Would you prefer to pump your own gas or not?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
1,439 Votes

Would you prefer to pump your own gas or not?

Yes, it's faster!

15

No, don't want to.

26

Yes, it's faster!

14 Comments
Dkayla Byers
0
Dkayla Byers

yeah because you could die from corona

Reply
k san
0
k san

Absolutely! Coming from states where you do pump your own, it is definitely faster. At places like Fred Meyer that serve many people, attendants don’t always get to the people who got there 1st. Arg!

Reply
Mike Aronow
0
Mike Aronow

Yes, but, I wish they all had those clips that allowed you to start fueling and then hang out in your car until the tank was full. Some still do, but, I feel like they're increasingly rare.

Reply
sharder8
0
sharder8

Nothing like waiting for the employee to finally get to refueling your car and then waiting again for the employee to hang up the hose. Having said that, I do use full service when in medically need.

Reply
Gina Ricketts
0
Gina Ricketts

Because I can get in and out quick and don't have to wait in line for gas station employees who are the slowest individuals in the free universe lol!

Reply
Doug Paris
0
Doug Paris

Because I'm not lazy and I am not incompetent-it is faster and in tune with the vast majority of the other 49 states-can't believe Oregon is still living in the dark ages-MG what is wrong with you pep

Reply
Keith Uht
Keith Uht

48. New Jersey is like Oregon.

Ka San
0
Ka San

Yes, absolutely!!! I've only lived in Bend for 3 years, and I find it slow and inconvenient. Even in bad weather, I'd rather not wait for an attendant.

Reply
Len Parsons
0
Len Parsons

And the price for self service needs to be less than full service

Reply
Diane Springstead Cole
0
Diane Springstead Cole

Growing up in Ohio I've pumped gas for years. I never minded it.

Reply
Susan Keith
0
Susan Keith

It is better for the environment as the nozzle does not remain in the tank with fumes escaping until the attendant is able to return to your vehicle.

Reply
GT Thomas
0
GT Thomas

You do not have to but it should be your choice.

Reply
Steven Huillet
0
Steven Huillet

Gas prices would be cheaper for one thing and service would be much faster!

Reply
Adam Hollman
0
Adam Hollman

Let station owners decide how to serve their customers and then consumers can choose where to buy. I prefer to just take care of it myself rather than wait until the attendant gets around to me.

Reply

No, don't want to.

26 Comments
Pam W
2
Pam W

I don't want to take jobs away from anyone. That is why I won't use the self serve in Walmart either.

Reply
Patricia Morris
1
Patricia Morris

Came from a state where you had to pump my own gas and it is not easy to do in your 80’s

Reply
Nik Myles
1
Nik Myles

This is a job killer bill

Reply
champagne dog
1
champagne dog

Why would I want to pump gas. I love full service gas stations and often tip the attendants. Self service gas pumps equals loss of jobs and inconvenience for customers. Please Oregon, stay unique.

Reply
Karen Schwecke Bates
1
Karen Schwecke Bates

i just had back surgery - definitely not pumping my own gas. Plus, we travel in between Washington and California - I love the fact that we can come back to Oregon and not have to get out of the car

Reply
Lida Vitt
0
Lida Vitt

Because it's quite clear that they have not been able to control the violence! They/Dems have allowed this by being a sanctuary city. That harbor criminals that harm their own US citizens, and police.

Reply
Christena
0
Christena

It creates jobs, it's convenient. I don't really care either way but it's nice.

Reply
Danni
0
Danni

I'm old, disabled, and way too stupid to figure out how it works. Do you think women all dressed up for a date want to arrive smelling of gasoline?

Reply
Leslie Ann
0
Leslie Ann

I've poor health and greatly appreciate those who work hard and pump my gas. They need jobs too.

Reply
Rod Blower
0
Rod Blower

We have voted on this many times, and it has always been bnb 9ted down

Reply
Toni Ayers
0
Toni Ayers

Why is everyone in such a hurry? Waste too much time on social media perhaps?

Reply
Linda Starr Williams
0
Linda Starr Williams

NO NO AND HELL NO!!!!

Reply
Kathryn Kinney Evans
0
Kathryn Kinney Evans

Just not a good idea all around.

Reply
Linda Nolin
0
Linda Nolin

I have never had so much trouble getting gas as when I went on a trip to Az. last year. Can't use cash and couldn't get the gas to start because every pump is different. Had to get help several times.

Reply
Robert Northrup
0
Robert Northrup

The excuse that pumping gas is dangerous is ridiculous. Millions of people pump gas everyday without injury to themselves, others or their vehicle. It is worth it to me to pay for the service.

Reply
Gary Hatherill
0
Gary Hatherill

I don't mind, either way. But didn't I hear the law says the price has to stay the same?

Reply
Erica Crossan
0
Erica Crossan

Because I don't want to smell like gas or get out in the weather. I also don't want to go inside if I pay with cash

Reply
Judy Fisher
0
Judy Fisher

Self-pumping gas in Oregon would eliminate those jobs for people who currently do this service.

Reply
Nancy Cook
0
Nancy Cook

I think safety and security are both issues. A hired attendant is a safer option, especially for women in a car alone.

Reply
Leota Evans
0
Leota Evans

Because I like having my gas pumped.. I've never pumped my gas in Oregon... native Oregonian.. More jobs for Oregon... We don't need people being in a hurry pumping there own gas...slow down

Reply
Loni Jewell
0
Loni Jewell

The amount of jobs that would be lost seems would be a blow to a part of the community that already struggles to afford the cost of living in our area. Job elimination for convenience, no way!

Reply
Anthony Dehart
0
Anthony Dehart

It's just a start to be 100% self service and at full price

Reply
Ann Harbert Evensen
0
Ann Harbert Evensen

At my age, I just would rather not have to pump my own.

Reply
Bob Majka
0
Bob Majka

It sucks having to pump your own gas in inclement weather. Let someone get paid to do it!

Reply
Karen Rickard Smith
0
Karen Rickard Smith

why put someone out of a job!!!

Reply
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

It kills jobs, pluse who want to pump there own gas in the winter

Reply
Would you rather see Tim Burton make a new Batman movie or Sam Raimi make a new Spider-Man movie?

Would you rather see Tim Burton make a new Batman movie or Sam Raimi make a new Spider-Man movie?

Burton Batman

0

Raimi Spider-Man

11

Burton Batman

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

Raimi Spider-Man

11 Comments
Benjamin Szczegolski-Jacobs
1
Benjamin Szczegolski-Jacobs

I like Raimi as a director more and frankly seeing the first draught of the 89 script makes me like Burton even less. Havent ever really loved 89 as much as others to begin with, sonce I didnt grow up with it.

Reply
Mutale Mwananshiku
1
Mutale Mwananshiku

Raimi cause at least he loves spider-man and would try to make a character driven story about peter , whereas burton doesnt care for batman and another batman film by him would be all visuals and not a character driven story about batman.

Reply
Andrew Cozzini
1
Andrew Cozzini

Burton Batman, while still a notable and fondly remembered version, is (imo) seeming less influential and culturally relevant the more years that have passed since its release. Conversely, Sam Raimi's Spider-Man seems way more influential again, and is, for me, the more definitive take of the two!

Reply
Spencer Nielsen
1
Spencer Nielsen

Easy! Burton has yet to make a good Batman movie, Raimi made two great films with Spider-Man.

Reply
rockmanlp
0
rockmanlp

Burton is much less talented

Reply
Smol-Vampire
0
Smol-Vampire

I want Raimi to redeem himself for the biggest let down

Reply
Jay-El Lewis
0
Jay-El Lewis

While I enjoyed both Sam just had more films, Norton only had that one Batman film with Michael Keaton

Reply
Robert Wild
0
Robert Wild

The Raimi Spider-man films feel like an overarching story without a satisfying ending. I just have more nostalgia for Raimi Spider-man. Literally nothing would make me happier than hearing that elfman spider-man score over the opening credits of a new Raimi Spider-man movie one more time.

Reply
Chewbaacca's Lover
0
Chewbaacca's Lover

It would be a harder choice if it was the Keaton universe without Burton, even than I might have to go with Spider Man, Raimi is the easy choice with Burton the way he is now.

Reply
SpedeVesku
0
SpedeVesku

Burton's best days are behind him and even during those he wasn't perfect. Raimi still seems to "got it", even if I haven't loved all of his more recent work either. Plus, his Spider-Man movies ended on a worse note than Burton's Batmans, so there's a bigger need for redemption.

Reply
Jedi Knight
0
Jedi Knight

Now I assume that both Tim Burton and Sam Raimi are very different people than when they left their projects, but since there's been less time in between 2007 and now than there is 1992 and now, I assume that Raimi has retained more of his sensibilities that made his version work.

Reply
Should President Trump continue to pursue a United States takeover of Greenland?

Should President Trump continue to pursue a United States takeover of Greenland?

Yes

10

No

7

Yes

3 Comments
Vanessa Vaughan
0
Vanessa Vaughan

I ignored it just like Republican lawmakers ignore takkng a bigger stance on control on school shootings. All they do is give meaningless mouth service the whole time pocketing money from NRA lobbyists. I don't want to take anyone's guns from them, but our children should feel safe.

Reply
Felicia Megan
0
Felicia Megan

He needs to chill.

Reply
Max
0
Max

Trump got the deal today January 21st.. Trump helps Americans again. Daily.

Reply
Max
Max

Fred, keep reading CNN. LOL

Fred
Fred

There are two ways to be fooled: One is to believe what isn't true, and the other is to refuse to believe what is true. ― Soren Kierkegaard

No

6 Comments
Nancy Sims-VanBuren
1
Nancy Sims-VanBuren

He has us at odds with our allies, our adversaries and within our own nation due to the extreme violence with the ICE issue... civil unrest...

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

Steven Watson
1
Steven Watson

He is completely insane. He and his cabinet want the natural resources, like Venezuela oil!!!

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

Bryan Jones
1
Bryan Jones

We already have a military presence in Greenland. Denmark is a NATO ally. Trump should NOT be threatening the European balance or the time-tested established order. This has ramifications far beyond Trump's ego.

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

0571953
1
0571953

US should not invade other countries. Never Greenland or Venezuela. This is Trump enriching himself. Dangerous and destroying US reputation on human rights.

Reply
Max
Max

He didn't invade them.

Denzel McVeigh
1
Denzel McVeigh

You don't own this country and you can't own Greenland matter of fact go away you prick

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

Kevin Blount
1
Kevin Blount

We have existing agreements with Greenland and Denmark regarding military bases. We should expand on that, rather than threaten to take the entire country by force 'if necessary'

Reply
Max
Max

Trump made a deal that everyone loves. All over the EU.

Who to Follow
KTVZ
Saya

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT