Cars SquareOffs

Nope

0

Definitely

0

Nope

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

Definitely

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

Yes

6

No

17

Yes

6 Comments
Mark Mueller
0
Mark Mueller

I would support a tax per mile for electric vehicles only. There is already enough tax burden on the gas/diesel owner. Why shouldn't electric vehicle owners have pay, they share the same road.

Reply
Ed Holloran
0
Ed Holloran

All users of the road should pay. Not sure how out of state users would pay, like truckers. Paid monthly might work vs end of year payment.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
Latterdaysaint

Increasing taxes will hurt people

dceiplis
0
dceiplis

Because I drive less than 5000 miles a year I believe it would save me money in the end.

Reply
dceiplis
0
dceiplis

Because I drive less than 5000 miles a year. It would hopefully save me some money in the end.

Reply
Michael Bruner
0
Michael Bruner

Only if they totally get rid of the gas tax.

Reply
Michael Scott
0
Michael Scott

It's more fair to all.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
Latterdaysaint

No it not!

No

15 Comments
Teresa Rodriguez
1
Teresa Rodriguez

How are they going to track out of state EVs traveling Oregon highways? This will eventually trickle down to gas vehicles also, but the tax at the pump wont go away. The need is to figure out a way to tax at the charging stations, just like the pumps. Common sense.

Reply
B B
1
B B

We have the state taxing us too much already. Why add another?

Reply
Tracy Evans
1
Tracy Evans

Would I be taxed for gas and miles driven? We don't have hybrid vehicles.

Reply
Jon Krutsch
1
Jon Krutsch

Can't see how this would work. Mile tax replacing gas tax would work if OR was an island. But now I would pay a mile tax plus a gas tax when I travel out of state and out of state people would pay no tax while in OR. No Thanks.

Reply
Melissa Butler
1
Melissa Butler

First of all. You didn't mention the lottery money. Or, how about the "Pot" money. Where is that cash? sitting in a vault? Those funds where supposed to go to roads and schools.We already have some of the highest taxes in our country. We don't need more. This plan will hurt all of us. NO! NO! NO!

Reply
Kevin Nik Myles Hayward
1
Kevin Nik Myles Hayward

Maybe this would work for the EV so they can pay their fair share. and a per mile tole for out of staters.

Reply
Deb Kizer Dyck
1
Deb Kizer Dyck

What needs to happen is a way to tax electric chargers for EVs. People will either detach a "mile counter, or figure out a way to alter it. It needs to come at the "pump" so to speak....whether gas or electricity.

Reply
Mary Nichols
1
Mary Nichols

Ridiculous! We pay exorbitant taxes in the state. Where are our tax dollars going if we can’t even afford to maintain roads?

Reply
Mark Mueller
0
Mark Mueller

I would however support a "per mile" tax if it only applied to electric vehicles. Gas/diesel already pay enough at the pump. After all, it's supposedly for the repair for wear and tear of the roadway we all share.

Reply
Gin Freeman
0
Gin Freeman

I drive out of state a lot and don't want to be taxed twice. It would also disincentivise people from buying hybrids and EVs. The gas savings is part of the calculation and changing the rules is a little baity switchy.

Reply
Kimmy Wasatch
0
Kimmy Wasatch

No, enough already with the left, liberal policies. Seems this is meant to drive people to EV,s for the farce of climate change.

Reply
Erica Crossan
0
Erica Crossan

Because I live on the east side of the mountains and we have to drive a long distance to get to the doctor, grocery shopping, ect. So therefore we will get screwed again and end up paying way more than people on the west side of the mountains. What about people that drive for a living?

Reply
Lisa York
0
Lisa York

absolutely ridiculous proposal...NO MORE TAXES!

Reply
AL Roxburgh
0
AL Roxburgh

It would be a tax on those who could least afford it. It's a luxury to afford to live in the city, close to services. Those who can't afford that luxury have much longer commutes to work and shop, therefore would be taxed more. Not acceptable.

Reply

Yes

7

No

8

Yes

5 Comments
Mark Davis
2
Mark Davis

I drive to MT-B everyday. I'm using studs for everyone's safety. The law needs to reflect regional conditions.

Reply
Phil Spreier
0
Phil Spreier

If you have a two wheel drive in Bend, studded tires are essential. City plowing policies seem to generate more ice than a Zamboni…

Reply
Duane Wyman
0
Duane Wyman

Because I live in the Sunriver/LA Pine area; weather can be extreme in the winter. Also many new CO residents are not experienced in winter driving conditions. Safety, safety, safety for all!

Reply
Les Adams
Les Adams

But your comments assume studs give better traction than studless snow tires, which isn't true in most conditions.

M Vigoren
0
M Vigoren

This side of the mountain shouldn’t be told by idiots on the other side of the mountain. I use them until the very last day. Driving from LaPine to Bend is scary enough but on icy roads I want to know I have additional traction measures besides cinder rocks.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

I think they should be banned they are bad for the rd

Reply
M Vigoren
M Vigoren

Sorry idiot drivers are also bad for the roads but we can’t ban them.

No

6 Comments
damon
2
damon

winter tire performance has improved greatly on packed snow and mixed road crust. conditions where studs may be more useful (glassy sheets of ice) are rare, and they often underperform in many more common conditions. the noise, wear and tear, annual deadlines and poor performance, that’s a no for me

Reply
Latterdaysaint
Latterdaysaint

Simply put, studded tires can damage roads by causing friction. Subsequently, this creates ruts in the surface of the road, thus increasing the chance of water and ice build-up. Furthermore, studded tires can create a smoother surface, which can lead to slippery conditions when snow or rain begins

Off the path
0
Off the path

I use all seasons. I'll probably get studded next year as I'll have a new driver.

Reply
Dieter Heinzer
0
Dieter Heinzer

Studless Winter tires are quieter and provide better performance overall; additionally, I can put them on my car earlier and keep them on longer than the DOT deadlines.

Reply
Marcus Ainsworth
0
Marcus Ainsworth

why do you use studded tires?

Reply
Rick Allen
0
Rick Allen

NO, they should definitely be outlawed. They do millions worth of damage to roads and they area safety hazard. Studs create a perfect storm for ponding, creating hydroplaning due to the depressions in the roadway. They dont work that well, we have snow tires that soften in the cold and work great!

Reply
Les Adams
0
Les Adams

Many people still think studs give the best traction but lots of research has shown that studless traction tires are best in most conditions. Studs are only better in hard packed snow and give less traction than studless in many snow conditions.

Reply

About Cars

Debates and polls on Cars from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT