Joe biden SquareOffs

Yes. This election needs more scrutiny.

10

No. Biden won fair and square.

27

Yes. This election needs more scrutiny.

Do you support Sen. Josh Hawley's plans to object to the counting of Electoral College votes?
10 Comments
clint brown
1
clint brown

Donald Trump won this election instead of Biden. We will fight this until we win. Enough of the liberals BS and time for them to suck it up with the fact that there will be 4 years of trump.

Reply
Charles Dawson
1
Charles Dawson

Too many irregularities are being ignored by both the courts and the media.

Reply
Neil Sharpton
1
Neil Sharpton

Because Democrats are corrupt as hell

Reply
Lori Rosburg
1
Lori Rosburg

Mail in voting made it way too easy to create voter fraud. Regardless of the election results, Josh Hawley has the right to make his objection. He should exercise that right.

Reply
Michael Lyman
1
Michael Lyman

The democrats continually ignore the evidence that the elections were manipulated in Penn, AZ and other states. This evidence is also conveniently ignored by numerous media outlets and characterized as "baseless." This is clearly untrue. It should be properly investigated.

Reply
Sharon DeWitt
Sharon DeWitt

It's been thrown out of courts; even REPUBLICAN elected officials declare the election was fair (including many WH staff); this is just showboating on Hawley's part, attempting to keep his name out there as he wants to make a run for the presidency in 2024.

Sharon Lage
1
Sharon Lage

HECK YES AND ROY BLUNT SHOULD DO THE SAME!!!

Reply
Mitzi Crump
1
Mitzi Crump

If mainstream media would look. There is widespread voter fraud. Several states! Look at other media outlets. Not abc,cbs,nbc,cnn,msnbc!

Reply
Sharon DeWitt
Sharon DeWitt

And what are you calling 'mainstream media'? The courts threw out the phony 'evidence' and there was bipartisan agreement within the states that all elections were fair!

Patricia Boggs
0
Patricia Boggs

Sob's stole the election from Trump. They lie, cheat and steal (dems)

Reply
HelenHighwater
0
HelenHighwater

Because, due to the volatility of the situation, it's better for everyone to have their final say in the matter. Then, once the election results are verified, the country can move forward and turn our attention to other pressing matters.

Reply
Shirla Day
0
Shirla Day

Because he's the only man up on that hill that's for the American people he has common sence .....we the people are sick and tired of all the corruption in that white house we need to clean house get people in there that have common sense about what really goes on out here in the real world....

Reply
Sharon DeWitt
Sharon DeWitt

We're ALL sick & tired of the WH corruption, but be happy - change is coming in about 21 days!!!

No. Biden won fair and square.

Do you support Sen. Josh Hawley's plans to object to the counting of Electoral College votes?
24 Comments
Terry Martin
2
Terry Martin

Hawley is behaving like Trump: only interested in his own power, money and fame. He is a threat to our democracy.

Reply
Lynnette Johnson
2
Lynnette Johnson

anyone that supports Trump doesn't have the intelligence of a flea.Grandstanding for sure ahead of a run himself for a V.P candidate while wasting taxpaers money!!!!!!!

Reply
Jeffery Schuyler
2
Jeffery Schuyler

Despite 60 separate Courtroom attempts, no actual evidence has been submitted. This is another desperate action, this time by Hawley. I'm embarrassed by his shallow attempt.

Reply
Alisa Dotson
1
Alisa Dotson

Because Biden won- he got more votes. Trump and his supporters need to move past the loss just like I did in 2016.

Reply
Cathy Kroner
1
Cathy Kroner

Josh Hawley is an embarrassment to the state of Missouri. I would love to know what Trump has on him. Two top Trump officials have said that there was not voter fraud on a level that would affect the outcome of the election. No one has presented a shred of evidence to the contrary.

Reply
Shannon Wortham
1
Shannon Wortham

Multiple court cases have proven nothing. Even the FBI couldn't find evidence of voter fraud. Why, why do this? If you have evidence, show it. If you do not, shut up.

Reply
Sarah Perry
1
Sarah Perry

I think Hawley is being a sore loser and looking for attention. If he has future aspirations, there are better ways to get his name out.

Reply
Beverly Brown
1
Beverly Brown

Harley is as embarrassing as Trump. The more that a peaceful transition is denied, the more dangerous it is for the security of our country.

Reply
Sabrina Tannehill
1
Sabrina Tannehill

More than 50 courts have found no evidence of voter fraud. It's time to move on and get over it. We can't try to overturn an election every time we don't agree with the outcome. Every side will do this for every election if this is allowed. Let's not set this precedent.

Reply
Sharon DeWitt
1
Sharon DeWitt

Truth - fair elections as the court threw out Rudy's claims otherwise. Hawley is just trying to make a name for himself & we all see through it. He also doesn't actually reside in MO & can't be OUT of politics soon enough to suit this voter!

Reply
Carolyn Overbey Watson
1
Carolyn Overbey Watson

Because the election process has been validated over and over again in many different trials. Nothing went awry and we should accept the results and move on. Trump should accept the results and get ready to move out.

Reply
Susan Ellen Kerrigan
1
Susan Ellen Kerrigan

Hawley is only out for himself. He has aspirations to run for president and wants to get in good with Trump's base but isn't doing anything for his constituents. He didn't get my vote in the past and won't again in the future for anything he runs for.

Reply
Jessica Wolfe
1
Jessica Wolfe

Hawley is using this for publicity and power. Sadly, he is undermining the will of the people and our election process. It’s a disgrace and I ashamed he is from Missouri. He is not helping the republican prtt but hurting the entire country. Shame, shame, shame on you, Hawley. Stop this nonsense!

Reply
Harold Kerr II
1
Harold Kerr II

I will NEVER vote for this sore loser again--Hawley that is

Reply
Ron Lafave
1
Ron Lafave

The margin is so wide that opposing the election results in one or two states makes no sense. A waste of money. The states have a right to decide how to conduct their elections as it pointed out in the Constitution. All the lawsuits have failed because they produce no proof.

Reply
Dennis Gravedoni Sr.
1
Dennis Gravedoni Sr.

He is grandstanding to gain trump supporters in a potential presidential bid for himself. He is doing nothing for Missourians.

Reply
Jim Scott
1
Jim Scott

Hawley is a piece of shit. He cares not for democracy, and the real needs of Americans or Missourians, but only for his own future as another corrupt, bribe-taking politician. He is making a mockery of Democracy, and should join the long list of republicans who should be removed from office.

Reply
Anita Grace Ward
0
Anita Grace Ward

This man is not a patriot! He ecouraged a coup to our democracy! He needs ssd to be unseated!

Reply
Wilbur Jones
0
Wilbur Jones

The government can't handle distributing a lifesaving vaccine; you think they could handle a cover up of that magnitude? Biden won, get over it.

Reply
Nancy Jo Ames
0
Nancy Jo Ames

There has been no evidence to the contrary. Trump clearly won Missouri, Josh should mind his own ads that called for voting early by mail here at home. I am Democrat

Reply
Michelle Elliot Winchester
0
Michelle Elliot Winchester

Hawley & his cronies are undermining democracy &tearing our country apart. Hawley says the votes for the misfire in the White House should count. They do. As do the votes for Biden, which there were more of. Hawley is brazenly playing for the future votes of the MAGA crew. Shameful. UnAmerican.

Reply
Rachel Leip
0
Rachel Leip

Biden won fair and square. Trump's claims are baseless and anti-democratic. Hawley's action is self-promoting and also anti-democratic. All "fraud" charges have been litigated and found to be utterly without merit. This is shameful!

Reply
Steve Struemph
0
Steve Struemph

It's a waste of time.

Reply
Jim Sims
0
Jim Sims

Hawley is only looking to be VP candidate if dump runs in 2024, now that McConnell has gotten on dumps bad side, Hawley sees an opportunity to crawl under the presidents desk where Graham and McConnell was, learn to swallow Hawley

Reply

Yes, I agree.

5

No, I disagree.

38

Yes, I agree.

5 Comments
Calvin Hamman
0
Calvin Hamman

because if a 16 year old can enroll into the army, they should at least be able to vote.

Reply
Don Elsom
0
Don Elsom

lots of issues being debated today affect 16 YO for years to come. Most are more informed than people my age.

Reply
Darlene Knox
0
Darlene Knox

Only if we bring back civics classes so they understand what they are voting for.

Reply
Mark Clement
0
Mark Clement

kids today are a lot smarter than we were at 16. give 'em a chance to prove themselves.

Reply

No, I disagree.

37 Comments
Joseph Proulx
1
Joseph Proulx

Absolutely not! The voting age should be moved back to 21

Reply
John Driscoll
1
John Driscoll

There is a strong case for restoring the voting age to 21 with an exception for individuals serving with the military or who have been honorably discharge

Reply
Amy Schrader
1
Amy Schrader

Liberals have socialist agenda indoctrinating our kids in the school system. They still live under parents roof, wet behind the ears, NO, NO, NO way they should be allowed to vote yet.

Reply
Kenneth Swipies
1
Kenneth Swipies

The age for most activities should be raised, not lowered. Children are still children.

Reply
Sadie Kittelson
1
Sadie Kittelson

18 was stupid and this insane.!!!!!!

Reply
Lynn Huntley
1
Lynn Huntley

They shouldn't even be allowed to drive. They are NOT mature enough.

Reply
Gramma Jean
0
Gramma Jean

NO! Children are not taught civics and are too immature. Two basic reasons. It was an idea brought out by politics, not common sense.

Reply
Kim Varner
0
Kim Varner

I have a 16 year old. He’s not competent enough to remember to brush his hair and teeth, put deodorant on, put clean clothes on after you shower. No thanks. Leave it to someone who is older.

Reply
Leslie Ann
0
Leslie Ann

Excuse me but... HELL NO... they are NOT all mature enough.

Reply
Kiefer Davis
0
Kiefer Davis

ARE YOU PEOPLE OUT OF YOUR MINDS?

Reply
Kathryn Kinney Evans
0
Kathryn Kinney Evans

Some 16 year olds are mature enough to vote but I would say 90% are not. Voting is an important act and has to be considered carefully.

Reply
Robyn Ryel
0
Robyn Ryel

At 16 you are to influenced by your peers. At that age you are more concerned with what you will wear out Friday night.

Reply
Dilly Powell-Smith
0
Dilly Powell-Smith

Because 16 year olds are not mature enough to be making those kind of decisions.

Reply
Teresa Rodriguez
0
Teresa Rodriguez

Oregon leaders, in their infinite wisdom just moved the smoking age to 21, now want 21 to buy firearms, can't sign a contract til 18, nor live on their own. Now they want more voters, soooooo

Reply
Bradaigh Holt
0
Bradaigh Holt

Absolutely not. It has been scientifically proven that brains (reasoning centers) are not fully developed until age 25.

Reply
Bruce Sharp
0
Bruce Sharp

16 is much too young. Wait until they are out of the house and earning their own living. Love their energy and idealism, but needs to be tempered with experience and pragmatism.

Reply
F Hoskins
0
F Hoskins

They are not emotionally mature enough for serious choices, can be too reactionary

Reply
Anna Howe
0
Anna Howe

They don't know what life is about at 16. Still looking for boy/girl friends.

Reply
Chrissie Wise
0
Chrissie Wise

too young to many immature hormones

Reply
Breeauna Sagdal
0
Breeauna Sagdal

Tide pods, condom snorting and common core... I rest my case! Salem doesn't trust people to own a gun until 21, but voting on future policy is fine? Have you met today's teens?

Reply
Gladys Graybael
0
Gladys Graybael

They not mature or ready to vote, they still out here doing dumbass challenges like sniffing condoms, go missing for 2 days and eating tide pods.

Reply
Fred Farkle
0
Fred Farkle

You know, 15 is almost 16, why not them? Drivers license? 15 year olds can get a permit after taking the same test. While were at it, lower the drinking and marijuana ages to 15 also.

Reply
Kevin Crabtree
0
Kevin Crabtree

Yeah because we all new everything at 16 at least we thought we did. Heck I think its should be raised to 25 that's when you finally figure out you don't know everything

Reply
sharder8
0
sharder8

Tide pods, condom snorting, ice challenge . . . Need I say more?

Reply
Greg and Karen Cross
0
Greg and Karen Cross

At 16 children are vulnerable to peer pressure as well as to people in authority persuading their decisions.

Reply
Kathy Todhunter
0
Kathy Todhunter

Kids at the age of 16 most likely still live at home with parents, they are not of legal age to make decisions and have not worked full time, paid taxes nor have they paid bills for their own support.

Reply
Bob Harlan
0
Bob Harlan

nope they shouldn't be given the right to vote, Legally they aren't responsible for their own lives yet, so why should they be given the privilege of controlling the lives of others.

Reply
Bob Vidourek
0
Bob Vidourek

The canals with water improve on scenic value. Piping would degrade this value.

Reply
Georgeanna Condon
0
Georgeanna Condon

16 year old minds are still developing and changing. No they are barely old enough to know who they are. If you allow them to vote, might as well let them drink, go to war and handle all other adult r

Reply
Fred Farkle
Fred Farkle

agreed. Wait, they're just kids, you can't expect them to drink and fight. They don't understand the consequences, EXACTLY!

Ka San
0
Ka San

Just like smoking and drinking age is 18, as should be the voting age. 16 yr olds are still too much under their parents' authority and would probably just vote however their parents tell them.

Reply
Ken Callison
0
Ken Callison

Before you have the privilege of voting, you should have some skin in the game. Like paying taxes. Being old enough to service in the armed forces, be old enough to be accountable for your actions.

Reply
Dave Voiles
0
Dave Voiles

For heaven's sake! It's all part of the same lefty agenda, just like immigration. Knowing that young people tend to lean liberal it means more Dem votes. They couldn't care less about the kids rights.

Reply
Michael Wagner
0
Michael Wagner

They're still eating tide pods and burning themselves with erasers and want everything for free are you kidding me it should be raised to 21

Reply
Leah Kenville
0
Leah Kenville

Children don't understand what is going on in politics at 16.

Reply
Wanda Hancock
0
Wanda Hancock

Just because they pay taxes, etc. does not mean they know how to vote.....they don't pay attention and have no interest.

Reply
Dave Cupp
0
Dave Cupp

there brains are not fully developed

Reply
Pam Ferguson
0
Pam Ferguson

Kids at that age are to vote what parents or other people tell them not using their own mind &/or beliefs. Barely do at 18!!!!!

Reply

Yes

3

No

1

Yes

1 Comments
Harry D
2
Harry D

The Democratic Party is pushing hateful rhetoric, like calling Trump supporters "fascist" and "nazi" to drive people to violence and cause a color revolution. This must stop.

Reply

No

1 Comment
Fred
0
Fred

Trump has called Democrats “scum,” “vermin,” “animals” and “enemies of the people.” When U.S. Rep. Pelosi’s 82-year-old husband was bludgeoned with a hammer by a deranged man, Trump joked about it.

Reply
Harry D
Harry D

'This Is A Both Sides Issue,' Says Side That Shot President Trump, Assassinated Charlie Kirk, Tried To Assassinate Kavanaugh, Tried To Shoot Trump Again, Shot Steve Scalise, Firebombed Governor Shapiro, Tried To Shoot Trump A Third Time..." Babylon Bee - but true.

Max
Max

They are acting like that, yes.

About Joe biden

Debates and polls on Joe biden from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT