Asked by Husker Max

5/5/2014

Has Husker football lost the connection with former players?

49%

Yes

51%

No WINNER

49%

Yes

6 Comments

Rick Reynolds

Ex players would not publicly say so if it were not so.They are the most loyal contingent to Husker Sports.

Doug Einsel

In these days of social media, the former Huskers do not positively promote the program. They only seem to come out and criticize.

Tim Bangert

Callahan destroyed any relationships with former players and not enough has been done to repair it,

John E Skoglund

It's the right thing to do.

Patrick Sullivan

No guts, no glory.

Michael Cosyn

This voting should really only be done by former players. And they are saying "yes."

51%

No

6 Comments

Wm Salyers

I believe the door is always open to ex=players.

Arlie Rauch

Because I don't really know

Fearless Phil

not all former players are supportive of Coach Pelini, but it's not because Bo doesn't welcome former players

Keith Petrie

not totally...but it could be better!!!

Stephen Johnson

No players have complained

Wally Younger

Because Bo always welcome players from the past.

Asked by Husker Max

44 Votes

Is Nebraska's offensive line improving?

43%

They're getting better. They're getting better.

57%

Needs more work. Needs more work.

43%

They're getting better.

0 Comment

No one has commented yet

57%

Needs more work.

1 Comment

Brian Machan

We need a complete overhaul of personnel. Coaching is there, talent isn't.

Thoughts on Nebraska's offensive strategy shift?

Asked by Husker Max

719 Votes

Thoughts on Nebraska's offensive strategy shift?

69%

Exciting change for better Exciting change for better

31%

Skeptical of sudden shift Skeptical of sudden shift

69%

Exciting change for better

7 Comments

Don Buckingham

Glad to see an acknowledgement that the O wasn't working. This shows some urgency about winning which I appreciate.

Bill Greim

Seems pretty obvious that when something is not working very well and you don’t know how to fix it you bring in outside experts for advise. Common practice.

Brad Bredenkamp

Holgerson has enough experience that he should be able to watch some film and the players in practice and call plays that play to their strengths. I'm betting he is also smart enough to stick with what's working until the other team stops it, and to develop some offensive rhythm.

Robert Lloyd

Anything is better than Satterfield. But I don't know why we didn't go after the US Army's OC who only makes $190k and absolutely knows how to run the ball.

Brad Bredenkamp

Because Army's OC can call the triple option and run the ball, but he probably doesn't know how to call for a pro-style quarterback. Plus it is very unlikely that Army's OC is going to jump ship right now the way their season is going. Maybe gets a look after the season if Holgerson doesn't stay.

Dick Plock

Needed change for quite a many games. Our offensive & defense coordinators are being out smarted.

Jean McGee

Satt has been wasting Raiola’s passing strength.

klirvine@bresnan.net

we need an offence

31%

Skeptical of sudden shift

3 Comments

VAHuskerFan

I refuse to get my hopes up

Craig S

Installing a whole new offense would be very difficult. You might be able to refine a small portion but learning the timing and terminology would be difficult.

michael daly

The habits of almost 2 years don't change overnight. That being said, A new , more forceful, high expectation coach, might be able to snap them awake and Go

Husker Max

Has Husker football lost the connection with former players?

49% Yes

51% No WINNER

49% Yes

51% No

Is Nebraska's offensive line improving?

43% They're getting better. They're getting better.

57% Needs more work. Needs more work.

43% They're getting better.

57% Needs more work.

Thoughts on Nebraska's offensive strategy shift?

69% Exciting change for better Exciting change for better

31% Skeptical of sudden shift Skeptical of sudden shift

69% Exciting change for better

31% Skeptical of sudden shift

49%

Yes

51%

No WINNER

49%

Yes

51%

No

43%

They're getting better. They're getting better.

57%

Needs more work. Needs more work.

43%

They're getting better.

57%

Needs more work.

69%

Exciting change for better Exciting change for better

31%

Skeptical of sudden shift Skeptical of sudden shift

69%

Exciting change for better

31%

Skeptical of sudden shift