ABC 17 News
ABC 17 News

ABC 17 News

abc17news.com/polls/
Mid-Missouri's source for breaking news, weather & sports. ABC 17 News is a product of NPG of Missouri, LLC.
Should insurance companies charge unvaccinated people higher premiums?

Should insurance companies charge unvaccinated people higher premiums?

Yes

10

No

12

Yes

Should insurance companies charge unvaccinated people higher premiums?
10 Comments
Tim Wanner
0
Tim Wanner

The vaccine works. It's a medical fix for a disease that can kill.

Reply
Rhonda McElhannon
0
Rhonda McElhannon

Because it's real problem. Anyone with the truth that God gives us is vaccinated.

Reply
Eve Bosnick
0
Eve Bosnick

I don't want to pay higher premiums for the hospitalization and care and treatment of people who choose not to protect themselves. They should take responsibility for their free decisions . I also think sick pts unvaccianted patients should pay a higher copay

Reply
Adam Schrader
0
Adam Schrader

Absolutely. They want to put all of our lives at risk, they can pay more for being stupid

Reply
Royce Schreiber
0
Royce Schreiber

It is their personal choice and choices have consequences (besides getting the vaccinated sick)

Reply
Adam Schrader
Adam Schrader

Absolutely

lois tyler
0
lois tyler

I voted yes because if a unvaccinated person gets Covid and is hospitalized it is costly and will increase insurance rates for all of us, the vaccine is free ,insurance premiums will rise for everyone. I do think the unvaccinated people should pay higher premiums and the vaccinated should not .

Reply
Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

If you have had a severe allergic reaction (anaphylaxis) or an immediate allergic reaction, even if it was not severe, to any ingredient in an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (such as polyethylene glycol), you should not get an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.

No

Should insurance companies charge unvaccinated people higher premiums?
12 Comments
Vera Jackson
2
Vera Jackson

Why should the un-vaccinated be bullied to do something we have the right to refuse. Talk about discrimination!!!! That's un-American.

Reply
Zaos Gonzolez
2
Zaos Gonzolez

Should insurance companies charge higher premiums for the OBESE?!?!?!?!?

Reply
Adam Schrader
Adam Schrader

Yes!!!! You obviously don't care about your health, so pay for your ignorance.

Vera Jackson
Vera Jackson

That was rude Adam, and very discrimative

Max DeYoung
1
Max DeYoung

People with blue eyes should also get better Auto insurance premiums, however my wife has Brown eyes, she should be given a discount, because she was wise enough to marry me. After all everything should be treated fairly.

Reply
Eve Bosnick
Eve Bosnick

Completely illogical analogy . Take responsibility for your choice to not vaccinate - if you get sick - you're responsible for it . I don't want to pay for you , your family and all the people your are infecting because of your decision . TAKE Responsibility for your actions and be a man , right?

Donna Leake Scoggins
1
Donna Leake Scoggins

That is just crazy! Really?

Reply
Zaos Gonzolez
1
Zaos Gonzolez

Well, like, I’m a like smoker. And like, yes because I’m fat and yes I smoke. But seriously, Joe Biden should pay for my premiums, and for the other FATS!

Reply
illuminatedi
0
illuminatedi

they already have trillions

Reply
Fun Garbage
0
Fun Garbage

The person who made this and everyone who thinks this is a good idea should be drowned. Poor people have it hard enough without breathing the same air as this scum.

Reply
Avenged Knot
0
Avenged Knot

They don’t charge for those that choose to be unvaccinated for any other vaccine, so this is discriminatory

Reply
Jingle Bells
0
Jingle Bells

Charge the fat people more for insurance.

Reply
Eve Bosnick
Eve Bosnick

FAT people hurt themselves ... not me ... be as fat as you want ! and die young from diabetes and heart disease - your decision - but your diabetes / heart disease / doesn't kill me and my children and my neighbors ... I'll contribute to your care until you die early . I fully support your freedom

Lisa Gore
0
Lisa Gore

Because it’s experimental vaccine...it’s stupid to “require it” in the first place with CV 99.98% survivable...

Reply
Is it time to end most mask mandates?

Is it time to end most mask mandates?

Yes

4

No

4

Yes

Is it time to end most mask mandates?
4 Comments
Max DeYoung
2
Max DeYoung

If your mask fogs up your glasses, or if you can smell odors through it, then it doesn't work. It should have never existed in the first place.

Reply
Kevin Wilkins
1
Kevin Wilkins

The pandemic is coming to and end. Also it is illegal to mandate anyone to wear a mask or get a vaccine for that matter, we are not under a dictatorship nor are we in a communist country. Wearing a mask or getting a shot is each person's personal choice and right.

Reply
Will Mason
1
Will Mason

Not "most". End them all.

Reply

No

Is it time to end most mask mandates?
4 Comments
Harry D
1
Harry D

Even though humans have survived the evolution process for many thousands of years without masks or vaccines, we must NEVER end the mask mandate. As long as the human race inhabits Earth we must all wear masks and get weekly booster shots. Everyone do your part. Surrender control over your life.

Reply
Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

I admire the people I see alone in a car with their masks on. Without them we would all be goners.

Audrey Shewmaker
0
Audrey Shewmaker

This covid-19 is'nt over by a long shot. People are still getting sick vaccinated or not.

Reply
Wendi Newman
0
Wendi Newman

Mask mandates need to stay in place until we have a vaccine for all age groups and everyone who chooses protection actually has it. Then let the spreaders unmask.

Reply
Becky
0
Becky

Last time we ended the mask mandate too soon and cases went up....give it a little longer.

Reply
Should the state investigate a reporter who exposed a flaw on a government website?

Should the state investigate a reporter who exposed a flaw on a government website?

Yes

8

No

2

Yes

Should the state investigate a reporter who exposed a flaw on a government website?
8 Comments
Justin Ballz
1
Justin Ballz

Reporter broke the law. Reporter must pay the price for being a perpetrator. State must arrest, charge and convict. It's that simple. End of story.

Reply
Max DeYoung
1
Max DeYoung

A responsible person would alert the State to this flaw so it could be corrected without costing money or danger to innocent victims. This so called journalist needs to do some hard jail time.

Reply
Will Mason
1
Will Mason

I voted yes due to the incredibly biased way your question is posed. The question should say " should the state investigate the reporterwho hacked the system." he did not do it to expose flaws. He did it to dig up dirt. Exposing the flaw was a side effect. Not the intent.

Reply
Justin Ballz
Justin Ballz

Yes, reporter is at fault. Must face consequences.

Vernon Taylor
1
Vernon Taylor

Politically motivated and potentially (read most likely) criminal - that is an apt description of the St. Louis Post Disgrace.

Reply
Justin Ballz
Justin Ballz

100% true. Reporter is the perp. Must be arrested, charged and convicted.

No

Should the state investigate a reporter who exposed a flaw on a government website?
2 Comments
Wendi Newman
0
Wendi Newman

The reporter just did their job. Parson just doesn't want to take responsibility.

Reply
Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

If that is true, then the reporter can institute legal proceedings against Parson and get rich, unless the very biased press is not telling the truth. We will see.

Brian Jones
0
Brian Jones

Because the reporter did nothing with the info except report it to the people that needed to fix it. Parsons has no clue of how to run Missouri.

Reply
Mark Werner
Mark Werner @mark
If you're on your bike at night, please wear white
Jeff Rohr
Jeff Rohr @jeff
Chief Square Officer @SquareOffs. Welcome to The Opinion Network.

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT