Asked by ABC 17 News 153 Votes Do you have an opinion on the Columbia Board of Education's new public comment policy? 73% Yes Yes 3 27% No No 0 Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Copy Link 73% Yes Add Comment Comment Share with friends 2 Comments 1 Tanner De Rosa Missouri Deserves Better than the Legal MO 22 monopoly! Vote No on Amendment 3!! Reply 1 Amelia Lewis-Allen There should be limits, there is no reason to allow any one person to monopolize the board or attendees attention Reply Max DeYoung We are not talking about the filibuster. Everyone should be able to voice their concerns without being encumbered. 27% No Add Comment Comment Share with friends 0 Comment No one has commented yet
Asked by ABC 17 News 190 Votes Would you drive to another city just to buy gas? 55% Yes, if the math works out Yes, if the math works out 6 45% No, that's too far for me No, that's too far for me 0 Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Copy Link 55% Yes, if the math works out Add Comment Comment Share with friends 6 Comments 3 Eric Smith Already do, and have for years. Reply 2 Susan Woolery I already do. It pays to drive to Boonville when I can get gas for $3.16 at Breaktime vs $3.58 ish in Columbia. Reply 2 Harry D We look at Gas Buddy app and try to get the cheaper gas. Reply 1 Fat Guy Outdoors Do it all the time. Reply 0 Zaos Gonzolez I do. Gas is $0.30 cheaper in Moberly. Reply 0 Max Since, I have a home in the country, I have to drive to a city. Reply 45% No, that's too far for me Add Comment Comment Share with friends 0 Comment No one has commented yet
Asked by ABC 17 News 79 Votes Can Mizzou gymnastics make a run to the NCAA Championship Semifinal? 94% Yes Yes 0 6% No No 0 Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Copy Link 94% Yes Add Comment Comment Share with friends 0 Comment No one has commented yet 6% No Add Comment Comment Share with friends 0 Comment No one has commented yet
Missouri Deserves Better than the Legal MO 22 monopoly! Vote No on Amendment 3!!
ReplyThere should be limits, there is no reason to allow any one person to monopolize the board or attendees attention
Reply