Should cities get involved in gun regulations?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
1226 Votes

Should cities get involved in gun regulations?

Yes

3

No

18

Yes

3 Comments
Harry Joel
0
Harry Joel

Because there needs to be control on guns and gun sales. Why does KESQ advertise guns of distinction on their evening news, I guess the station owner is fine with 146 murders this year already. This tacky disturbing ad should be removed. Horrible message to allow.

Reply
Shantae Carter
0
Shantae Carter

They should be able to for the pro-gun aspect of it all. Some cities like Prineville or smaller country towns are better at teaching and raising their kids with using the guns right and what they are intended for safely, other cities where they have more shootings should be ban guns to a degree

Reply
Les Adams
0
Les Adams

At the rate people are being gunned down, any municipality should be able to take protective steps. It isn't about feeling safe, it's about being more safe.

Reply
Native Oregonian
Native Oregonian

What's wrong with your logic is that we have something called a US Constitution. The city has no authority to be making up their own rules that go against our civil rights.

No

18 Comments
Marily Badger
3
Marily Badger

Giving gun stores more access to personal and medical info on a potential buyer is long overdue and an excellent way to address the issue. Trampling on gun owner second amendment rights so others can feel safe is just unconstitutional.

Reply
Britney Hamlin
2
Britney Hamlin

Law abiding citizens are protecting their families with their guns. I wouldn't shop anywhere I wasn't allowed to carry. For the exact reason of the Safeway shooting. I can't even imagine getting stuck in a store with a shooter and my kids without protection.

Reply
💛🖤 RAG 💛🖤
2
💛🖤 RAG 💛🖤

Criminals and crazies are the problem NOT guns!!

Reply
Sussie Due
1
Sussie Due

Our system is OK the way it is. Criminals don't use legally purchased guns that can be traced. So tighter regulation is not going to stop the problem.

Reply
Native Oregonian
1
Native Oregonian

They need to focus on local issues, not issues that are already being debated at the state level. They also shouldn't be endorcing measures that are unconstitutional such as 114. The Supreme Court has already ruled that most everything the City is in favor of will not pass constitutional scrutiny.

Reply
Christena
1
Christena

Lets work on where the problem lies, community, mental health, enforcing current regulation. In many cases people had guns illegally, therefore more regulation isn't the answer but helping to enforce current laws.

Reply
Marcus Ainsworth
1
Marcus Ainsworth

The CONSTITUTION clearly states people have the right to keep and bear arms that SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. What new law is a criminal going to all of a sudden decide to follow. Its already illegal to kill people yet people still do it. The heaviest gun controlled cities have the worst gun crime rates

Reply
Ron Johnson
1
Ron Johnson

They say it will be unlawful to carry a loaded gun in public. Does this mean the person with a concealed carry primit have to unload their gun when they leave the house to go out.

Reply
Pat Glandon
1
Pat Glandon

Leave it to Feds/states. Rules we have don't stop criminals and people with other issues. If cities want to do something take a look at mental health issues in their areas.

Reply
Nik Myles
0
Nik Myles

Regulating the law biding citizen from owning or purchasing guns and making the law biding citizen register their weapons will do nothing but regulate law biding citizens. Making the law biding citizen apply for a permit is unconstitutional. The 2nd amendment is my permit. Regulate lawless criminals

Reply
Russell Parker
0
Russell Parker

We already have back ground checks, you have to show photo ID, and be fingerprinted, along with being a resident of this state. It's not a gun problem, it's a people problem. Enforce the laws that we already have, and hold people accountable.

Reply
Kimmy Wasatch
0
Kimmy Wasatch

The federal government is chipping away at our rights, we don't need cities to try to also, Gun control will not help, criminals or people who want to do harm do not follow laws. Make them accountable, enforce drug laws. fund and respect the police, let them do their jab!

Reply
Rick Allen
0
Rick Allen

NO! Gun laws do nothing to help, in fact they create problems. New York's gun free zones are crazy wrong! How can anyone think that a criminal or a mentally ill 20 year old will abide by any law?? Kids that dont know God or a disciplining Father is the problem. Dem D A,s are another problem!

Reply
annie Oakley
0
annie Oakley

Funny how the other states with permit-to-purchase laws have much worse crime than Oregon. But yeah, let's do that...pfff!

Reply
Denise Jensen
0
Denise Jensen

Guns aren't the problem. Video games are the problem band video games not guns

Reply
Jim Hipp
0
Jim Hipp

The guns are already out there. Stupid intervention over 1 unusual event in this area.

Reply
Gabe West
0
Gabe West

Gun regulation won't work and is not the answer

Reply
Which show is more binge worthy? (The Office vs Parks and Rec)

Which show is more binge worthy? (The Office vs Parks and Rec)

The Office

22

Parks and Rec

3

The Office

22 Comments
Dwight Schrute
3
Dwight Schrute

Because the jokes just never get old, MICHAEL SCOTT NEVER GETS OLD OKAY PARKS AND REC DOES DONT @ ME

Reply
Sarah M
2
Sarah M

It’s just simply the best show on netflix

Reply
Waira
2
Waira

The Office has to be in my top 5 favorite shows of all time.

Reply
Claire Lewis
1
Claire Lewis

You can watch the episodes out of order on the office

Reply
Jordan Wang
1
Jordan Wang

even though it has its ups and downs, it’s peak is for sure better than parks and rec. also it has a way more satisfying Finale and Michael Scott is the best

Reply
nepter1
1
nepter1

f u n n y i f y o u u n d e r s t a n d i t

Reply
MetalWoof
1
MetalWoof

Parks and rec is definitely a good show but The Office just has much more rewatch value, they’re made in slightly different ways and are different to experience

Reply
creeper_killer5
1
creeper_killer5

It’s so much funnier

Reply
Swavy Wavy
1
Swavy Wavy

It’s easy to get addicted to

Reply
sof.iiiaaa28 My dudes
1
sof.iiiaaa28 My dudes

this jawn is funny amazing and once you watch all of the seasons you can restart and realized things you never did before and episodes up forgot about

Reply
Austin Mitchell
1
Austin Mitchell

The office is Funnier and the main character in parks is annoying I couldn’t stand another episode

Reply
Braden Kobeski
0
Braden Kobeski

Hands down my favorite show!

Reply
Lindsay Gant
0
Lindsay Gant

This was a hard choice but The Office characters stick with me!

Reply
Sai Gohel
0
Sai Gohel

Currently watching it all over again

Reply
Aidan Nicholson
0
Aidan Nicholson

look i love parks and rec but the office is more binge worthy

Reply
Rachel Abudaram
0
Rachel Abudaram

Because I love this show it’s funny

Reply
Melissa Marie Wells
0
Melissa Marie Wells

It’s funnier and the characters are better as well.

Reply
Drew Smith
0
Drew Smith

Dwight & Jim. Nuff’ said.

Reply
Mike Aronow
0
Mike Aronow

Michael Scott is one of TV's funniest characters ever.

Reply
Rachel Clara Smith
0
Rachel Clara Smith

It honestly depends on my mood though... They're both so good!!

Reply

Parks and Rec

3 Comments
Melissa Mlynek-Peplinski
3
Melissa Mlynek-Peplinski

Lil' Sebastian. Treat yo' self!

Reply
Matt Mann
0
Matt Mann

It's a tighter ship to sail the whole series... The office gets a little clunky near the end

Reply
Gamer Kid
0
Gamer Kid

Not better but definitely more binge worthy cuz there are more jokes that keep u entertained for a longer time.

Reply
Should Kurt Russell and Goldie Hawn get married?

Should Kurt Russell and Goldie Hawn get married?

Yes

7

No

25

Yes

7 Comments
Mary Austin
0
Mary Austin

After All this time, neither one is going anywhere, so just Do It!

Reply
Jay Jones II
0
Jay Jones II

They been in love for a long time. So why not?

Reply
Lucian Terry
0
Lucian Terry

They make a wonderful couple and they look great together.

Reply
Donna Moe
0
Donna Moe

Simply selfish reasons. Just love this couple They should get married if they want to...

Reply
Elizabeth DeCarolis
0
Elizabeth DeCarolis

marriage is a good thing

Reply
Soledad Nunez
0
Soledad Nunez

It has been established that the relationship works, so I mean, the union so make it official.

Reply
Cynthia Castor-Morales
0
Cynthia Castor-Morales

Because they are awesome together! Love 'em both!

Reply

No

25 Comments
Doris Havens
1
Doris Havens

They’ve been going strong for 40 years. Why screw up a good thing now!

Reply
Awilda Selpa
1
Awilda Selpa

After so many years , I say NO

Reply
Becky Lucas
1
Becky Lucas

They have been happy for 40 years without the paper.

Reply
Denise Scott
0
Denise Scott

They are been doing there thing so why clown up. Being married may do a hard times. Great love you both, and I have follow your movie's. Love you guy stay single married. LOL

Reply
Sandra J
0
Sandra J

Why fix it, if isn't broke, they probably wouldn't last this long if they were married.....

Reply
Myrna Vasquez
0
Myrna Vasquez

If it ain't broke, don't fix it.. ...with a piece of jinxed paper

Reply
Bonnie Wells
0
Bonnie Wells

Every time someone marries after years of being together, they end up splitting up. I don't want that for these two sweet people.

Reply
Canon Lyn
0
Canon Lyn

Why would they if they don't want to? Both are wealthy in their own right so why comingle things and make it complicated? No reason to whatsoever.

Reply
Renee Richards
0
Renee Richards

If it’s not broken, why change anything.

Reply
B K
0
B K

If it ain't broken don't fix it. They've been ok all these years, don't ruin a good thing

Reply
Nathalie V
0
Nathalie V

Why ruin a good thing. They’ve both been married to others before, and that didn’t go well. They’re pretty much settled and comfortable. Plus aren’t they common law in California? 😉

Reply
Catherine Lutz
0
Catherine Lutz

Why wreck a good thing? People love their autonomy.

Reply
Kathy Stormo
0
Kathy Stormo

Just a piece of paper Their love is what matters ❤️

Reply
Diane Moquin
0
Diane Moquin

If it's not broke, don't fix it. They have loved and cherish each other for 40 years. They have found eternal happiness.

Reply
Doris Kopp Stevens
0
Doris Kopp Stevens

Why spoil the good thing they have going with marriage.

Reply
Maribel
0
Maribel

They been going strong for so long why get married now if there happy and content .. ❤️

Reply
Paula Hall Lords-Kenny
0
Paula Hall Lords-Kenny

What they have is already working. No need for a piece of paper.

Reply
Y Williams
0
Y Williams

They both have already been down that path before, and they have 40 years together without a certificate and they are HAPPY & MARRIED in their Own Union.

Reply
Mike Nunez
0
Mike Nunez

Why ruin a good thing They got going ... God bless them with another 40 years

Reply
Maureen Kennedy
0
Maureen Kennedy

They had their family and continue to have an AMAZING life together ❤️

Reply
Michele Szymanski Ruffino
0
Michele Szymanski Ruffino

If it ain't broke don't fix it.

Reply
JMC
0
JMC

He probably has before!...We don't know...If it's not broke..What are we fixing then???

Reply
Fatara Thomas
0
Fatara Thomas

They love with this strong this long why change it

Reply
Jacob Franks
0
Jacob Franks

I mean if Goldie really wants it and is like bugging him about it then maybe he should do it but only if he wants to.

Reply
Jacob Franks
0
Jacob Franks

Marriage is only a business contract anyway, they've been together for almost half a century, does it really matter?

Reply
Who to Follow
Saya
Andu

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT