Should cities get involved in gun regulations?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
1226 Votes

Should cities get involved in gun regulations?

Yes

3

No

18

Yes

3 Comments
Harry Joel
0
Harry Joel

Because there needs to be control on guns and gun sales. Why does KESQ advertise guns of distinction on their evening news, I guess the station owner is fine with 146 murders this year already. This tacky disturbing ad should be removed. Horrible message to allow.

Reply
Shantae Carter
0
Shantae Carter

They should be able to for the pro-gun aspect of it all. Some cities like Prineville or smaller country towns are better at teaching and raising their kids with using the guns right and what they are intended for safely, other cities where they have more shootings should be ban guns to a degree

Reply
Les Adams
0
Les Adams

At the rate people are being gunned down, any municipality should be able to take protective steps. It isn't about feeling safe, it's about being more safe.

Reply
Native Oregonian
Native Oregonian

What's wrong with your logic is that we have something called a US Constitution. The city has no authority to be making up their own rules that go against our civil rights.

No

18 Comments
Marily Badger
3
Marily Badger

Giving gun stores more access to personal and medical info on a potential buyer is long overdue and an excellent way to address the issue. Trampling on gun owner second amendment rights so others can feel safe is just unconstitutional.

Reply
Britney Hamlin
2
Britney Hamlin

Law abiding citizens are protecting their families with their guns. I wouldn't shop anywhere I wasn't allowed to carry. For the exact reason of the Safeway shooting. I can't even imagine getting stuck in a store with a shooter and my kids without protection.

Reply
💛🖤 RAG 💛🖤
2
💛🖤 RAG 💛🖤

Criminals and crazies are the problem NOT guns!!

Reply
Sussie Due
1
Sussie Due

Our system is OK the way it is. Criminals don't use legally purchased guns that can be traced. So tighter regulation is not going to stop the problem.

Reply
Native Oregonian
1
Native Oregonian

They need to focus on local issues, not issues that are already being debated at the state level. They also shouldn't be endorcing measures that are unconstitutional such as 114. The Supreme Court has already ruled that most everything the City is in favor of will not pass constitutional scrutiny.

Reply
Christena
1
Christena

Lets work on where the problem lies, community, mental health, enforcing current regulation. In many cases people had guns illegally, therefore more regulation isn't the answer but helping to enforce current laws.

Reply
Marcus Ainsworth
1
Marcus Ainsworth

The CONSTITUTION clearly states people have the right to keep and bear arms that SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. What new law is a criminal going to all of a sudden decide to follow. Its already illegal to kill people yet people still do it. The heaviest gun controlled cities have the worst gun crime rates

Reply
Ron Johnson
1
Ron Johnson

They say it will be unlawful to carry a loaded gun in public. Does this mean the person with a concealed carry primit have to unload their gun when they leave the house to go out.

Reply
Pat Glandon
1
Pat Glandon

Leave it to Feds/states. Rules we have don't stop criminals and people with other issues. If cities want to do something take a look at mental health issues in their areas.

Reply
Nik Myles
0
Nik Myles

Regulating the law biding citizen from owning or purchasing guns and making the law biding citizen register their weapons will do nothing but regulate law biding citizens. Making the law biding citizen apply for a permit is unconstitutional. The 2nd amendment is my permit. Regulate lawless criminals

Reply
Russell Parker
0
Russell Parker

We already have back ground checks, you have to show photo ID, and be fingerprinted, along with being a resident of this state. It's not a gun problem, it's a people problem. Enforce the laws that we already have, and hold people accountable.

Reply
Kimmy Wasatch
0
Kimmy Wasatch

The federal government is chipping away at our rights, we don't need cities to try to also, Gun control will not help, criminals or people who want to do harm do not follow laws. Make them accountable, enforce drug laws. fund and respect the police, let them do their jab!

Reply
Rick Allen
0
Rick Allen

NO! Gun laws do nothing to help, in fact they create problems. New York's gun free zones are crazy wrong! How can anyone think that a criminal or a mentally ill 20 year old will abide by any law?? Kids that dont know God or a disciplining Father is the problem. Dem D A,s are another problem!

Reply
annie Oakley
0
annie Oakley

Funny how the other states with permit-to-purchase laws have much worse crime than Oregon. But yeah, let's do that...pfff!

Reply
Denise Jensen
0
Denise Jensen

Guns aren't the problem. Video games are the problem band video games not guns

Reply
Jim Hipp
0
Jim Hipp

The guns are already out there. Stupid intervention over 1 unusual event in this area.

Reply
Gabe West
0
Gabe West

Gun regulation won't work and is not the answer

Reply
Should House Speaker Mike Johnson be removed from his role?

Should House Speaker Mike Johnson be removed from his role?

Yes

0

No

1

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

1 Comment
Patricia Bond
0
Patricia Bond

The Republicans are able to move some items through Mr. Johnson. However, the Republicans are really not interested in governing but of creating chaos.

Reply
Which Madonna song is more iconic?
Extra Asked by Extra
2163 Votes

Which Madonna song is more iconic?

Like a Virgin

7

Vogue

8

Like a Virgin

7 Comments
Bonita D
0
Bonita D

I guess because it was one of her earliest songs and what helped launch her career.

Reply
Brian Klein
0
Brian Klein

The controversy around the topic makes this one a bigger deal.

Reply
Jim Foley
0
Jim Foley

Parodied and best vocals

Reply
Floki Thornburg
0
Floki Thornburg

Like a Virgin was covered by Weird Al. I heard Weird Al's version first before I ever listened to Madonna.

Reply
Kerri Marvel
0
Kerri Marvel

I went through my 20s listening to that song. It was considered to be so controversial at the time. I like the beat better than the other song in the poll.

Reply
Tracey Crowder
0
Tracey Crowder

it was the most popular song ever

Reply
Alyssa Peters
0
Alyssa Peters

I was 13 when this song and album was released. At the time, I didn't understand many of the lyrics at 13 years of age. The entire album fascinated me, yes I had this on vinyl. I was a huge fan fur years and years. I wore a college paper on Madonna and her contribution to the empowerment of women.

Reply

Vogue

8 Comments
Stephen Fuller
1
Stephen Fuller

DUDE Vogue was the All-time Dance, Party,get on the dance floor,Bob Ya Head Top down just What it Do song , YA HEARD!!!🙊🙉🙈😎

Reply
Theressa Funches Brown
1
Theressa Funches Brown

Everyone was doing the vogue even men and every nationality

Reply
Cherokee Gresham
0
Cherokee Gresham

Vogue was agead of its time. Madonna also wasn't afraid to embrace AND defend what we call LGBTQIA+ today. In that regard, she gave ZERO F***S! That's a TRUE ICON!

Reply
Mike Aronow
0
Mike Aronow

Because it's possibly the only dance moves I can do.

Reply
Ken Weis
0
Ken Weis

Is because I know it is the Song Vogue, cause I Dance to all of Madonna's songs

Reply
Rosemary Knowles
0
Rosemary Knowles

It is one of the most recognizable songs she has done. Without any doubt!

Reply
Darnella Miller
0
Darnella Miller

Ladies with an attitude, fellows that were in the mood. Don't just stand there let's get to it, strike a pose there's nothing to it. Vogue! "I mean come on... classic!"

Reply
Colleen Neumann
0
Colleen Neumann

This song and video are a work of ART!!!

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT