KTVZ

KTVZ

www.ktvz.com
Central Oregon's News Leader
Do you agree with Deschutes County's decision not to proceed with a managed camp?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
1,539 Votes

Do you agree with Deschutes County's decision not to proceed with a managed camp?

Yes

27

No

2

Yes

21 Comments
Matt
4
Matt

Moving a disaster nightmare from one location to another is pathetic! Oh poor Melanie was surprised by this last minute decision by the county. Well, now you know how we the community feel when you make decisions without any input from the citizens.You are a horrible mayor to dump this garbage on us

Reply
Maggie Mae
Maggie Mae

very well said!!

sandra zollman
4
sandra zollman

As a tax payer I don't want to pay for shelters for the unemployed but I simply don't trust the city council or the mayor concerning the camp.

Reply
Matt
Matt

Well said. The city could careless about our input but unfortunately we have Bend people still voting dems and this is the end result. Chris Piper was all about balance and listening to the community. Bend will never learn. Melanie never listened to us as counselor. Why would that be any different

Ken Holmes
4
Ken Holmes

This would be an Enabling idea for for people who choose to live the 'Homeless' lifestyle.

Reply
Native Oregonian
2
Native Oregonian

It's time for "tough love". We can't keep enabling the behavior we've seen on Hunnel Road and simply move it across town, "managed" or not. Google "Coronado CA Homeless" and see what they have done to almost eliminate homelessness. It can be done, but not the way Bend is trying to do it.

Reply
Duane Wyman
2
Duane Wyman

Keibler, the Les Schwab location was NOT a solution just a speedy bandaid applied to a stop bleeding. Bend needs more than just a bandaid...

Reply
Matt
Matt

Our city council members are a complete joke! Absolutely worthless and should be replaced with balance. They think they're god and were all just pheasants. You have destroyed Bend all because you simply couldn't just say 'NO' 3 years ago when the transients came here. Go speak with Lowe's!

Michael Porterfield
1
Michael Porterfield

We need homeless centers that do not impact local businesses. These centers should be sited away from business areas and those locations along major roadways.

Reply
Sue Abernathy
1
Sue Abernathy

Putting it there would have put many people in jeopardy and would have hurt many businesses.

Reply
Ltk Man
0
Ltk Man

How dare the County Commission listen to their constituents!! Well...all except Chang.

Reply
Marcus Ainsworth
0
Marcus Ainsworth

this is a bandaid, its massaging the symptoms, not addressing the cause, but more importantly the people don't want it. That's why the commissioners voted no. They listened to their consituents.

Reply
Steve Bernhardt
0
Steve Bernhardt

Because noone looked at putting the encampment on the West Side. That would be too close to home.

Reply
Kimmy Wasatch
0
Kimmy Wasatch

Finally someone stood up and said No.Until officials realize that just throwing money and providing free stuff actually promotes homelessness and stops the practice, the problem will not go away. I believe most are happy with the free stuff and freedom to do drugs or whatever they want .

Reply
Justin Day
0
Justin Day

The city failed to involve the community in three location that the homeless safe parking was supposed to move to. The mayor says that this issue involves the community but clearly doesn't value the community's opinion. This was a one-sided power move by a politician.

Reply
Mark Mueller
0
Mark Mueller

Glad to see more "reasonable heads" prevailed. Free camping on public property should not be allowed, it only promotes more of the same humanitarian disaster by individuals that live this lifestyle by choice.

Reply
Salli Mc
0
Salli Mc

Poor location as south entrance to Bend. Not enough answers to the homeless problem.

Reply
Wayne Holland
0
Wayne Holland

We need to look at the "root cause" of this problem locally and nationally. Our Governments have contributed to this problem and it needs to be corrected with a change in direction which starts with the Federal Government down to local communities.

Reply
Carolyn Wheeler
0
Carolyn Wheeler

The solution is not enabling them with services and help. Its a drug problem. Address that. They are not local people, they came here because Bend offers a place to stay and continue to use drugs whenever they want. City Council is NOT in the favor of the tax payers. They want to push the problem

Reply
Dave Leverick
0
Dave Leverick

It's about time If you did not become homeless while living in bend oregon then we cannot help Go back to your home state for help

Reply
Deb Kizer Dyck
0
Deb Kizer Dyck

The location was unacceptable on many levels.

Reply
Mike Larson
0
Mike Larson

Stop enabling them to stay homeless. Quit giving them everything, force them to change their lives.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

Build more homeless shelters instead

Reply

No

2 Comments
Kathy Hudson
1
Kathy Hudson

Because it was a solution and Adair and DeBone have no alternatives. We need solutions not obstacles to solving our houseless problem.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
Latterdaysaint

We need homeless shelters not camps

Kim Moller
1
Kim Moller

The County needs to step up and help alleviate the homeless/houseless problem. This was a good effort now shot down by two people on the County Commission. They offer no alternatives. Poor leadership from DeBone and Adair. Very disappointing.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
Latterdaysaint

Bend needs homeless shelters not camps

sandra zollman
sandra zollman

The city has a reputation for not involving or listening to the public. Numerous times the city council has left the public out of their decisions knowing that the public would not be in agreement with them. They have shown extreme arrogance towards taxpayers. Commissioners want more input by the pu

Should there be better vetting of candidates and reporting in the voters pamphlet?

Should there be better vetting of candidates and reporting in the voters pamphlet?

Yes

2

No

0

Yes

2 Comments
Lisa York
0
Lisa York

EVERYTHING submitted by the candidates for inclusion in the voter's pamphlet should be thoroughly vetted!!!

Reply
Marie Gilbert
0
Marie Gilbert

Because he is an elected official and should be 100% honest.

Reply

No

0 Comment
No one has commented yet
Should a judge block the May first closure of China Hat road?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
1,000 Votes

Should a judge block the May first closure of China Hat road?

YES

3

NO

21

YES

3 Comments
Louis Vaday
0
Louis Vaday

This made an error! I voted NO and it recorded yes! They shouldn't {and ALL} shouldn't be allowed on all public land because they do not follow rules! Dumping garbage, open flames during fire season, over extending time stay, etc. And now because of them our insurance is going up and land value goin

Reply
Brad Hunter
0
Brad Hunter

Because they are steam rolling the homeless

Reply

NO

21 Comments
Tammy Salka
1
Tammy Salka

The homeless are not residents, they are squatters!

Reply
Kayla Sulak
1
Kayla Sulak

These people have had MONTHS of notice. Nobody ever told them it's acceptable to post up long-term there, so they shouldn't have planted their belongings out there if they have no way to move it. This sets a bad precedent if they're allowed to stay.

Reply
Richard Williams
1
Richard Williams

I can no longer use this area of public land for fear of walking into a homeless camp or being attacked by their "pets". This land is for all of us to use, not just the homeless.

Reply
Joanna Lee
1
Joanna Lee

Safety should be the biggest concern here. If these people are homeless, they can travel to another area to reside. Forest service doesn't always implement preventative measures. So this being one of the times they do. Its important to make sure it happens. Before there is anymore devastating fires.

Reply
Shane Murray
1
Shane Murray

The homeless have trashed the forest out there. It makes me sick

Reply
Greg Deadbolt Leach
1
Greg Deadbolt Leach

Time to move these people to the Attorneys and Judges front lawns!!!

Reply
Karen Thrower
1
Karen Thrower

The China Hat area has been badly damaged and disrespected by campers.

Reply
Jeannie H.
1
Jeannie H.

How is this their "home"? Have they paid property tax like the rest of us? How is this state even justifying this?!?!

Reply
Nancy
1
Nancy

They’ve had plenty of time to move. Why can the homeless trash/burn our beautiful forest? Tax paying citizens are only allowed to camp for 14 days! What about the homeowners rights near China Hat, they need to feel safe in their own community! This has gone on way too long and I’m surprised!

Reply
Lynn Marie Leehmann
1
Lynn Marie Leehmann

If you look at the Federal Regulations for camping on Federal land it states only 14 days. These people have over stated their welcome, they need to go and they have known about this for at least six months.

Reply
Brad Aimone
1
Brad Aimone

It is ironic the Bend Equity Group has filed a lawsuit to block the closure. Where is the indignation for the horrible environmental damage done by these campers who’ve violated the USFS long standing limit of a 14 day stay in a primitive camp site?

Reply
Nancy Roquero
1
Nancy Roquero

This has gone on too long. The forests near Woodside community and other neighborhoods need fire protection and protection from the homeless with guns and vicious dogs and the garbage left behind. The homeless have had plenty of notice.

Reply
Lisa York
1
Lisa York

the USFS has been planning this burn since Oct 2019... more than enough time for the homeless/advocacy groups to come up with a plan to move...

Reply
Debbie Boyd
1
Debbie Boyd

This has been going on for way too long & it is ridiculous to postpone as they have known this needs to be done. The forest needs to be protected & these do gooders are too late to the game & so much time & money spent on homeless with ZERO results. We need DOGE. for Oregon!

Reply
Marie Gilbert
0
Marie Gilbert

We live near China Hat and the fear of fire and crime is constant. Plus the forest is being destroyed by illegal cutting of trees, garbage and toxins

Reply
Bendlover
0
Bendlover

I haven't felt safe hiking or biking there for years due to the aggressive homeless people out there.

Reply
Pam
0
Pam

We need to ensure that the lands are managed for the enjoyment/needs of all peoples, not a select few

Reply
pamcuny
0
pamcuny

I worry every year WHO is in the woods starting fires, whether deliberate or unintentional consequences…

Reply
Jeff Sanders
0
Jeff Sanders

I live near China Hat and used to love going out the with my dog. Once weapons started be pulled on people that stopped. I want my forest back. Good riddance to the whole lot. Don't ever come back.

Reply
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

There needs to be more homeless shelters in the city!

Reply
Kim Kahl
0
Kim Kahl

The danger of fire starting in this area is incredibly high and impacts large subdivisions. It is mandatory to close this area for the safety of all. This should not be a place for camping to be allowed as it has been.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT