Transportation SquareOffs

Yes

1

No

5

Yes

1 Comment
Ed Neumann
1
Ed Neumann

Lowering speed limits might be an effective means of reducing injury and fatal traffic accidents but only if the limits are regularly enforced. One important way to "protect and serve" is zero to low tolerance enforcement every day.

Reply

No

5 Comments
Amanda
2
Amanda

People just need to pay attention and drive safer.

Reply
Dave Leverick
1
Dave Leverick

Lowering or raising speed limits doesn't prevent traffic accidents enforcement of the present speed limits and other traffic laws is what it takes

Reply
Jane CommunityMember
1
Jane CommunityMember

The Parkway is already at 45. Even the highest speed around here (65) is lower than in a lot of States.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
1
Latterdaysaint

There are already enough slow poke drivers in bend

Reply
Rick Allen
0
Rick Allen

The opinion provided on the news, by the county is not accurate!

Reply

Yes

4

No

1

Yes

4 Comments
Brian Klatt
0
Brian Klatt

Blow out my strut and alinement .. took a chunk out of tire

Reply
💛🖤 RAG 💛🖤
0
💛🖤 RAG 💛🖤

YES and the department should PRIORITIZE fixing them!

Reply
snowzone
0
snowzone

Take a drive down McKenzie Pass to Springfield.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

The city should fix all the potholes before doing anymore projects

Reply
CB
CB

You know that costs money, right, Gabe? And that money comes from taxes, which you constantly say you don't think we should pay. You can't have liberal wants with your outdated and archaic conservative views.

No

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

Yes

0

No

13

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

11 Comments
Rick Allen
1
Rick Allen

I try to avoid Bend as much as possible.

Reply
Tracy Evans
1
Tracy Evans

If you're going to spend that kind of money, then maybe you should use it for better use. The homeless could use more refurbished hotel/motels and or you could just build a facility. Trying to make our city pretty for the sake of wasting money makes me wonder what our city counselors are thinking.

Reply
Jon Krutsch
1
Jon Krutsch

If the Franklin and Greenwood underpasses were not close by, it wouldn't be a total waste. But they are so it is.

Reply
Ben Hargis
1
Ben Hargis

The homeless won't even use it.... they'll continue to just wander across the parkway at their own leisure.

Reply
Jeff Sanders
1
Jeff Sanders

Only for those in that direct vicinity. How many people really need to cross right there anyway?

Reply
Sam Ackerman
1
Sam Ackerman

I dont walk or ride a bike to go shopping or to work. 20 million is a lot of money to spend for another very short bike/walking trail.

Reply
d zimmerman
1
d zimmerman

I use Hawthorne exit from parkway. Construction will block it and its not clear if it will reopen after construction

Reply
Lorie Whitson
1
Lorie Whitson

It's a big waist of money.

Reply
snowzone
1
snowzone

Get real!! who's going to use it. That's $25,000,000 to get a handful of people across the parkway that could be put to better use.

Reply
snowzone
snowzone

for $25 million if 500 people cross it in a year that's 5000 in 10 years That's $5000 a crossing. Buy them a cab.

StevenandAnn Kyman
0
StevenandAnn Kyman

Don't see any benefit for anyone other than maybe those who can sell land to the city. I live in SE Bend. I am not going to drive over to the bridge, park, cross over the bridge, and walk several blocks to downtown.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

Big waste of money

Reply
Who to Follow
KTVZ

About Transportation

Debates and polls on Transportation from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT