Do you support a traffic light at the Reed Market and Bond St roundabout?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
596 Votes

Do you support a traffic light at the Reed Market and Bond St roundabout?

YES

6

NO

9

YES

4 Comments
k san
0
k san

I'm not sure what the solution is, but traffic coming from Reed Market west of the intersection is severely backed up to the previous roundabout at the Healy bridge. Backups are way worse there at 2 times/day than from the other 3 directions. Maybe a light would alleviate that congestion.

Reply
k san
0
k san

I'm not sure what the solution is, but traffic coming from Reed Market west of the intersection is severely backed up to the previous roundabout at the Healy bridge. Backups are way worse there at 2 times/day than from the other 3 directions. Maybe a light would alleviate that congestion.

Reply
Kit Cohan
0
Kit Cohan

I prefer metering to increasing the number of lanes. More than one lane makes roundabouts much more dangerous to navigate, especially with drivers who are not locals and do not understand how roundabouts work. 2 lanes = many more accidents plus 2 lanes need to be a much larger diameter for safety.

Reply
Jeff Sanders
0
Jeff Sanders

You're literally bumper to bumper from the Bill Healy bridge. The people from the Old Mill Never Cease coming.

Reply

NO

9 Comments
Dave Krajczynski
2
Dave Krajczynski

If people used the roundabout correctly and actually filled in the gaps and went when there was an opening it would flow just fine. People wait for a bus sized gap before they go.

Reply
Jeff Sanders
Jeff Sanders

The people coming from the Old Mill Never Cease coming. Traffic is backed up to Bill Healy bridge everyday. At least in the winter.

Latterdaysaint
1
Latterdaysaint

The point of the roundabouts was to get rid of lights

Reply
Dennis Douglas
1
Dennis Douglas

If it weren’t so maddening, our City counselors would make for a cast in a Monty Python show. They befuddle themselves with ludicrous ideas and foist them onto the taxpayers. Bend is becoming a laughing stock to outsiders and a source of continual angst for the residents.

Reply
SUE ABERNATHY
1
SUE ABERNATHY

Isn't that why they put the round about in because stop lights were going to cost to much????? Just saying.

Reply
sara kreps
1
sara kreps

doesn't this defeat the purpose of a roundabout? might as well make it a regular intersection with lights.

Reply
Kathy Brown
0
Kathy Brown

Make a LARGER round-about!! A stop light will only make it worse!!

Reply
Chris Gonzales
0
Chris Gonzales

A roundabout's primary purpose in traffic management is to improve safety and traffic flow, resulting in less congestion and fewer accidents compared to traditional stoplight intersections. Key words: Flow, less congestion and Stoplights. Now they want to add Stoplights!!! City waste at its Best!

Reply
Fletcher Jackson
0
Fletcher Jackson

What's the point of having a light at a roundabout? The point of a roundabout is to get rid of the lights. Widen it and start growing for the people coming here. The way bend builds, everything is obsolete by the time it's done.

Reply
Tim Walker
0
Tim Walker

I drive through this around about several times everyday and it is never an issue very rarely. Is it an issue? The reason they put roundabouts in for the first place was to get rid of stop lights and stop signs

Reply
Jeff Sanders
Jeff Sanders

It's bumper to bumper from the Bill Healy bridge.

Do you support red light cameras?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
570 Votes

Do you support red light cameras?

Yes

1

No

9

Yes

1 Comment
Loy Helmly
0
Loy Helmly

Increased traffic in Bend has brought more traffic woes. I have personally seen drivers increase speed or run red lights to get through intersections at the last minute. These cameras are needed safety features

Reply

No

9 Comments
John Bryant
0
John Bryant

This will lead to a surveillance state which I am opposed to.

Reply
Peter O'Neill
0
Peter O'Neill

They don’t take into account circumstances that happen all the time. This is why cops don’t always give you a ticket when they see you do it. I do not believe taking the human element out of law enforcement is effective. I do not believe these cameras should be legal.

Reply
Kodiak Malmstrom
0
Kodiak Malmstrom

More Government control. Give us statistics where it saved lives. Charging it's already extremely highly taxed citizens is ridiculous. It issues the owner of the car the citation who may not even be driving. Insurance goes up or is canceled causing low income drivers to drive without insurance.

Reply
Jordan Opdycke
0
Jordan Opdycke

At reed mkt and 3rd its already common to take 3 cycles of light changes to make it through. This will make it so people feel have to go slower contributing to the delay that already exists because of poorly planned infrastructure

Reply
Mt Man
0
Mt Man

All it is going to do overall, is produce more revenue and cause insurance rates of individuals to go up. It takes the real time needed judgment out of the equation by an officer. Clearly, infractions happen over small nuances or when in the dilemma zone. Put a big sign up would have the same effect

Reply
J F
0
J F

These aren't about safety. They are about revenue. And the fact that these 'tickets' are signed off by an 'officer' in another state and don't go on your driving record are proof.

Reply
Melissa Hunter
0
Melissa Hunter

Relying on technology to do the job of officers is not efficient reason for 2.3 million dollar project ,especially. When we just put more officers on the ground the last year.What was the need for more officers?.

Reply
Thomas Barrier iv
0
Thomas Barrier iv

Because it boost the pockets of the city, and takes from the people. It will not reduce car accidents that much, it's only for revenue for the politicians. And it's been proven that they don't work that great. This is just another Ponzi scheme to collect money from the public to line there pockets.

Reply
Judy Corwin
0
Judy Corwin

Try a rotary Peace Poll

Reply
Should the Oregon legislature create Charlie Kirk day?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
496 Votes

Should the Oregon legislature create Charlie Kirk day?

Yes

1

No

17

Yes

1 Comment
LuLyn Howard
0
LuLyn Howard

Charlie Kirk was a man of faith and gave his very life for the values I stand for. He was a voice heard around the world

Reply

No

17 Comments
Pat Nelson Wilson
2
Pat Nelson Wilson

He doesn’t deserve it. He is a nobody and spewed hateful rhetoric.

Reply
Janice Adair
2
Janice Adair

He was a racist, white supremacist, and very divisive figure. The political violence that ended his lift is a terrible thing but it’s something he helped foment. This is the most ridiculous idea I can imagine.

Reply
Lisa Alexander
2
Lisa Alexander

He was a racist person who spread hate.

Reply
Jim Terry
1
Jim Terry

Need I really explain

Reply
Jane CommunityMember
1
Jane CommunityMember

I never heard of this guy before he was murdered, but it looks like he had a track record of saying awful things, and fomented the conditions in society that led to his demise. That's very tragic, but there are other people more deserving of a day.

Reply
Robert Spaet
0
Robert Spaet

Irony: “It's worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year, so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights…” Charlie Kirk 2023

Reply
k san
0
k san

Absolutely NOT!! He was a racist extraordinaire and spread divisive speech and ideas.

Reply
Byron Barclay
0
Byron Barclay

Because his MO is actually deceptive & decisive!

Reply
Linda Spaet
0
Linda Spaet

Though this is a tragic incident and a terrible time of violence in our country, Mr. Kirk was not an elected official. We should honor his family and respect them in many ways and I certainly have sympathy for his family. But this does not warrant aday in Oregon devoted to his name or his politics.

Reply
Robert Spaet
0
Robert Spaet

A highly partisan figure in American politics should never be given a day of observance for any reason. It should be acknowledge that violence is not acceptable in any form for any reason, but it should not be honored and given Publicity because of it.

Reply
Alex GERRITY
0
Alex GERRITY

He was not a government figure, and while I don’t condone the violence that took his life, he called on his supporters to bail out others that committed violence against elected government officials.

Reply
Laurie Maholland
0
Laurie Maholland

Mr. Kirk was too controversial and not a hero.

Reply
celeste carico
0
celeste carico

This guy was homophobic, racist, and anti women’s rights. While I think his murder is wrong, he is not a hero. He encouraged hatred towards people he didn’t agree with their lifestyles in his “teachings”. I don’t think Jesus would support him…he preached love for everyone!

Reply
Gerald Wonnacott
0
Gerald Wonnacott

We didn't create a Melissa Hortmann day and she was a good person. Charlie Kirk's rhetoric was about racism, sexism, mysoginism, and divisiveness. He was not a good person and represented everything that was NOT Christian.

Reply
Shannon Gamble
0
Shannon Gamble

Sure! Let's give kudos to the shooter! NOT! What about the 5 officers who just got shot in Pennsylvania? Should we have a day for that too?? Absolutely NOT necessary.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT