Should daylight saving time be permanent?
77%
Yes
77%
23%
No
23%
One big argument works against permanent daylight saving time -- more hours of morning darkness. For many parts of the U.S., sunrise would come after 8 a.m. in the winter.
One big argument works against permanent daylight saving time -- more hours of morning darkness. For many parts of the U.S., sunrise would come after 8 a.m. in the winter.
Show Less
4
Comments
Jessica Kuester
I'm the odd one here. in winter months, i like that its darker sooner thats when pretty lights are on the buildings. we enjoy driving around looking at them. Also, we typically aren't outside at night in the winter due to it being so cold.I like it lighter for longer in the warmer months. Swim, ball
Reply Reply
TheRealShyMan
Daylight savings is a silly occurrence that we should not be doing. We seem to use and adjust anything we need to, to fit our means. It's just wrong.
Reply Reply
Chris Hill
sunrise at 8:30 would mean more school bus accidents. People who think this is a good idea would probably vote for a five day weekend as well.
Reply Reply
I think if nothing else just move it 30 minutes and leave it alone
ReplyYes, it is a no brainer, no chance that it will pass the US House of Representatives, let alone the Senate. So that Briben could Veto it.
ReplyBecause I hate it when the sun sets at 5:30.
ReplyI LOVE daylight savings time, and my husband relies on that time in the winter after work to do the farm chores (feeding etc)
Reply