Which Outlet is a Bigger Source of 'Fake News'?
48%
BBC
52%
CNN
WINNER
48%
BBC
52%
CNN
I give the edge to this State-Run and Government Approved media outlet. They don't even try to hide it. Full frontal fake news.
Reply ReplyCNN utilized all of their season long practice on calling for fake fouls, over-reacting & dramatization to persuade the ref's call, paying off the refs for favorable game decisions, etc. CNN gave 200% & used all the 'Tools' in the bag (i.e. Chris Cuomo, Wolf Blitzer, Don Lemon, Jake Tapper) CNN WINS
Reply ReplyVanderbilts, Mossad stooges, Syrian Danny, Fareed the Plagiarist... the all-star team of fake news.
Reply ReplyCNN has managed to make fake news a precipice of its production. Its production, marketing and graphics are second to none in conveying its propaganda of talking heads and talking points. The sheer presence of Anderson Koopa with his hipster glasses seals it.
Reply Reply
Monumentally discredited news source.
Reply9/11 cover-up documentary. Using tax dollars to promote propaganda while pretending to be more independent than commercial outlets. That's even more deceptive.
ReplyThe true masters of fake news, been at it longer than any other fake news outlet, building 7 on 9/11 was just masterful and "saving Syrias Children" propaganda piece was epic in it's fakery. BBC for the win, wooooo!!
ReplyBrussels Broadcasting Corp.Their lies are much subtler than the CNN pantomime and they do it with a seasoned mixture of gravel toned rhetoric and crocodile tears that's taken decades to perfect.
ReplyCan't recall the last time I heard them speak the truth.
ReplyThe "British" "Broadcasting" "Company??" has been spewing from the faucet of misaccuracy for as long as I can remember. Its incredible bias is matched only by its lack of any ethical credulity whatsoever. Since they've been in HD, you can virtually smell the reptilian slime oozing from their "suits"
ReplyCNN probably has greater reach, but the BBCs feat of having the audience pay for the propaganda is outstanding.
Reply