Husker Max

Husker Max

huskermax.com
Everything you ever wanted to know about the Huskers www.huskermax.com
Do you accept and/or embrace the Riley offensive philosophy?
Husker Max Asked by Husker Max
7/18/2017

Do you accept and/or embrace the Riley offensive philosophy?

53%
Yes WINNER

4

47%
No

13

53%
Yes

3 Comments
Jerry Williams
0
Jerry Williams

I did not want to be negative. Right now we do not know what it will be like next year. I have hopes,

Reply
Jody Acree
0
Jody Acree

We will see for sure this year and going forward if his offensive philosophy will work with pro style QB's. This is a wait and see thing. I'm willing to give it a chance.

Reply

47%
No

13 Comments
Rick Chambers
1
Rick Chambers

We need a dual threat q-back who can throw or run to get out of the pocket, I do not want to see a 70% passing game.

Reply
Visitor
1
Visitor

Absolutely not, it will not work at nebraska because it is a low populated cold weather state and NO ONE can load up on 5 star talent tat NU to compete with the other schools in the high populated warm weather areas.. We need to be unique again in what we do and have the entire state supporting it.

Reply
Richard Johnson
1
Richard Johnson

I prefer the run offense, wear 'em down and win in the 4th quarter. A mobile QB that can pass accurately as well as get out of trouble and run.

Reply
Ned Watson
0
Ned Watson

I am unsure that the way Riley seems to be going with the offense is the right way. All of the top teams in the country last year had a dual threat QB and that is for a reason: It's hard to defend 11 guys than just 10. We'll just have to wait and see what happens.

Reply
Mark Danahy
0
Mark Danahy

We didn't run the ball effectively with players that can run in 2016. We will be pass oriented in 2017. If we don't get more proficient at the run we are going to be hurting. I don't care if you run the ball 50% of the time, it all fails if you can't get yardage with the run. 3rd & long in 2017.

Reply
Guest
0
Guest

I prefer winning!!!

Reply
Mr. Harold
0
Mr. Harold

Unless you have talent like USC, you need a QB who can run in college football today.

Reply
Cooper Bernardi
0
Cooper Bernardi

With our offensive lines of recent years a drop back passing QB will be meat for other teams defenses to eat up

Reply
Isaiah Skrdla
0
Isaiah Skrdla

Pro style offenses have been solved. Their success relies heavily on a very high level of nationally coveted talent which makes consistency an issue even for teams that have every recruiting advantage. There are other more college friendly schemes that get better results from less talent.

Reply
Keith Petrie
0
Keith Petrie

I have had problems with the consistency of play calling. I will say I probably will like the first couple of years better than what is coming... I like a mobile QB who can throw the ball on the move and run the option. I like to see a QB who can run play action and go deep. Speed and power! GBR

Reply
Brent Matz
0
Brent Matz

Old, slow and predictable. No misdirection. Averages slightly over two plays a minute - one of the slowest in the country. No one is surprise by what we do.

Reply
Kurtis Ramsey
0
Kurtis Ramsey

I could change my mind after it seeing it ran by a true passing qb but from the little we saw of it, it looks like big 10 defenses already know how to shut it down.

Reply
Stephen Johnson
0
Stephen Johnson

Osborne tried a passing offense in 1973 to 1979. Did not work in the plaines.

Reply
Donnie Mahoney
Donnie Mahoney

What Osborne and the 70's have to do with it? LOL

Does Rhule’s “destination job” comment ease worries about a coaching departure?

Does Rhule’s “destination job” comment ease worries about a coaching departure?

Yes — sounds committed

2

No — talk is cheap

2

Yes — sounds committed

2 Comments
PJ SAid
0
PJ SAid

I feel it ease worries a LITTLE bit. I think he has already talked to his friend Pat, AD at Penn State, and was told that Penn State Alumni want someone more proven than Rhule. So, Rhule is way down the list.

Reply
MIchael Bennett
0
MIchael Bennett

I think Rhule wants to finish what he started

Reply

No — talk is cheap

2 Comments
VAHuskerFan
0
VAHuskerFan

No, it means nothing, he is gone or he woulda squashed it and said he was taking his name out of consideration and he didn’t.

Reply
Scott Reed
0
Scott Reed

What else would he say...It really sucks here??? He hasn't said, "I'm not interested in the Penn State Job".

Reply
Is bringing Banana Ball to Memorial Stadium a smart move for Nebraska athletics?

Is bringing Banana Ball to Memorial Stadium a smart move for Nebraska athletics?

Yes – diversifies stadium use

5

No – distracts from core sports

2

Yes – diversifies stadium use

5 Comments
Troy Dunaway
1
Troy Dunaway

Empty - worthless. Full - revenue. This is a no brainer.

Reply
John Shelkop
0
John Shelkop

Memorial Stadium is one of the greatest venues in sports. Why shouldn't the folks in Lincoln, Omaha, and all of Nebraska get the opportunity to be entertained by any show worthy of a stadium sized audience? So much CHA-CHING!

Reply
Echo Kinsella
0
Echo Kinsella

These are fun talented guys and should be seen.

Reply
Dennis Lambert
0
Dennis Lambert

I saw a Larry the Cable Guy show in Memorial Stadium. Didn't have anything to do with "sports"

Reply

No – distracts from core sports

2 Comments
Roy Katskee
0
Roy Katskee

you must be kidding!

Reply
Joe Nigro
0
Joe Nigro

I hope this is a joke. Nothing to do with sports.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT