Husker Max

Husker Max

huskermax.com
Everything you ever wanted to know about the Huskers www.huskermax.com
NCAA bans satellite camps - Can you see any good reason for this?
Husker Max Asked by Husker Max
7/9/2016

NCAA bans satellite camps - Can you see any good reason for this?

16%
Yes

0

84%
No WINNER

25

16%
Yes

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

84%
No

24 Comments
donniemahoney
4
donniemahoney

It only hurts the student athlete. But that is what the NCAA always tries to do.

Reply
Lou Cabello
Lou Cabello

all i think this is is the ncaa being afraid to govern the scc conference because they dont want an compatition

Rory Cook
1
Rory Cook

It only hurts the kids whose parents can afford to haul them around the country for camps. Stupid ruling by the NCAA and those six conferences. 2 that wanted to stop it and 4 who can't afford to do

Reply
Andrew Shields
1
Andrew Shields

Paid off by the ACC and SEC

Reply
Daniel Revas
1
Daniel Revas

This is proof that the SEC and ESPN are ruling College Football, and not in a good way. There are a lot of kids in the South that live in real poverty. They can't afford to go anywhere to Camp more than a short drive from home. Which is how the SEC and ACC like it.

Reply
Brian
0
Brian

Mike Leach said it best. The only reason anyone would want them banned is either they're lazy or they're selfishly guarding their recruiting area.

Reply
Kevin Hamilton
0
Kevin Hamilton

Just another way to keep the SEC on top.

Reply
Scott Ferguson
0
Scott Ferguson

Seems they want the SEC ACC to have every advantage available?

Reply
Matt Honke
0
Matt Honke

Anything that limits the opportunities for student athletes is a move in the wrong direction by the NCAA, and this limits opportunities. In addition, with official paid JR year visits not available yet, it is difficult for NU to get players onto campus until their SR year, which can be too late.

Reply
Visitor
0
Visitor

What's wrong with giving young men exposure to opportunities?

Reply
Jerry Williams
0
Jerry Williams

it does not help potential student athletes, especially those without the money to travel. Another door slams in the face of the lower income. A compromise between no camps and going wild with camps should have been reached.

Reply
Brenden Stai
0
Brenden Stai

Where is the democratic process. How about conducting a panel of all conferences to see if it is a viable option to create a bit more parody among them. Rather, let the powers that may be; ie SEC- inparticular Alabama Nick Saben...who, o BTW have 2 private jets to use to go after 4/5 star HS athlete

Reply
Timothy Costello
0
Timothy Costello

Whatever is best for the student/athlete.

Reply
Mike Dwiggins
0
Mike Dwiggins

Underprivileged high school kids' exposure will be diminished or limited to just those universities in their region, and will not see additional opportunities/offers from other outside universities.

Reply
Jerry L. Hammon
0
Jerry L. Hammon

The only reason this has happened is that the SEC is trying to protect its territory at the expense of the student-athlete. The SEC wants to cherry pick and leave the also rans scrambling for schools to attend,

Reply
Christopher Richling
0
Christopher Richling

This hurts athletes, but it hurts poor athletes more than anyone else.

Reply
Rizeabuv Yorzelf
0
Rizeabuv Yorzelf

Especially hurts Nebraska. Helps the schools with a Ton of talent in their backyard.

Reply
Stephen Johnson
0
Stephen Johnson

Just a ruling to protect home terf advantage in populus states. Hurts the opportunity of players.

Reply
Lou Cabello
0
Lou Cabello

southen teams must rof a little competition

Reply
Arlie Rauch
0
Arlie Rauch

It's difficult to grasp how a regulation or restriction imposed from the top down can improve competition and help the quality of play. But that's not what they had in mind, of course.

Reply
Todd Brindley
0
Todd Brindley

Did the NCAA indicate why this was in the best interest of the Student-Athlete? Satellite camps provided more opportunities for the Student Athlete to gain exposure to coaches and programs they otherwise wouldn't. This is the SEC tail wagging the NCAA dog, protecting its 'turf'.

Reply
Visitor
0
Visitor

For northern schools, it is a chance to have greater visibility in the warmer climates. The southern schools do not want to lose recruits to the northern schools running camps in their back yard!

Reply
Ron Huffman
0
Ron Huffman

College's should be able to go anywhere for more exposure. ..Ncaa is wrong and corrupt. ..siding with the sec . conference. .

Reply
Valerie Gilmore
0
Valerie Gilmore

the NCAA is put in place to further the student athlete not hinder them. and there won't be any push back on this either i'm guessing. what's SEC stand for?

Reply
Dan Cubrich
Dan Cubrich

Valerie, does the SEC = Southern effing corruption?

Andrew LaFevre
0
Andrew LaFevre

Everyone should know by now

Reply
How should Nebraska address officiating controversies?

How should Nebraska address officiating controversies?

Focus on our game, not the refs

0

Speak out and push for accountability

0

Focus on our game, not the refs

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

Speak out and push for accountability

0 Comment
No one has commented yet
For Nebraska's offensive strategy moving forward, would you prefer:

For Nebraska's offensive strategy moving forward, would you prefer:

A strong, identifiable style?

3

A more adaptive and varied approach?

1

A strong, identifiable style?

3 Comments
Robert Lloyd
0
Robert Lloyd

I would love to see us move forward and fire Saterfield. Then RUN baby RUN!!! Short of that, Matt Rhule will eventually be an assistant coach in the NFL. That would be sad as he is a super guy.

Reply
Larry Ewart
0
Larry Ewart

If the Huskers win at OSU they will have righted their ship

Reply

A more adaptive and varied approach?

1 Comment
James Key
1
James Key

3 TE's and a RB!! Run Forest Run

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT