Husker Max

Husker Max

huskermax.com
Everything you ever wanted to know about the Huskers www.huskermax.com
Eye test ... is Iowa really the best team in the #B1G right now?
Husker Max Asked by Husker Max
12/5/2015

Eye test ... is Iowa really the best team in the #B1G right now?

26%
Definitely

0

74%
No Way WINNER

5

26%
Definitely

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

74%
No Way

4 Comments
Dan Cubrich
0
Dan Cubrich

If West Coast Riley had gotten his head out of his ass, Nebraska would have won the Iowa game. Allowing an erratic QB like TA to throw 45 passes was just plain sinful, I mean what was the point in doing that unless West Coast wanted to lose the damn game!!! 15 to 20 passes tops for TA this season.

Reply
Dan Cubrich
Dan Cubrich

15 to 20 passes tops per game this season for TA. He was just too erratic and dangerous for any more passes per game. Nebraska has a much tougher schedule next year, so West Coast Riley better not allow TA to pass 50 times per game, otherwise we'll see another losing season.

Faye Cook
0
Faye Cook

NO WAY Withut four intereptions huskers win that game, and especially if they woud cut down on the penalties. ALhugh tht enalty against guery the slo mo showed he urned his left shulder into the player,. Normally that goes upstairs for decision, but obviously the refs had decided Iowa was o win this

Reply
Ron Huffman
0
Ron Huffman

Powder puff schedule. WISCONSIN IS DOWN AND NORTHWESTERN WAS SLEEPING. .

Reply
CFP Odds: Overhyped?

CFP Odds: Overhyped?

Too Generous!

1

Fair Assessment!

0

Too Generous!

1 Comment
Thomas Wright
0
Thomas Wright

As Jim Mora once said . “PLAYOFFS …. Are you kidding me ……” 😂😂😂 But seriously, it’ll take time. Shoot how long did it take T.O. ? HAVE TO recruit the 5 stars to reach the playoffs anymore ! Which schools are winning & ranked in the top 10 almost every year ? And look at their loaded rosters 🤷

Reply

Fair Assessment!

0 Comment
No one has commented yet
Faking injuries: Support proposed new rule or not?

Faking injuries: Support proposed new rule or not?

Support it

1

Oppose it

1

Support it

1 Comment

Oppose it

1 Comment
Stephen Scannell
0
Stephen Scannell

Because they should have to get rid of two rules for every new one. These incompetent buffoons that are so called experts and review analysts can’t even agree on what’s a catch. How are these overpaid bozos going to determine if a guy is hurt. Heck the doctors can’t without further testing sometimes

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT