Should cities get involved in gun regulations?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
1,228 Votes

Should cities get involved in gun regulations?

Yes

3

No

18

Yes

3 Comments
Harry Joel
0
Harry Joel

Because there needs to be control on guns and gun sales. Why does KESQ advertise guns of distinction on their evening news, I guess the station owner is fine with 146 murders this year already. This tacky disturbing ad should be removed. Horrible message to allow.

Reply
Shantae Carter
0
Shantae Carter

They should be able to for the pro-gun aspect of it all. Some cities like Prineville or smaller country towns are better at teaching and raising their kids with using the guns right and what they are intended for safely, other cities where they have more shootings should be ban guns to a degree

Reply
Les Adams
0
Les Adams

At the rate people are being gunned down, any municipality should be able to take protective steps. It isn't about feeling safe, it's about being more safe.

Reply
Native Oregonian
Native Oregonian

What's wrong with your logic is that we have something called a US Constitution. The city has no authority to be making up their own rules that go against our civil rights.

No

17 Comments
Marily Badger
3
Marily Badger

Giving gun stores more access to personal and medical info on a potential buyer is long overdue and an excellent way to address the issue. Trampling on gun owner second amendment rights so others can feel safe is just unconstitutional.

Reply
Britney Hamlin
2
Britney Hamlin

Law abiding citizens are protecting their families with their guns. I wouldn't shop anywhere I wasn't allowed to carry. For the exact reason of the Safeway shooting. I can't even imagine getting stuck in a store with a shooter and my kids without protection.

Reply
💛🖤 RAG 💛🖤
2
💛🖤 RAG 💛🖤

Criminals and crazies are the problem NOT guns!!

Reply
Sussie Due
1
Sussie Due

Our system is OK the way it is. Criminals don't use legally purchased guns that can be traced. So tighter regulation is not going to stop the problem.

Reply
Native Oregonian
1
Native Oregonian

They need to focus on local issues, not issues that are already being debated at the state level. They also shouldn't be endorcing measures that are unconstitutional such as 114. The Supreme Court has already ruled that most everything the City is in favor of will not pass constitutional scrutiny.

Reply
Christena
1
Christena

Lets work on where the problem lies, community, mental health, enforcing current regulation. In many cases people had guns illegally, therefore more regulation isn't the answer but helping to enforce current laws.

Reply
Marcus Ainsworth
1
Marcus Ainsworth

The CONSTITUTION clearly states people have the right to keep and bear arms that SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. What new law is a criminal going to all of a sudden decide to follow. Its already illegal to kill people yet people still do it. The heaviest gun controlled cities have the worst gun crime rates

Reply
Ron Johnson
1
Ron Johnson

They say it will be unlawful to carry a loaded gun in public. Does this mean the person with a concealed carry primit have to unload their gun when they leave the house to go out.

Reply
Pat Glandon
1
Pat Glandon

Leave it to Feds/states. Rules we have don't stop criminals and people with other issues. If cities want to do something take a look at mental health issues in their areas.

Reply
Nik Myles
0
Nik Myles

Regulating the law biding citizen from owning or purchasing guns and making the law biding citizen register their weapons will do nothing but regulate law biding citizens. Making the law biding citizen apply for a permit is unconstitutional. The 2nd amendment is my permit. Regulate lawless criminals

Reply
Russell Parker
0
Russell Parker

We already have back ground checks, you have to show photo ID, and be fingerprinted, along with being a resident of this state. It's not a gun problem, it's a people problem. Enforce the laws that we already have, and hold people accountable.

Reply
Kimmy Wasatch
0
Kimmy Wasatch

The federal government is chipping away at our rights, we don't need cities to try to also, Gun control will not help, criminals or people who want to do harm do not follow laws. Make them accountable, enforce drug laws. fund and respect the police, let them do their jab!

Reply
Rick Allen
0
Rick Allen

NO! Gun laws do nothing to help, in fact they create problems. New York's gun free zones are crazy wrong! How can anyone think that a criminal or a mentally ill 20 year old will abide by any law?? Kids that dont know God or a disciplining Father is the problem. Dem D A,s are another problem!

Reply
annie Oakley
0
annie Oakley

Funny how the other states with permit-to-purchase laws have much worse crime than Oregon. But yeah, let's do that...pfff!

Reply
Denise Jensen
0
Denise Jensen

Guns aren't the problem. Video games are the problem band video games not guns

Reply
Jim Hipp
0
Jim Hipp

The guns are already out there. Stupid intervention over 1 unusual event in this area.

Reply
Gabe West
0
Gabe West

Gun regulation won't work and is not the answer

Reply
Would you prefer to buy an environmentally-friendly vehicle?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
2,005 Votes

Would you prefer to buy an environmentally-friendly vehicle?

Yes, least I can do

12

No, too expensive

16

Yes, least I can do

7 Comments
George Pearson
4
George Pearson

I now own my second hybrid.

Reply
k san
1
k san

If they ever made one that could go longer distances. I have seen only 1 recharging station for such cars at Fred Meyer. To make them attractive, need many more recharging stations. Until then, no thx

Reply
Rachel
0
Rachel

I love my hybrid <3

Reply
Joseph Nelson
0
Joseph Nelson

My next vehicle will be an EV.

Reply
Torina Wilson
0
Torina Wilson

How about YES!, but it’s too expensive. Therefore, I’ll wait

Reply
Kerie Raymond
0
Kerie Raymond

We have an EV for local & shorter range trips (have gone to Vancourver, WA & Eugene, OR) and a Hybrid for longer range trips. Electricity is $10/month, and nothing once we have PV. No maintenance cost

Reply

No, too expensive

15 Comments
John Merrill
4
John Merrill

Because I want to make that choice being I'm a free individual in the United States of America. Free to make my own choices and not be told by a dictator governor of the State of Oregon. FDKB.

Reply
Fred Colbern
Fred Colbern

Government is already controlling you when you drive. Ever stop at a stoplight? That's some university indoctrinated bureaucrat deciding how long you will be made to sit there and wait for his little technocracy to "turn the light green" so you can go.

George Pearson
George Pearson

No one forced me! I love getting 50 mpg while gas guzzlers are paying my share!

GT Thomas
4
GT Thomas

I do not want a vehicle liberals try to force on me.

Reply
Bob A. Bui
Bob A. Bui

Screwing your kids/grandchildren to own the libs? Nice.

George Pearson
George Pearson

No one is forcing you! Watch something else beside Fox for a change, to get a full picture!

poor turtle
3
poor turtle

I mean I would but they are too expensive. Honestly I would rather to not drive at all and take the bus everywhere but that isn't currently realistic.

Reply
Karen Barker Rouse
2
Karen Barker Rouse

Can’t imagine it would make long road trips easy.

Reply
Kerie Raymond
Kerie Raymond

Not easy, but doable! Worth it in the long run.

Douglas E. Wilson
1
Douglas E. Wilson

We are being priced out of everything by so called do gooders!

Reply
Robert Northrup
1
Robert Northrup

If it would meet my needs yes. Unfortunately there are none currently that can.

Reply
Ed Drahos
0
Ed Drahos

The answer itself is explanatory enough. It's too expensive. Yet the charging situation isn't set up to be a reasonable solution. This is because the industry is totally out for reoccurring profits to charge for such electric vehicles. You can blame commercialism for this greed.

Reply
J H
0
J H

Because the majority are NOT truly environmentally friendly! Would consider a hybrid.

Reply
Christena
0
Christena

I've always wanted a hybrid but having my vehicles paid off it's just not worth it.

Reply
dan bob
0
dan bob

Although it’s environmentally friendly, it is far too expensive. Perhaps in the future when corporations become competitive in this area and sell vehicles at cheaper prices.

Reply
Hugh Jjggh
0
Hugh Jjggh

It’s not that it’s too expensive I just like gas powered cars and I love hearing the engine rev unfortunately kids today will never understand not only what that 3rd pedal is for but also a real car

Reply
Heidi Owen
0
Heidi Owen

Most people I know cannot afford them, but I'll bet kate brown can....

Reply
Kerie Raymond
Kerie Raymond

We were fortunate to buy an EV new with substantial discounts and rebates, credits. $16K for a $34K new car. I don't think it's too expensive.

Ben Wiborg
0
Ben Wiborg

Expensive or not the power cells are the problem when it come to disposal or manufacture.

Reply
Sam Ackerman
0
Sam Ackerman

NO, I will however buy a vehicle that fits my needs.

Reply
Is someone who lets their pet off-leash in restricted areas considered a 'bad pet owner?'
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
871 Votes

Is someone who lets their pet off-leash in restricted areas considered a 'bad pet owner?'

Yes

6

No

5

Yes

6 Comments
Kristi Murdock
1
Kristi Murdock

Even a friendly dog with excellent recall can cause real problems for the owner walking their reactive dog on leash; a dog running free is highly exciting to other dogs; it's not fair for the owner of the reactive dog to have to deal with that overstimulation in a "leash only" area.

Reply
robert weber
robert weber

I recently I commented that it is not fair. But your comment makes me feel incorrect. I have had a reactive dog before and I feel that your comment is valid.

Kati Magana
0
Kati Magana

If it is a law and you break it regardless of what it refers to that is breaking the law- which by definition is criminal. If you put your pet in a situation that is unsafe that is your responsibility and ergo you are a bad pet owner. Pets are like our kids, it's our job to keep them safe.

Reply
Kim Ritchie
0
Kim Ritchie

yes because they are putting their dog as well as people with leashed pets at risk. Not all dogs like other dogs and not all people are comfortable with strange dogs running up to them.

Reply
Ann Thomas
0
Ann Thomas

There are laws and rules for a reason. No one should think that laws and rules don't apply to them. If they want their dog off leash then go out in the woods where no one else is or to a fenced dog park.

Reply
Deborah Albright
0
Deborah Albright

BECAUSE most dog owners that do this have zero respect for others or property.. NEVER pick up poop and feel entitled

Reply
Nic Secor
0
Nic Secor

There are leash laws for good reason. On a side note Bend Parks and Recreation need to put up signs at dog parks reminding owners that they are liable for damages their dogs cause to other dogs or humans under Oregon law. Bend PD treat dog parks like they are outside of their jurisdiction.

Reply

No

4 Comments
Amanda Jones
1
Amanda Jones

A bad dog owner is someone who is not able to care of the animal or mistreats the animal. The person is just not considerate of others and will break the law for whatever reason they may have. *if you have an aggressive dog it is the OWNERS responsibility to keep the dog under control anywhere

Reply
Payton Dixson
1
Payton Dixson

There are many factors, if your dog has great recall and obeys to stay in a heal being off leash is fine as the dog is still in verbal control. Dogs that do not listen should not be off leash.

Reply
k san
0
k san

No, that's too big a generalization. However, those owners should never let their pet off-leash in those areas.

Reply
robert weber
0
robert weber

Maybe there pet is trusted and not reactive. Why does a none relative happy pet need to be restricted?

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT