Husker Max

Husker Max

huskermax.com
Everything you ever wanted to know about the Huskers www.huskermax.com
Do you think the Big 10 should make any conference alignment changes in response to the SEC moves?

Do you think the Big 10 should make any conference alignment changes in response to the SEC moves?

No hurry, just select high quality

3

Go big because the SEC is coming

12

No hurry, just select high quality

3 Comments
Robert Lloyd
1
Robert Lloyd

Make Barry Alvarez the Big 10 commissioner and surround him with good advisors and go from there. We can't lose with that. Don't strike out and add things without a top team in place to make the decisions.

Reply
Brandon Rolf
0
Brandon Rolf

Kansas and Iowa State...Kansas obviously strong in basketball and has numerous other athletic programs. Iowa State strong wrestling and doesn't have baseball therefore we back to an even amount of teams. Kick Purdue over to the east to be with Indiana full time.

Reply
Douglas Norman
0
Douglas Norman

If B1G can get good traditional football powers, then they should do it. I’m talking teams I with the academic standard they require and are good too. I’d even expand out to PAC12 and down to ACC. See if Notre Dame would reconsider. USC? UCLA, Stanford?

Reply

Go big because the SEC is coming

11 Comments
Steve Sexton
3
Steve Sexton

The Big 10 conference officials would be fools to assume the SEC has not already at least contacted Ohio State, Penn State and Michigan regarding joining. The only way to remain a viable conference long-term is to form a super conference to match the SEC's intentions. Strike from a position of power

Reply
Nick Tempo
Nick Tempo

It will be a cold day in hell before OSU and Michigan or any of the other original 10 depart for the SEC. I don't know what the loyalties are of the newer members, but I'm going to guess that they are also happy where they are as long as the money continues to flow.

Randy Weitzenkamp
1
Randy Weitzenkamp

Things appear to be moving fast and we certainly don't want to be on the outside looking in.

Reply
David Jorgensen
1
David Jorgensen

I say go to 20 teams by adding WA*, OR*, USC*, TCU, ASU, and either Okie St or CO*. Go two 10 team divisions playing round robin and two cross-over (11 total conference games) and 1 non-con. Just don't leave ourselves out of the south market! I don't acre about the AAU*.

Reply
G N
1
G N

you snooze you loose

Reply
Toby Leach
0
Toby Leach

We can enhance the conference by adding quality programs. Would love to see ND, KU, and say bye to Rutgers and Maryland. Add a couple other teams that make sense too.

Reply
Doug Miller
0
Doug Miller

Better make the move now.

Reply
Nick Tempo
0
Nick Tempo

Texas and Oklahoma maybe big name brands, but I don't think Texas is as big of a deal as they seem to think they are. Seriously, what has Texas ever done? They are an underachiever and they will continue to underachieve in the SEC. As for Oklahoma? I see them as being another LSU.

Reply
Ron Joseph
0
Ron Joseph

Yes, we have to go big - Go after the top 6 Pac 12 schools I can live wt Kansas if the Big 10 can convinced Norte Dame to join. If not, go after the Pac 12. Then let the orphan 8 & rest of Pac 12 form a conference

Reply
Mike Di Mauro
0
Mike Di Mauro

Merge the PAC, grab IA ST, Kan, Kan ST TX T from the Big 12, raid the ACC of Clemson and Notre Dame. You then have 32 teams. Use the NFL model You can beat the SEC and then have in one division a Penn St vs Clemson, a Notre Dame vs Ohio St, Oregon vs Michigan.

Reply
Travis Kreifels
0
Travis Kreifels

I like the idea of adding the 9 AAU schools: Arizona, UCLA, USC, Cal, Stanford, Oregon, Washington, Utah and Colorado. I'd then add 1 more team (ND??). 6 4 team pods. play your pod and two other pods for 11 games plus one non conference. should play all teams twice in 5 years.

Reply
Is the 34½-point spread against Akron about right?

Is the 34½-point spread against Akron about right?

Yes, the Huskers should roll.

3

No, too many issues need fixing.

10

Yes, the Huskers should roll.

3 Comments
Terrence Smith
0
Terrence Smith

Because the poll was still open on the Monday after the game... And I could not see the percentages without voting.

Reply
Brad Bredenkamp
0
Brad Bredenkamp

They have the talent, they need to take the step of winning the games they should win in the manner they should win them. Don’t play down to the level of the opponent.

Reply
PJ SAid
0
PJ SAid

It better be...defense front should be fixed and Akron Defense should allow for deeper passes. At HOME at NIGHT!!! #GBR

Reply

No, too many issues need fixing.

10 Comments
Patrick O'Brien
0
Patrick O'Brien

We haven't seen enough of what this team can really do to give that kind of spread.

Reply
William Osler
0
William Osler

They are not a good team yet. Much work to do.

Reply
Alan Portsche
0
Alan Portsche

To many issues to fix

Reply
VAHuskerFan
0
VAHuskerFan

There is NOWAY they will cover, there just not that good, atleast at this point.

Reply
Melvyn Halfon
0
Melvyn Halfon

I do not believe some of the glaring problems with the run defense have not been fixed, and Akron will exploit them.

Reply
Danny Brown
0
Danny Brown

The D-line against Cincy wasn't overly impressive, our run game was relatively unproductive, and we had some lucky breaks (even if good play contributed). The next two weeks will be important for closing gaps; I don't think we'll wallop Akron quite by 30+ points. I'm guessing we end up 17

Reply
Ed Starke
0
Ed Starke

It's hard to beat any team by that big of a margin.

Reply
McV0id
0
McV0id

Defense needs more time to cook

Reply
Does Nebraska’s 20-17 win over Cincinnati signal resilience or concern?

Does Nebraska’s 20-17 win over Cincinnati signal resilience or concern?

Resilience outweighs how it happened

4

Narrow win raises red flags

20

Resilience outweighs how it happened

4 Comments
Eric Bildt
0
Eric Bildt

We lose this game every time for years. The culture is changing; the confidence is growing; the return to excellence is near. The old fogies who still wish bread was a dime will denigrate the O & D lines & malign the play calling. They forget how bad things have been. This is better. This was a win.

Reply
tmhedlund@hotmail.com
0
tmhedlund@hotmail.com

Many times in the past, the Huskers looked not so good against mediocre teams in nonconference, then got their act together for a good season. The Michigan game will be the real barometer.

Reply
Ryan Morrow
0
Ryan Morrow

this time last year, this would have been a loss. Their backs were on the ropes, but managed to pull the W instead. Still need to learn how to keep the foot on the gas, and not let up in all 4 quarters...

Reply
Mike Conyers
0
Mike Conyers

Bearcats are the Huskers of 2024. They found a way lose through penalties and turnovers.

Reply

Narrow win raises red flags

20 Comments
Rick
1
Rick

What I saw in the trenches is very concerning. Also, that rinky dink 3 yards and a cloud of dust by the throwing the ball offense won't get it done against the big boys.

Reply
John Fillmore
1
John Fillmore

D-line is a definite concern. No sacks, no real pressure on their QB especially - when it really counted,

Reply
Mac Kinder
1
Mac Kinder

N was fortunate to win. The O and D lines were underwhelming vs an average B12 team. 8-4 might be optimistic.

Reply
dksntpa
0
dksntpa

Should have put on SPY on the QB, if that dude takes off, hammer his ass, period! Inside D looks like a problem, gap containment, giant hole.

Reply
Joe Hegarty
0
Joe Hegarty

I don't think NU can play much better and to only squeeze out a win is concerning.

Reply
VAHuskerFan
0
VAHuskerFan

There is a lot to be concerned about!!

Reply
Loren Zimmerman
0
Loren Zimmerman

The only improvement I saw was only one stupid penalty. A 79% passing rating was overblown with two and three yard completions. D-Line got blown off the ball.

Reply
Linda Ogren
0
Linda Ogren

DUMB NOT KICK BALL TOM WOULD HAVE MAKE FIELD LONGER WE RUN OUT CLOCK COME ON COACH

Reply
David Levesque
0
David Levesque

Maybe the weakest run defense I have ever seen in an NU uniform. It was scary bad.

Reply
Joe Nigro
0
Joe Nigro

If Riola is the QB they say he is, Turn Him Loose! !

Reply
Roger Shriver
0
Roger Shriver

In the last 5 games in 2024 plus this game, NU has only managed to score more than 20 points once with Holgersen's play calling. The OL and DL wasn't impressive. The defense had trouble stopping the run even though Cincy couldn't throw effectively. Do not drink the Kool-Aid yet!

Reply
Bill Petty
0
Bill Petty

Last seven minutes, Cincy marches down the field and scores, Huskers can't put a final drive together and punt on 4th and 14. Cincy gets ball on the 10, marches, easily, down the field and, thankfully, throws the game away on a poorly executed pass in the end zone. we were dominated in the 4th qrt

Reply
Randy Essex
0
Randy Essex

No RB depth. Johnson is a star, but will get hurt early in the season if that load continues. D gashed by runs over and over. O didn’t finish drives.

Reply
Ron Joseph
0
Ron Joseph

When compared to preseason hype the win raises flags on what is real and what isn’t. The hype = 1995 levels for a team that at best may be a 7 or 8 win team

Reply
PJ SAid
0
PJ SAid

First off, Cincinatti is better team than Nebraska fans think. But, I was disappointed there is no RB2, Need more deep pass attempts, DLine is smallish & soft. Specail teams look okay so far. My win total has dropped to 7 or 8 vs. 9 wins.

Reply
Robert Lloyd
0
Robert Lloyd

We just aren't there yet. But thank God for our special teams. What a turn around. We need some linemen, both offense and defense.

Reply
Draven DiMera
0
Draven DiMera

OL showed zero improvement and DL definitely has downgraded. Only 1 legit RB. WRs struggled to get separation. Once again misled by the biased Nebraska media during the offseason. Exactly why I don't drink the Kool-Aid

Reply
William Osler
0
William Osler

Good teams always start better than this. Only slightly better than last year. Special Teams did not loose the game this time.

Reply
Dave Perry
0
Dave Perry

Offense should have scored more points. Look at the Illinois win.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT