Yes
No
Many still argue Trump shouldn't be able to run under the 14th Amendment.
Many still argue Trump shouldn't be able to run under the 14th Amendment.
Show Less
1
Comment
Michael Ridenhour
Judicial news and global attention: SCOTUS's decision, on basis of original language, its Tenth Amendment, and State's sovereignty, failed to protect the U.S. from amplified voice of money's arrogantly-owned fallacy. The unwritten law Lesser of Two Evils thus was allowed to dictate a ballot's vote.
Reply
Because it's the law and common sense. Cry more, democrats.
ReplyBecause that is their job, and 100% voted that Trump SHOULD be on the ballot! That says it all.
ReplyThere was no insurection. It was just a riot. Lying about a riot and calling it an insurrection for 3 years did not create one. An insurrection never happened.
ReplyIm not voting for Trump, however this is America and your innocent until proven guilty.
ReplyOf course they did. The no votes prove that.
Replythere was NO insurrection
Reply