Husker Max

Husker Max

huskermax.com
Everything you ever wanted to know about the Huskers www.huskermax.com
Should UCF have been included in the College Football Playoff?
Husker Max Asked by Husker Max
2/5/2018

Should UCF have been included in the College Football Playoff?

81%
Yes WINNER

24

19%
No

6

81%
Yes

24 Comments
John Bruckner
2
John Bruckner

Proved it on the field.

Reply
Jeff Rohr
1
Jeff Rohr

Absolutely. They had every right to be in the playoff. It's real simple for the schools that want to be in the playoff - DON'T LOSE. The fact that a smaller conference team simply cannot make the playoff is absurd.

Reply
Nicholas Barta
0
Nicholas Barta

the system is slanted toward the big conferences but should always take into account an unbeaten team from anywhere. UCF was not given the respect that they deserve and now we have two SEC teams and a national championship that nobody cares about.

Reply
Darrin Sollars
0
Darrin Sollars

12 and 0 no losses how could they not be playing what other teams have losses they just got screwed !

Reply
C.a. Cooper
0
C.a. Cooper

Undefeated and beat a top-ten team.

Reply
Brad Thompson
0
Brad Thompson

both Georgia and Ala lost.

Reply
David Weaver
0
David Weaver

I think any team in the FBS that goes undefeated and is the only undefeated team in the FBS should automatically seeded in the playoffs even if it's the 4th seed.

Reply
Douglas Herbst
0
Douglas Herbst

They went undefeated and should at least been given a shot

Reply
John Fillmore
0
John Fillmore

The evidence is pretty strong that UCF deserved to be in the playoff, having defeated Auburn, the team which beat both of the teams playing for the NC.

Reply
David Petersen
0
David Petersen

There needs to be more than four.

Reply
Sean Smith
0
Sean Smith

Invitational Playoffs are not real Playoffs, Ohio State and UCF should have been in, everyone says their schedule was weak, then let that show in the playoffs

Reply
Rizeabuv Yorzelf
0
Rizeabuv Yorzelf

Playoffs should be 8 Teams and not 4 Teams. All Power 5 Conf champs plus best records after that.

Reply
Peter Rygol
0
Peter Rygol

OU and Georgia scored over 100 combined in their game. Looked more like a track meet than a football game. I do not consider any team a #1 contender with defenses that give up that many points. Clemson couldn't score a TD, Only Bama looked like a #1 and I hate saying that. who's left? UCF

Reply
Kenneth. D. Magruder
0
Kenneth. D. Magruder

Considering that one of the teams that is playing for the national championship didnt even win the conference. NCAA needs to look at the other levels of football for palyoffs

Reply
Robert Lloyd
0
Robert Lloyd

It is all hindsight since they beat Auburn, but with hindsight being 20/20, yeah, they might be the best team in the country.

Reply
Melanie Sturm
0
Melanie Sturm

The current system is flawed, eliminating the possibility of unlikely, outlier contenders whose merit is proven most at the crushing end of a season -- like UCF.

Reply
Todd Meedel
0
Todd Meedel

UCF beat every team they faced, they did not pick their division.... The two teams in playoffs both have losses... Alabama did not win their division or their conference... This is favortisim towards the SEC... excludes teams who earned their right to be there.

Reply
T David Andrew M
0
T David Andrew M

The Current system is Bull, any team that is undefeated by this point in the season should have instant consideration. The system needs to be fixed.

Reply
Ruthie Patterson
0
Ruthie Patterson

They Should Have Been Giving A Chance They Were Good

Reply
Jack Bohlken
0
Jack Bohlken

UCF should share a split national championship with the AL - GA winner!

Reply
Dalton McMillin
0
Dalton McMillin

But wasn’t realistic. Let’s be honest. Even tho all Husker nation wanted a UCF win, very few thought there was a real chance. I knew they were good and had heart and great coaching but if a lot of us are honest we hoped UCF would be competitive.

Reply
Rick Fielder
0
Rick Fielder

They went undefeated

Reply
Arlie Rauch
0
Arlie Rauch

You have no idea how good they were, but they defeated everyone put in their way.

Reply

19%
No

6 Comments
Marty Tromburg
2
Marty Tromburg

Good team with great story, but no early Georgia Tech victory hurt their chances to get in Top 10 earlier.

Reply
Susan Hayes
0
Susan Hayes

Week in and week out in apower five conference.....good luck....ya gotta play defense!

Reply
Wade Williams
0
Wade Williams

Not under the current system. However, expand the playoff to 6 teams and make the New years 6 qualifier, one of the 6 teams if they are undefeated. Unless they are undefeated, the schedules of those teams will never come close to being strong enough to justify inclusion with a loss.

Reply
Tyler Brooks
0
Tyler Brooks

I believe UCF could have played with/beat any of the four playoff teams. But the strength of schedule just wasn't there to be fair to other teams in the playoff.

Reply
Andrew Epp
0
Andrew Epp

The 4 best teams were probably in. It just needs to be 8 to let the little guys have a chance.

Reply
Kris Chenault Fenske
0
Kris Chenault Fenske

How many teams would be undefeated with UCF's schedule? And If Scott Frost isn't involved, Husker fans wouldn't care.

Reply
Is the 34½-point spread against Akron about right?

Is the 34½-point spread against Akron about right?

Yes, the Huskers should roll.

2

No, too many issues need fixing.

10

Yes, the Huskers should roll.

2 Comments
Brad Bredenkamp
0
Brad Bredenkamp

They have the talent, they need to take the step of winning the games they should win in the manner they should win them. Don’t play down to the level of the opponent.

Reply
PJ SAid
0
PJ SAid

It better be...defense front should be fixed and Akron Defense should allow for deeper passes. At HOME at NIGHT!!! #GBR

Reply

No, too many issues need fixing.

10 Comments
Patrick O'Brien
0
Patrick O'Brien

We haven't seen enough of what this team can really do to give that kind of spread.

Reply
William Osler
0
William Osler

They are not a good team yet. Much work to do.

Reply
Alan Portsche
0
Alan Portsche

To many issues to fix

Reply
VAHuskerFan
0
VAHuskerFan

There is NOWAY they will cover, there just not that good, atleast at this point.

Reply
Melvyn Halfon
0
Melvyn Halfon

I do not believe some of the glaring problems with the run defense have not been fixed, and Akron will exploit them.

Reply
Danny Brown
0
Danny Brown

The D-line against Cincy wasn't overly impressive, our run game was relatively unproductive, and we had some lucky breaks (even if good play contributed). The next two weeks will be important for closing gaps; I don't think we'll wallop Akron quite by 30+ points. I'm guessing we end up 17

Reply
Ed Starke
0
Ed Starke

It's hard to beat any team by that big of a margin.

Reply
McV0id
0
McV0id

Defense needs more time to cook

Reply
Does Nebraska’s 20-17 win over Cincinnati signal resilience or concern?

Does Nebraska’s 20-17 win over Cincinnati signal resilience or concern?

Resilience outweighs how it happened

4

Narrow win raises red flags

20

Resilience outweighs how it happened

4 Comments
Eric Bildt
0
Eric Bildt

We lose this game every time for years. The culture is changing; the confidence is growing; the return to excellence is near. The old fogies who still wish bread was a dime will denigrate the O & D lines & malign the play calling. They forget how bad things have been. This is better. This was a win.

Reply
tmhedlund@hotmail.com
0
tmhedlund@hotmail.com

Many times in the past, the Huskers looked not so good against mediocre teams in nonconference, then got their act together for a good season. The Michigan game will be the real barometer.

Reply
Ryan Morrow
0
Ryan Morrow

this time last year, this would have been a loss. Their backs were on the ropes, but managed to pull the W instead. Still need to learn how to keep the foot on the gas, and not let up in all 4 quarters...

Reply
Mike Conyers
0
Mike Conyers

Bearcats are the Huskers of 2024. They found a way lose through penalties and turnovers.

Reply

Narrow win raises red flags

20 Comments
Rick
1
Rick

What I saw in the trenches is very concerning. Also, that rinky dink 3 yards and a cloud of dust by the throwing the ball offense won't get it done against the big boys.

Reply
John Fillmore
1
John Fillmore

D-line is a definite concern. No sacks, no real pressure on their QB especially - when it really counted,

Reply
Mac Kinder
1
Mac Kinder

N was fortunate to win. The O and D lines were underwhelming vs an average B12 team. 8-4 might be optimistic.

Reply
dksntpa
0
dksntpa

Should have put on SPY on the QB, if that dude takes off, hammer his ass, period! Inside D looks like a problem, gap containment, giant hole.

Reply
Joe Hegarty
0
Joe Hegarty

I don't think NU can play much better and to only squeeze out a win is concerning.

Reply
VAHuskerFan
0
VAHuskerFan

There is a lot to be concerned about!!

Reply
Loren Zimmerman
0
Loren Zimmerman

The only improvement I saw was only one stupid penalty. A 79% passing rating was overblown with two and three yard completions. D-Line got blown off the ball.

Reply
Linda Ogren
0
Linda Ogren

DUMB NOT KICK BALL TOM WOULD HAVE MAKE FIELD LONGER WE RUN OUT CLOCK COME ON COACH

Reply
David Levesque
0
David Levesque

Maybe the weakest run defense I have ever seen in an NU uniform. It was scary bad.

Reply
Joe Nigro
0
Joe Nigro

If Riola is the QB they say he is, Turn Him Loose! !

Reply
Roger Shriver
0
Roger Shriver

In the last 5 games in 2024 plus this game, NU has only managed to score more than 20 points once with Holgersen's play calling. The OL and DL wasn't impressive. The defense had trouble stopping the run even though Cincy couldn't throw effectively. Do not drink the Kool-Aid yet!

Reply
Bill Petty
0
Bill Petty

Last seven minutes, Cincy marches down the field and scores, Huskers can't put a final drive together and punt on 4th and 14. Cincy gets ball on the 10, marches, easily, down the field and, thankfully, throws the game away on a poorly executed pass in the end zone. we were dominated in the 4th qrt

Reply
Randy Essex
0
Randy Essex

No RB depth. Johnson is a star, but will get hurt early in the season if that load continues. D gashed by runs over and over. O didn’t finish drives.

Reply
Ron Joseph
0
Ron Joseph

When compared to preseason hype the win raises flags on what is real and what isn’t. The hype = 1995 levels for a team that at best may be a 7 or 8 win team

Reply
PJ SAid
0
PJ SAid

First off, Cincinatti is better team than Nebraska fans think. But, I was disappointed there is no RB2, Need more deep pass attempts, DLine is smallish & soft. Specail teams look okay so far. My win total has dropped to 7 or 8 vs. 9 wins.

Reply
Robert Lloyd
0
Robert Lloyd

We just aren't there yet. But thank God for our special teams. What a turn around. We need some linemen, both offense and defense.

Reply
Draven DiMera
0
Draven DiMera

OL showed zero improvement and DL definitely has downgraded. Only 1 legit RB. WRs struggled to get separation. Once again misled by the biased Nebraska media during the offseason. Exactly why I don't drink the Kool-Aid

Reply
William Osler
0
William Osler

Good teams always start better than this. Only slightly better than last year. Special Teams did not loose the game this time.

Reply
Dave Perry
0
Dave Perry

Offense should have scored more points. Look at the Illinois win.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT