KTVZ

KTVZ

www.ktvz.com
Central Oregon's News Leader
Do you think the person who leaked the draft Roe v. Wade opinion should face criminal charges?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
998 Votes

Do you think the person who leaked the draft Roe v. Wade opinion should face criminal charges?

Yes, they should face criminal charges!

10

No, they shouldn't!

4

Yes, they should face criminal charges!

7 Comments
Greg Moore
1
Greg Moore

This is not about abortion... leaking SCOTUS draft decisions is a clear threat to unbiased deliberations of justices, regardless of ideology

Reply
Robert Northrup
1
Robert Northrup

Isn't it funny when Trump was in office the leaks were like a river. Truthful or not. But you couldn't squeeze a teaspoonful out of the Durham investigation. The only information is when there is a new indictment revealed. Start sending people to prison.

Reply
Larry Ewart
0
Larry Ewart

The justices are there to interpret the law not make it.

Reply
Jeff Bradfeldt
0
Jeff Bradfeldt

Yes, and they should be disbarred at the very least.

Reply
LESLIE Wayt
0
LESLIE Wayt

I messed up. I vote NO... not yes. Dang it.

Reply
Amanda Wallace
0
Amanda Wallace

Regardless of my opinion on the Supreme Court's decision, leaking ANY information should result in serious consequences.

Reply
Gabe West
0
Gabe West

It was probably released by a democrat to cause riots, btw life begins at conception

Reply
Gabe West
Gabe West

You know the question

No, they shouldn't!

3 Comments
Jon Krutsch
3
Jon Krutsch

If there was no actual law broken, then it isn't a crime.

Reply
Gabe West
Gabe West

It was probably leaked by a democrat to cause a riot, btw life begins at conception

Richard Martinson
1
Richard Martinson

Quit trying to deflect from the main story. The Supreme Court is playing politics and attempting to remove constitutional rights from American citizens. Leaking the memo is not the issue - the assault on democracy is!

Reply
Gabe West
Gabe West

Their is nothing in the constitution about abortion

Rick Lewis
1
Rick Lewis

Kgvz is nothing but a fox outlet ask you a question like this shows me that you're just nothing but a trump follower anyone that works for Fox is a pathetic excuse for a news person

Reply
Should a judge block the May first closure of China Hat road?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
876 Votes

Should a judge block the May first closure of China Hat road?

YES

2

NO

18

YES

2 Comments
Brad Hunter
0
Brad Hunter

Because they are steam rolling the homeless

Reply

NO

18 Comments
Kayla Sulak
1
Kayla Sulak

These people have had MONTHS of notice. Nobody ever told them it's acceptable to post up long-term there, so they shouldn't have planted their belongings out there if they have no way to move it. This sets a bad precedent if they're allowed to stay.

Reply
Richard Williams
1
Richard Williams

I can no longer use this area of public land for fear of walking into a homeless camp or being attacked by their "pets". This land is for all of us to use, not just the homeless.

Reply
Joanna Lee
1
Joanna Lee

Safety should be the biggest concern here. If these people are homeless, they can travel to another area to reside. Forest service doesn't always implement preventative measures. So this being one of the times they do. Its important to make sure it happens. Before there is anymore devastating fires.

Reply
Shane Murray
1
Shane Murray

The homeless have trashed the forest out there. It makes me sick

Reply
Greg Deadbolt Leach
1
Greg Deadbolt Leach

Time to move these people to the Attorneys and Judges front lawns!!!

Reply
Karen Thrower
1
Karen Thrower

The China Hat area has been badly damaged and disrespected by campers.

Reply
Jeannie H.
1
Jeannie H.

How is this their "home"? Have they paid property tax like the rest of us? How is this state even justifying this?!?!

Reply
Nancy
1
Nancy

They’ve had plenty of time to move. Why can the homeless trash/burn our beautiful forest? Tax paying citizens are only allowed to camp for 14 days! What about the homeowners rights near China Hat, they need to feel safe in their own community! This has gone on way too long and I’m surprised!

Reply
Lynn Marie Leehmann
1
Lynn Marie Leehmann

If you look at the Federal Regulations for camping on Federal land it states only 14 days. These people have over stated their welcome, they need to go and they have known about this for at least six months.

Reply
Brad Aimone
1
Brad Aimone

It is ironic the Bend Equity Group has filed a lawsuit to block the closure. Where is the indignation for the horrible environmental damage done by these campers who’ve violated the USFS long standing limit of a 14 day stay in a primitive camp site?

Reply
Nancy Roquero
1
Nancy Roquero

This has gone on too long. The forests near Woodside community and other neighborhoods need fire protection and protection from the homeless with guns and vicious dogs and the garbage left behind. The homeless have had plenty of notice.

Reply
Lisa York
1
Lisa York

the USFS has been planning this burn since Oct 2019... more than enough time for the homeless/advocacy groups to come up with a plan to move...

Reply
Debbie Boyd
1
Debbie Boyd

This has been going on for way too long & it is ridiculous to postpone as they have known this needs to be done. The forest needs to be protected & these do gooders are too late to the game & so much time & money spent on homeless with ZERO results. We need DOGE. for Oregon!

Reply
pamcuny
0
pamcuny

I worry every year WHO is in the woods starting fires, whether deliberate or unintentional consequences…

Reply
Tammy Salka
0
Tammy Salka

The homeless are not residents, they are squatters!

Reply
Jeff Sanders
0
Jeff Sanders

I live near China Hat and used to love going out the with my dog. Once weapons started be pulled on people that stopped. I want my forest back. Good riddance to the whole lot. Don't ever come back.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

There needs to be more homeless shelters in the city!

Reply
Kim Kahl
0
Kim Kahl

The danger of fire starting in this area is incredibly high and impacts large subdivisions. It is mandatory to close this area for the safety of all. This should not be a place for camping to be allowed as it has been.

Reply
Are you concerned about the findings of the DA's investigation into Sheriff Van Der Kamp?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
854 Votes

Are you concerned about the findings of the DA's investigation into Sheriff Van Der Kamp?

Yes

9

No

1

Yes

9 Comments
Timothy MacGillivray
1
Timothy MacGillivray

He should be FIRED immediately as he is the individual in charge of the entire department. He must set the standard of honesty and integrity for both staff and the Public. What type of leader is this? Why is this even being questioned? He faced charges in La Mesa, California as well!

Reply
steven
0
steven

I just heard the recording. He lied about lying. Gotta go.

Reply
David Kline
0
David Kline

Sad to see this happen.

Reply
Susan Kate Mayer
0
Susan Kate Mayer

Good job DA! Glad someone is doing their job

Reply
Michael Hickey
0
Michael Hickey

Why is he still in this position, come on Deschutes Co. This is pathetic.

Reply
Laura Wattenbarger
0
Laura Wattenbarger

How can he be trusted to be truthful in anything if he lied about even just this one thing? A man in his position shouldn't be lying about anything at all and the fact that he did makes him untrustworthy 100%.

Reply
Anne King
0
Anne King

If he can't be honest about such a basic thing as his education, he can't be trusted with Deschutes County's safety! What else has he lied about? He should resign!

Reply

No

1 Comment
Steven Huillet
0
Steven Huillet

Just more Liberal attacks on Conservative. This is what they do because they lost the elections. Poor losers!

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT