Surveillance SquareOffs
244
9
Should the Columbia City Council buy a license plate reading camera system for the police?
Asked By
ABC 17 News
108
0
Do you support using facial recognition technology to enhance security at airports?
Asked By
News-Press Now
266
6
Do you agree with the Columbia City Council's rejection of the Fusus video system?
Asked By
ABC 17 News
275
6
Are you worried that electronic surveillance is becoming too intrusive?
Asked By
ABC 17 News
296
0
Do you think mass surveillance helps prevent terrorist attacks?
Asked By
William Kern
1,553
43
Should the voting age be lowered to 16?
Asked By
KTVZ
224
4
Have you watched Trump's comments after the White House Correspondents' Dinner?
Asked By
ABC 17 News
265
4
Would You Support Stephen A. Smith For President?
Asked By
TMZ
284
2
Do you think there should be reform for the Department of Homeland Security?
.png?1683934188 "13 On Your Side")
Asked By
13 On Your Side
215
2
Do you think the United States should acquire Greenland?
Asked By
13 On Your Side
444
21
Do you expect violence involving federal agents to continue?
Asked By
ABC 17 News
278
5
Would a four-day school week work with your family's schedule?
Asked By
ABC 17 News
766
19
Do you support the military strikes in Venezuela to apprehend Nicolas Maduro?
Asked By
ABC 17 News
1,509
40
Should driver licenses be offered to non-citizens in the U.S.?
Asked By
KTVZ
48
2
Has your Christmas budget grown or shrunk?
Asked By
News-Press Now
Asked by
Asked by
Yes
0
Comment
No one has commented yet
No
0
Comment
No one has commented yet
Yes
0
Comment
No one has commented yet
No
3
Comments
Frank Jung
These businesses that agree could still turn their video over to police so what's the big deal.
Reply
Max DeYoung
I agree, but the government putting in their own cameras stinks of a Police State. The government could then pick and choose who they want to prosecute. Currently they prosecute, sentence, and then parole, all in one operation. That doesn't curb crime either.
Once_Upon_a_Tiger
Policy doesn't define crime, that's the job of legislature. Businesses set up what level of agreeance they have to law enforcement accessing cameras through FUSUS. Trust comes from the community side as well; stop believing the "police are bogeyman all the time" fairytale.
Reply
Young Paper Chaser
No because if they accepted the Fusus video system, businesses that aren't for it could choose to opt out of the program.
Reply
Young Paper Chaser
The businesses that are for the Fusus video system would not have to worry if the accepted the Fusus video system
Trending
Who to Follow
About Surveillance
Debates and polls on Surveillance from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.
Become a Partner
📱 Download the App: iOS
Support Publishers About Blog Shop Facebook Twitter Instagram Privacy Terms Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information Community Guidelines © 2025 SquareOffs Social Polling Platform
And then aggressively prosecute the offenders. Like that will ever happen.
Reply