KTVZ

KTVZ

www.ktvz.com
Central Oregon's News Leader
Would you support making daylight saving time permanent?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
921 Votes

Would you support making daylight saving time permanent?

Yes, of course!

17

No, keep it as it is

8

Yes, of course!

17 Comments
JohnWayne Kenneth Pool
1
JohnWayne Kenneth Pool

I'd rather have an extra hour of light in the evening than morning.

Reply
Annemarie Bots Crosier
1
Annemarie Bots Crosier

Longer evenings are more useful than early mornings. Also, it’s been scientifically proven that switching the clocks on your population increases work injury, vehicle accidents, and heart attaks

Reply
Leslie Ann
0
Leslie Ann

The reasons it was created is redundant now. Let's not change clocks anymore.

Reply
Kiefer Davis
0
Kiefer Davis

Suicide rates go up. S..A..D. Syndrome goes up. Depression goes up. Stop messing with mother nature !

Reply
Linda Nolin
0
Linda Nolin

I hate the time change it really makes me tired all the time. No one I know likes the time change so just leave it how it is now!

Reply
TresMap_USA
0
TresMap_USA

Yes, yes, yes. So dated. Majority of us are not farmers.

Reply
Reebo Rasafrasser
0
Reebo Rasafrasser

Poorly worded question. From the responses, many misunderstood the question. I can live with either DLS or Standard time, just pick one and leave it.

Reply
Vl SJ
0
Vl SJ

It really effect my helth my heart getting irregular bits and I’m getting sick. Get rid of it pleeeease

Reply
Susan Whiting
0
Susan Whiting

I would prefer it stay Standard time all year. The change affect my body chemistry for weeks after the change!

Reply
Betty McKittrick
0
Betty McKittrick

Health and safety are major concerns. Darkness about 5 pm in Dec. is dangerous. Additionally, the later hour in the morning of additional daylight is beneficial to commuting and mental outlook.

Reply
Nik Myles
0
Nik Myles

I would be for leaving DST permanent but I think it would be less of a hassle to go opt into standard time. It's written into law that we have that option. We don't need a useless act of congress

Reply
Ka San
0
Ka San

Absolutely make DST permanent!! More productive daylight hours. I note that folks are responding to this survey in the wrong columes. Pay attn to what you are voting for. Most comments make no sense.

Reply
Kenneth Swipies
0
Kenneth Swipies

Before DST became law it was rejected by the people three times. It was the legislature tat made it law. Time to do the will of the people.

Reply
Pam W
0
Pam W

We could just put our clocks back the one minute or whatever it is that changing the time helps with. I like longer days. It just doesn't make sense to change our time by an hour.

Reply
Cathy Jensen
0
Cathy Jensen

Because it is inconvenient and serves no necessary purpose

Reply

No, keep it as it is

7 Comments
Gramma Jean
0
Gramma Jean

Actually, the question is should we keep STANDARD TIME permanent... I think "natural earth time" is what we need to get back to.

Reply
Richard Dillard
0
Richard Dillard

I would rather do away with daylight savings time altogether.

Reply
Kathy Deloach
0
Kathy Deloach

Seriously ? They want to be the one spot on the globe that differs from the world?

Reply
Brandy Barr
0
Brandy Barr

I WILL STILL ALWAYS CHANGE MY CLOCKS AS I LOVE THE EXTRA DAYLIGHT HOURS OF SUMMER!!! LEAVE IT AS IT IS!!

Reply
Judy Ostrom-Dixon
0
Judy Ostrom-Dixon

Hard to answer, you should just ask do you prefer DST or Standard time, the questions make no sense. However my answer, we should stay on Standard Time year round and stop messin with crap!

Reply
Jean Bouche
0
Jean Bouche

We are no longer an agrarian society and don’t need extra daylight hours to harvest the fields. Let’s just go back permanently to standard time and leave our clocks alone. It is too much of a hassle.

Reply
Have you noticed less for sale signs in your neighborhood and around town?

Have you noticed less for sale signs in your neighborhood and around town?

Yes

0

No

0

Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

No

0 Comment
No one has commented yet
Do you believe the POTUS should have broad authority to impose tariffs on other countries?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
195 Votes

Do you believe the POTUS should have broad authority to impose tariffs on other countries?

Yes

2

No

4

Yes

2 Comments
William Schwabe
0
William Schwabe

Because the president wants to put America first and make it as prosperous as it once was. #MAGA

Reply
Steven Miles
0
Steven Miles

Exec branch has the responsibility to manage the economy with other countries, congress can’t even produce an annual budget - look at this democrat shutdown, they want to spend another 1.5T on healthcare subsidies- sorry, we are in the hole $35T, wake up America.

Reply

No

4 Comments
k san
0
k san

Congress has the power of the purse, if only they would use it. but they're too scared of being primaried by him. Of course, he should not have 1/3 of the powers he has adopted, whether constitutional or not. He's an abomination!!

Reply
Tom Pummer
0
Tom Pummer

Trump’s tariffs violate the constitution. Congress holds the nations purse strings. I can’t believe we hardly heard a peep from members of Congress on his actions. Spineless

Reply
Rick Martinson
0
Rick Martinson

Absolutely not. The Constitution gives that authority to Congress, NOT the executive branch of the government. Trump’s actions are absolutely illegal and unconstitutional. But he doesn’t care, and has been giving Congress and the American People the finger for the past 10 months.

Reply
Mike Moreno
0
Mike Moreno

Memo to trump...there is a document in this country called the Constitution. Read it, learn it, live it.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT