Husker SquareOffs

33%
Offense

3

67%
Defense WINNER

5

33%
Offense

3 Comments
Peter Rygol
2
Peter Rygol

Considering we don't have an identity for the offense, coupled with new coaches this has to be the biggest question mark going into 2015. QB questions, running backs, receivers and now likely TE's in the mix it will be interesting what gets rolled out on September 5th.

Reply
Gene Baker
0
Gene Baker

Who will be the next starting QB? This is the biggest question the Huskers have this season.

Reply
Matt Maxwell
0
Matt Maxwell

Defense will be simplified and will let the horses run. Offense is about timing, and comfort in a system.

Reply

67%
Defense

5 Comments
Nathan Turner
9
Nathan Turner

Seems that Riley and staff know more about offense than defense. Not sure what to make of the defense, but I felt that the Pelini ran defense required NFL caliber talent, and it was much too complicated. If it's simplified, I think our defense can be a strength. I just have more questions on this side of the ball scheme-wise. Offense I'm completely optimistic.

Reply
Tony Dahlgren
1
Tony Dahlgren

Too thin at linebackers and defensive end.

Reply
Stephen Johnson
0
Stephen Johnson

Because the D coordinator has a poor history of performance

Reply
Faye Cook
0
Faye Cook

Great defense wins game. More so than great offencse. The gret defense keeps th e other team out of th end zone.No scoring against your team.

Reply
Stacy A Rodenbaugh
0
Stacy A Rodenbaugh

You can have an average offense and still win a championship as long as you have a great defense! Defense wins championships!

Reply

27%
1st/2nd round

1

73%
3rd or later WINNER

3

27%
1st/2nd round

1 Comment
Tom Caniglia
1
Tom Caniglia

He is a top 5 RB in the power 5

Reply

73%
3rd or later

3 Comments
Jonathon Siminoe
2
Jonathon Siminoe

Running back is currently under valued in the NFL with a plug and play mentality from large and small university programs a like.

Reply
Denny Tranmer
0
Denny Tranmer

Running backs are not a hot commodity like they once was

Reply
Gene Baker
0
Gene Baker

No later than the 3rd round! I'd like to see him go to the Denver Broncos. He would fit great in Gary Kubiak's running schemes.

Reply

68%
Yes WINNER

22

32%
No

6

68%
Yes

21 Comments
Jay Johnsen
9
Jay Johnsen

I hate to say it, because FCS schools make some good coin from playing FBS schools which boosts their universities, but I'd rather cut out those games, shorten the out of conference schedules, and have an eight team playoff. Teams such as Mich St, Baylor, TCU, and a Pac 12 or SEC school would've made an extremely intriguing playoff scenario. It's my personal suggestion, but it certainly doesn't make it right by any means.

Reply
Bart Burroughs
3
Bart Burroughs

I think 8 teams would be just about right. more than that and the season is too long. 8 adds a maximum of 3 extra games and would be more comprehensive. #9 will complain but no system is perfect anyway.

Reply
Stephen Johnson
1
Stephen Johnson

Let's expand it to 121 teams and call it the regular season. Then set up bowl games like they did in 1990.

Reply
Dan Lofquist
1
Dan Lofquist

I think it should be 6 teams. The teams that are ranked 1 and 2 should get a first round bye 3 plays 6 4 plays 5. The lower winning team plays 1 just like the NFL.

Reply
Nathan Turner
1
Nathan Turner

The arguments against include those whining outside the top 8 will be the same as those whining about being outside the top 4: that's false...nobody in #9 and above will cry for a long long time. Second argument is playing another game dampens the student-athlete mantra and the crowd support at different games, making the bowls completely useless...false, this is has been a great bowl season and much excitement...and come on, using the student athlete as an excuse? they'll be fine.

Reply
Gearld Wolff
1
Gearld Wolff

Six teams- Power 5 champion and highest ranked non-Power 5 CHAMPION. #1 and #2 get byes. #3 plays #6, #4 plays #5 the week before Christmas. Winners play #1 and #2 New Years Day. Winners play as currently set. Forces Big 12 to title game.

Reply
Rizeabuv Yorzelf
1
Rizeabuv Yorzelf

8 teams should do the trick. I think the Baylor's & TCUs of the world had a legitimate shot.

Reply
Gene Baker
1
Gene Baker

Eight team play

Reply
Eric Farris
0
Eric Farris

no more excuses with 8.

Reply
Kevin Sasse
0
Kevin Sasse

4 is nice, 6 is better, and 8 is the sweet spot. Collapse FBS down to 8 conferences that designate 1 champion who represents the conference. No polls, no computers, just Ws and Ls!

Reply
Todd Meedel
0
Todd Meedel

Because it is fair, plus based on the football playoffs this year awesome football, and champs will be decided on the field, not in a meeting room.

Reply
Keith Petrie
0
Keith Petrie

TCU... Nuff Said!

Reply
Brad Bredenkamp
0
Brad Bredenkamp

Should go to 6 or 8, but not until the Big XII gets a conf championship game to get on the same footing as the other 4 power conferences.

Reply
Sean Fluharty
0
Sean Fluharty

I think 8 teams would be the perfect number.

Reply
Michael Mahoney
0
Michael Mahoney

Less controversy with eight team field.

Reply
Landy Schwiesow
0
Landy Schwiesow

16 teams. Whoever has the moxie to pull off 4 games deserves to be the champion.

Reply
Dan Cubrich
0
Dan Cubrich

A couple more teams added to the playoff would make college football more exciting.

Reply
Shane Clayton
0
Shane Clayton

Should be top 8. If ever other division in college football can have a real playoff system, why not Division 1?

Reply
Tony Gage
0
Tony Gage

Because it's the only fair way to run a National Title Tournament. 5 auto bids from power conferences and 3 at large picks.

Reply
Christian Bengel
0
Christian Bengel

It will boost competition levels and would further legitimize the eventual champion. Everyone knew Florida State would fold under stiff competition, but by virtue of their record, they made the cut. What if Oregon had played a more consistent team? I guess an argument could be made either way. A championship team performs under pressure regardless of opponent and record.

Reply

32%
No

6 Comments
Andrew Grimes
5
Andrew Grimes

Too many games. Since all games count towards records, most achievements by good players will be overshadowed by those who played more games. For example: OJ Simpson rushed for 2003 yards in 14 games, but Eric Dickerson rushed for 2,105 yards in 16 games and is considered the all-time single season record holder.

Reply
Matthew J. Meyer
2
Matthew J. Meyer

If you're not 4the you can't possibly argue you're first. More teams tells you who's the best playoff team, not the best Team.

Reply
John Nielsen
2
John Nielsen

These young men are amateurs. Most of them will never sign a professional contract. A playoff exposes them to too much risk and it makes the regular season meaningless.

Reply
 Jim Jones
1
Jim Jones

while I was wavering, for me it came down to the "too many games already"...four seems right and has just the right amount of hype!

Reply
Patrick Pickett
1
Patrick Pickett

I never want to see a 2-loss team play for a National Championship!

Reply
HardcoreHusker
1
HardcoreHusker

last 2 teams will have to play 16 games, too much chance of injury, finals, getting healthy for seniors going to combines

Reply
Nathan Turner
Nathan Turner

Not if they all give up playing the FCS schools.

About Husker

Debates and polls on Husker from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT