ABC 17 News

ABC 17 News

abc17news.com/polls/
Mid-Missouri's source for breaking news, weather & sports. ABC 17 News is a product of NPG of Missouri, LLC.
Should the Supreme Court put workplace vaccination mandates on hold?

Should the Supreme Court put workplace vaccination mandates on hold?

Yes

8

No

1

Yes

Should the Supreme Court put workplace vaccination mandates on hold?
7 Comments
Peter Wexler
3
Peter Wexler

1) There is no legal recourse if something goes wrong. 2) These dangerous gene therapies have never been tried before. 3) The chief executive does not make laws. 4) Something needs to happen to Joe Biden.

Reply
Max
3
Max

Biden has no authority to do this, and he will soon find that out.

Reply
Larry Sabulsky
2
Larry Sabulsky

Mandates need to go away. Freedom needs to return.

Reply
Paul Hamby
2
Paul Hamby

not the role of the federal government. the mandate is unconstitutional and that is the question the high court should be answering

Reply
Fredrick Green
2
Fredrick Green

It's not the government's job to tell someone to get a vaccination. While I promote getting the vaccine it is up to the person to make their decision on receiving the vaccine.

Reply
Jacob G
1
Jacob G

It is now known public info that the vaccines do not prevent the vaccinated from spreading COVID19. Therefore the mandate, targeting only the unvaxxed for weekly testing does not stop the vaccinated from workplace spread.

Reply
Lisa Gore
1
Lisa Gore

It is illegal for the government to claim they are smarter than every citizen in the US for making our own sound intelligent medical decisions like they have a conservatorship over us. It’s called Parens Patrae, also the Brandon-admin lawyer said the unvaxed are a threat to vaxed=vaxes dont work🇺🇸

Reply

No

Should the Supreme Court put workplace vaccination mandates on hold?
1 Comment
Sue Evans
0
Sue Evans

Employers are expected to provide a safe working environment. Employers providing health insurance benefit will have tor raise premiums or stop offering all together.

Reply
Max
Max

Forcing a person to inject a foreign substance into their body, is not providing a safe work environment for that person, or for anyone else. It is also unconstitutional.

Do you agree that paid sick leave requirements were too big a burden on employers?

Do you agree that paid sick leave requirements were too big a burden on employers?

Yes

2

No

1

Yes

2 Comments
Fat Guy Outdoors
1
Fat Guy Outdoors

There wasn't such a thing as sick days in the Army. You were told to quit being a female body part and ruckup and draw fire.

Reply
Toasty
1
Toasty

The new paid sick leave requirements were another 'problem' that didn't exist and certainly didn't require more government regulation.

Reply

No

1 Comment
Sara Kalinowski
0
Sara Kalinowski

If you staff correctly & uphold attendance policies, there shouldn't be an issue. Unwell employees means non-productive employees. If you can afford expensive vacations, then you can take care of your employees. It's that simple.

Reply
Are you happy to see local police taking part in immigration operations?

Are you happy to see local police taking part in immigration operations?

Yes

6

No

8

Yes

6 Comments
Fat Guy Outdoors
1
Fat Guy Outdoors

Of course, isn't locking up people who are criminals their jobs?

Reply
Thomas OSullivan
1
Thomas OSullivan

This is a matter of law and order. I have no problem with immigrants coming to this country LEGALLY. Immigrants built this country and are a valuable asset but there is a LEGAL process that must be followed. Biden, Majorkas were disasters when it came to illegal immigration.

Reply
Eric Smith
1
Eric Smith

We might get a bit closer to having fair elections without those voting who aren't even citizens.

Reply
Fred
Fred

Yes, that would be a problem that needs to be addressed ... if it actually existed.

Toasty
1
Toasty

Immigration laws exist for a reason. I can agree our current immigration process is too complicated, expensive, and ripe with corruption. The solution is to change the process, not allow people to stay here illegally.

Reply
Jim Rosenberg
1
Jim Rosenberg

Illegal is Illegal, no matter the situation. Law enforcement is there for a reason, to enforce the laws. If I was in another country illegally, then law enforcement in that country would do the same thing, but probably jail time first. Without laws and law enforcement there would be anarchy.

Reply
Zaos Gonzolez
1
Zaos Gonzolez

Just like a Macy's sale, "they all must go!"

Reply

No

6 Comments
Jennifer Parsons
2
Jennifer Parsons

This is not a matter of legality. "IlLeGaL" immigration is a misdemeanor, like jaywalking or speeding. That people are being apprehended at immigration court dates, schools, and churches shows that these people are not dangerous nor violent. And finally, detention without due process is kidnapping.

Reply
Jeffery Schuyler
2
Jeffery Schuyler

This is not only anti-american, but it is cruel, inhumane and counterproductive. Trump has managed to convince half our Country that 65 million immigrants are both an imminent threat and less than human. Worse, most of the people believing these lies are Christians.

Reply
Bobbi Meyer
2
Bobbi Meyer

Immigrants aren't the problem, politicians are

Reply
Leslie
1
Leslie

They should focus on protecting the community from the reported crimes and not engaging in the current racial profiling that immigration authorities have been doing.

Reply
Paula Stanley
1
Paula Stanley

Police resources should not be used for ICE operations. Congress just voted for an unbelievably huge budget for their police state. Don’t use local community resources!

Reply
Sara Kalinowski
0
Sara Kalinowski

This is a hard question. ICE isn't explaining anything or identifying themselves. PO's might follow protocol,better. However, they shouldn't have to be involved.To be fair though, I think we spend too much unnecessary time on immigration & nothing else that truly matters.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT