Do you think the home energy score should be required for home sellers?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
653 Votes

Do you think the home energy score should be required for home sellers?

Yes!

0

No!

9

Yes!

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No!

9 Comments
Gabe West
1
Gabe West

To much government control

Reply
Salli Mc
1
Salli Mc

Too much govt control. Let us beware and decide for ourselves.

Reply
Bob Majka
1
Bob Majka

No, after moving every 2-4 years, lived in 9 states and 3 of those states multiple times the last thing on your mind is the energy score. If in doubt and you have the option of waiting, ask for one.

Reply
k san
0
k san

Don't home inspections show you everything you need to know?

Reply
Rick Allen
0
Rick Allen

So tired of the Democrats socialist, Marxist control nonsense, this is America not a socialist country!

Reply
Gary Everett
0
Gary Everett

Another bureaucratic over reach to fit their agenda with no consideration for the consequences, cost, etc.

Reply
Neva Strong
0
Neva Strong

This extra cost will be more than just the cost of a score; the City of Bend will charge a filing fee with the City to track these scores and the ECC committee knows it won't make a difference with climate goals because owners aren't required to do any updates - YET.

Reply
Lester Friedman
0
Lester Friedman

Buyers can have one done, at their own expense, just like a home inspection, as part of their purchase if they want one. Why does the seller have to pay unless the city's purpose is to force sellers to spend money for improvements they will not benefit from? Let the party who will benefit pay.

Reply
Jon Krutsch
0
Jon Krutsch

Dumb to require it. When people are bidding on houses and paying $70k over asking, the energy score is the last thing they consider. It should be a voluntary, ask if you want it, basis.

Reply
Should the Oregon legislature create Charlie Kirk day?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
456 Votes

Should the Oregon legislature create Charlie Kirk day?

Yes

1

No

17

Yes

1 Comment
LuLyn Howard
0
LuLyn Howard

Charlie Kirk was a man of faith and gave his very life for the values I stand for. He was a voice heard around the world

Reply

No

17 Comments
Pat Nelson Wilson
2
Pat Nelson Wilson

He doesn’t deserve it. He is a nobody and spewed hateful rhetoric.

Reply
Janice Adair
2
Janice Adair

He was a racist, white supremacist, and very divisive figure. The political violence that ended his lift is a terrible thing but it’s something he helped foment. This is the most ridiculous idea I can imagine.

Reply
Lisa Alexander
2
Lisa Alexander

He was a racist person who spread hate.

Reply
Jim Terry
1
Jim Terry

Need I really explain

Reply
Jane CommunityMember
1
Jane CommunityMember

I never heard of this guy before he was murdered, but it looks like he had a track record of saying awful things, and fomented the conditions in society that led to his demise. That's very tragic, but there are other people more deserving of a day.

Reply
Robert Spaet
0
Robert Spaet

Irony: “It's worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year, so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights…” Charlie Kirk 2023

Reply
k san
0
k san

Absolutely NOT!! He was a racist extraordinaire and spread divisive speech and ideas.

Reply
Byron Barclay
0
Byron Barclay

Because his MO is actually deceptive & decisive!

Reply
Linda Spaet
0
Linda Spaet

Though this is a tragic incident and a terrible time of violence in our country, Mr. Kirk was not an elected official. We should honor his family and respect them in many ways and I certainly have sympathy for his family. But this does not warrant aday in Oregon devoted to his name or his politics.

Reply
Robert Spaet
0
Robert Spaet

A highly partisan figure in American politics should never be given a day of observance for any reason. It should be acknowledge that violence is not acceptable in any form for any reason, but it should not be honored and given Publicity because of it.

Reply
Alex GERRITY
0
Alex GERRITY

He was not a government figure, and while I don’t condone the violence that took his life, he called on his supporters to bail out others that committed violence against elected government officials.

Reply
Laurie Maholland
0
Laurie Maholland

Mr. Kirk was too controversial and not a hero.

Reply
celeste carico
0
celeste carico

This guy was homophobic, racist, and anti women’s rights. While I think his murder is wrong, he is not a hero. He encouraged hatred towards people he didn’t agree with their lifestyles in his “teachings”. I don’t think Jesus would support him…he preached love for everyone!

Reply
Gerald Wonnacott
0
Gerald Wonnacott

We didn't create a Melissa Hortmann day and she was a good person. Charlie Kirk's rhetoric was about racism, sexism, mysoginism, and divisiveness. He was not a good person and represented everything that was NOT Christian.

Reply
Shannon Gamble
0
Shannon Gamble

Sure! Let's give kudos to the shooter! NOT! What about the 5 officers who just got shot in Pennsylvania? Should we have a day for that too?? Absolutely NOT necessary.

Reply
Do you think the fair should negotiate for a 20 year long term contract?

Do you think the fair should negotiate for a 20 year long term contract?

Yes

0

No

0

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT