Husker Max

Husker Max

huskermax.com
Everything you ever wanted to know about the Huskers www.huskermax.com
Do you accept and/or embrace the Riley offensive philosophy?
Husker Max Asked by Husker Max
7/18/2017

Do you accept and/or embrace the Riley offensive philosophy?

53%
Yes WINNER

4

47%
No

13

53%
Yes

3 Comments
Jerry Williams
0
Jerry Williams

I did not want to be negative. Right now we do not know what it will be like next year. I have hopes,

Reply
Jody Acree
0
Jody Acree

We will see for sure this year and going forward if his offensive philosophy will work with pro style QB's. This is a wait and see thing. I'm willing to give it a chance.

Reply

47%
No

13 Comments
Rick Chambers
1
Rick Chambers

We need a dual threat q-back who can throw or run to get out of the pocket, I do not want to see a 70% passing game.

Reply
Visitor
1
Visitor

Absolutely not, it will not work at nebraska because it is a low populated cold weather state and NO ONE can load up on 5 star talent tat NU to compete with the other schools in the high populated warm weather areas.. We need to be unique again in what we do and have the entire state supporting it.

Reply
Richard Johnson
1
Richard Johnson

I prefer the run offense, wear 'em down and win in the 4th quarter. A mobile QB that can pass accurately as well as get out of trouble and run.

Reply
Ned Watson
0
Ned Watson

I am unsure that the way Riley seems to be going with the offense is the right way. All of the top teams in the country last year had a dual threat QB and that is for a reason: It's hard to defend 11 guys than just 10. We'll just have to wait and see what happens.

Reply
Mark Danahy
0
Mark Danahy

We didn't run the ball effectively with players that can run in 2016. We will be pass oriented in 2017. If we don't get more proficient at the run we are going to be hurting. I don't care if you run the ball 50% of the time, it all fails if you can't get yardage with the run. 3rd & long in 2017.

Reply
Guest
0
Guest

I prefer winning!!!

Reply
Mr. Harold
0
Mr. Harold

Unless you have talent like USC, you need a QB who can run in college football today.

Reply
Cooper Bernardi
0
Cooper Bernardi

With our offensive lines of recent years a drop back passing QB will be meat for other teams defenses to eat up

Reply
Isaiah Skrdla
0
Isaiah Skrdla

Pro style offenses have been solved. Their success relies heavily on a very high level of nationally coveted talent which makes consistency an issue even for teams that have every recruiting advantage. There are other more college friendly schemes that get better results from less talent.

Reply
Keith Petrie
0
Keith Petrie

I have had problems with the consistency of play calling. I will say I probably will like the first couple of years better than what is coming... I like a mobile QB who can throw the ball on the move and run the option. I like to see a QB who can run play action and go deep. Speed and power! GBR

Reply
Brent Matz
0
Brent Matz

Old, slow and predictable. No misdirection. Averages slightly over two plays a minute - one of the slowest in the country. No one is surprise by what we do.

Reply
Kurtis Ramsey
0
Kurtis Ramsey

I could change my mind after it seeing it ran by a true passing qb but from the little we saw of it, it looks like big 10 defenses already know how to shut it down.

Reply
Stephen Johnson
0
Stephen Johnson

Osborne tried a passing offense in 1973 to 1979. Did not work in the plaines.

Reply
Donnie Mahoney
Donnie Mahoney

What Osborne and the 70's have to do with it? LOL

Are you OK with Nebraska's canceling of the Tennessee series?

Are you OK with Nebraska's canceling of the Tennessee series?

Yes, it's a financial necessity.

3

No, it appears cowardly.

8

Yes, it's a financial necessity.

2 Comments
Thomas Wright
0
Thomas Wright

Exactly what Jeremy just said …. duh 😂

Reply
Jeremy Lojack
0
Jeremy Lojack

No matter how bad it looks, Dannen has to do what's necessary to keep the athletic department in the black financially. That's the bottom line. He can't allow millions in revenue to be lost just to save face.

Reply

No, it appears cowardly.

8 Comments
John Lund
1
John Lund

Live in Nashville and have been waiting for this game for years. TN canceled the first one for the VTech game in Bristol. We need to be playing more elite teams outside the big10. That was what the expanded playoffs were for, more best on best games. Now we look like the typical SEC team, weak.

Reply
Kelly Smith
1
Kelly Smith

Stadium Reno is a horrible excuse. It is cowardice....

Reply
Jeremy Lojack
Jeremy Lojack

It's not cowardice. Dannen only recently was given the numbers on when and how much the South Stadium renovation would cost. He made this move to add an 8th home game to keep the athletic dept from losing millions of $$.

VAHuskerFan
1
VAHuskerFan

It definitely seems very cowardly, very disappointed.

Reply
Suicide Slush Puppie
0
Suicide Slush Puppie

Not all fans live in Big 10 country, and this was the one game on a future schedule that was within driving distance for me. Not to mention the Smoky Mountains would've been a great travel destination for our fans. The "stadium remodel" excuse seems like a cop-out.

Reply
Leo Jelinek
0
Leo Jelinek

Gets Rhule two wins and makes Dannebrog look good.

Reply
Will the men's basketball Huskers make NCAA tourney?

Will the men's basketball Huskers make NCAA tourney?

Definitely in

0

On the bubble

4

Definitely in

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

On the bubble

4 Comments
Randy Weitzenkamp
0
Randy Weitzenkamp

Unfortunately, that January slide might be a bit too much to overcome. I hope they prove me wrong.

Reply
Jeremy Lojack
0
Jeremy Lojack

With their record, they'll be lucky to sneak into the tourney. NIT seems more likely.

Reply
George mcdaniel
0
George mcdaniel

It is 50 50 if they will make it or not

Reply
Roger Shriver
0
Roger Shriver

No great BIG teams this year so they sneak in, get a 9 or 10 seed, and continue their perfect record in the Big Dance :).

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT