Supreme court SquareOffs

Yes

0

No

0

Yes

No one has commented yet

No

No one has commented yet

Yes

7

No

1

Yes

Justin Booya
2
Justin Booya

Because it's the law and common sense. Cry more, democrats.

Reply
Lida Vitt
2
Lida Vitt

Because that is their job, and 100% voted that Trump SHOULD be on the ballot! That says it all.

Reply
Will Mason
2
Will Mason

There was no insurection. It was just a riot. Lying about a riot and calling it an insurrection for 3 years did not create one. An insurrection never happened.

Reply
Bill Spires
1
Bill Spires

Im not voting for Trump, however this is America and your innocent until proven guilty.

Reply
Vernon Taylor
1
Vernon Taylor

Of course they did. The no votes prove that.

Reply
Cindy L. Robinson
0
Cindy L. Robinson

there was NO insurrection

Reply

No

Michael Ridenhour
0
Michael Ridenhour

Judicial news and global attention: SCOTUS's decision, on basis of original language, its Tenth Amendment, and State's sovereignty, failed to protect the U.S. from amplified voice of money's arrogantly-owned fallacy. The unwritten law Lesser of Two Evils thus was allowed to dictate a ballot's vote.

Reply

Yes

1

No

1

Yes

Linda Swiney
0
Linda Swiney

If viagara is available by mail for men's health care, mifepristone should be available for women's health care. This being said, these are both medications that should require a prescription from a licensed medical doctor.

Reply

No

Max DeYoung
0
Max DeYoung

The Biden administration is already allowing fentanyl to be brought across the Southern border.

Reply

About Supreme court

Debates and polls on Supreme court from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT