 Comments
daniel tovar
1
daniel tovar

if i feel that stopping at a stop sign is not legal, should i just run it? The message that is being sent is loud and clear that knopp is sending, he"ll do what he wants. if i didn't show up for work as many days that he did i would be fired. the law is the law.

Reply
Oakley Taylor
1
Oakley Taylor

The voters have their say. We shouldn't be paying these people for walking out on their duties.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
Latterdaysaint

There is a lars Larson article about this

Margaret Moore
1
Margaret Moore

Walking out is not representing Oregon. Vote to express your opinion and make sure it represents your constituents.

Reply
Bill Barr
0
Bill Barr

Walking out on your job/duty is disrespectful.

Reply
SunnySunshinestein
0
SunnySunshinestein

Of course not. They knew before they walked out what the consequences would be, they need to buck up and face the music.

Reply
Katy Holcomb
0
Katy Holcomb

We voted on this, it passed and now those Republicans who walked out and didn't do their job want a "do-over". Well, boo hoo, this is the results of your actions (or inactions).

Reply
Jane CommunityMember
0
Jane CommunityMember

Of course not. The voters overwhelmingly said they shouldn't. Don't show up for work? Then lose your job.

Reply
Should a judge block the May first closure of China Hat road?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
876 Votes

Should a judge block the May first closure of China Hat road?

YES

2

NO

18

YES

2 Comments
Brad Hunter
0
Brad Hunter

Because they are steam rolling the homeless

Reply

NO

18 Comments
Kayla Sulak
1
Kayla Sulak

These people have had MONTHS of notice. Nobody ever told them it's acceptable to post up long-term there, so they shouldn't have planted their belongings out there if they have no way to move it. This sets a bad precedent if they're allowed to stay.

Reply
Richard Williams
1
Richard Williams

I can no longer use this area of public land for fear of walking into a homeless camp or being attacked by their "pets". This land is for all of us to use, not just the homeless.

Reply
Joanna Lee
1
Joanna Lee

Safety should be the biggest concern here. If these people are homeless, they can travel to another area to reside. Forest service doesn't always implement preventative measures. So this being one of the times they do. Its important to make sure it happens. Before there is anymore devastating fires.

Reply
Shane Murray
1
Shane Murray

The homeless have trashed the forest out there. It makes me sick

Reply
Greg Deadbolt Leach
1
Greg Deadbolt Leach

Time to move these people to the Attorneys and Judges front lawns!!!

Reply
Karen Thrower
1
Karen Thrower

The China Hat area has been badly damaged and disrespected by campers.

Reply
Jeannie H.
1
Jeannie H.

How is this their "home"? Have they paid property tax like the rest of us? How is this state even justifying this?!?!

Reply
Nancy
1
Nancy

They’ve had plenty of time to move. Why can the homeless trash/burn our beautiful forest? Tax paying citizens are only allowed to camp for 14 days! What about the homeowners rights near China Hat, they need to feel safe in their own community! This has gone on way too long and I’m surprised!

Reply
Lynn Marie Leehmann
1
Lynn Marie Leehmann

If you look at the Federal Regulations for camping on Federal land it states only 14 days. These people have over stated their welcome, they need to go and they have known about this for at least six months.

Reply
Brad Aimone
1
Brad Aimone

It is ironic the Bend Equity Group has filed a lawsuit to block the closure. Where is the indignation for the horrible environmental damage done by these campers who’ve violated the USFS long standing limit of a 14 day stay in a primitive camp site?

Reply
Nancy Roquero
1
Nancy Roquero

This has gone on too long. The forests near Woodside community and other neighborhoods need fire protection and protection from the homeless with guns and vicious dogs and the garbage left behind. The homeless have had plenty of notice.

Reply
Lisa York
1
Lisa York

the USFS has been planning this burn since Oct 2019... more than enough time for the homeless/advocacy groups to come up with a plan to move...

Reply
Debbie Boyd
1
Debbie Boyd

This has been going on for way too long & it is ridiculous to postpone as they have known this needs to be done. The forest needs to be protected & these do gooders are too late to the game & so much time & money spent on homeless with ZERO results. We need DOGE. for Oregon!

Reply
pamcuny
0
pamcuny

I worry every year WHO is in the woods starting fires, whether deliberate or unintentional consequences…

Reply
Tammy Salka
0
Tammy Salka

The homeless are not residents, they are squatters!

Reply
Jeff Sanders
0
Jeff Sanders

I live near China Hat and used to love going out the with my dog. Once weapons started be pulled on people that stopped. I want my forest back. Good riddance to the whole lot. Don't ever come back.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

There needs to be more homeless shelters in the city!

Reply
Kim Kahl
0
Kim Kahl

The danger of fire starting in this area is incredibly high and impacts large subdivisions. It is mandatory to close this area for the safety of all. This should not be a place for camping to be allowed as it has been.

Reply
Are you concerned about the findings of the DA's investigation into Sheriff Van Der Kamp?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
854 Votes

Are you concerned about the findings of the DA's investigation into Sheriff Van Der Kamp?

Yes

9

No

1

Yes

9 Comments
Timothy MacGillivray
1
Timothy MacGillivray

He should be FIRED immediately as he is the individual in charge of the entire department. He must set the standard of honesty and integrity for both staff and the Public. What type of leader is this? Why is this even being questioned? He faced charges in La Mesa, California as well!

Reply
steven
0
steven

I just heard the recording. He lied about lying. Gotta go.

Reply
David Kline
0
David Kline

Sad to see this happen.

Reply
Susan Kate Mayer
0
Susan Kate Mayer

Good job DA! Glad someone is doing their job

Reply
Michael Hickey
0
Michael Hickey

Why is he still in this position, come on Deschutes Co. This is pathetic.

Reply
Laura Wattenbarger
0
Laura Wattenbarger

How can he be trusted to be truthful in anything if he lied about even just this one thing? A man in his position shouldn't be lying about anything at all and the fact that he did makes him untrustworthy 100%.

Reply
Anne King
0
Anne King

If he can't be honest about such a basic thing as his education, he can't be trusted with Deschutes County's safety! What else has he lied about? He should resign!

Reply

No

1 Comment
Steven Huillet
0
Steven Huillet

Just more Liberal attacks on Conservative. This is what they do because they lost the elections. Poor losers!

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT