Supreme court SquareOffs
333
6
Should the Supreme Court intervene in President-elect Donald Trump's New York sentencing?
Asked By
ABC 17 News
224
3
Did the Supreme Court's ruling on presidential immunity surprise you?
Asked By
ABC 17 News
187
0
Do you agree with the U.S. Supreme Court decision on mifepristone?
Asked By
ABC 17 News
393
8
Did the Supreme Court rule fairly in the Colorado ballot case?
Asked By
ABC 17 News
253
2
Should mifepristone be available by mail?
Asked By
ABC 17 News
1,011
10
Are you happy with the Supreme Court's decision on student loan debt forgiveness?
Asked By
ABC 17 News
327
9
Do you agree with the Supreme Court's decision to strike down affirmative action in colleges?
Asked By
ABC 17 News
841
21
Do you support student loan forgiveness?
Asked By
ABC 17 News
765
38
Was the Supreme Court right to overturn Roe v. Wade?
Asked By
ABC 17 News
545
27
Are you happy to see Ketanji Brown Jackson be confirmed to the Supreme Court?
Asked By
ABC 17 News
609
8
Do you agree with the Supreme Court's ruling on vaccine mandates?
Asked By
ABC 17 News
269
5
Should seats be added to the U.S. Supreme Court?
Asked By
ABC 17 News
129
3
Should religious organizations be exempt from coronavirus restrictions?
Asked By
ABC 17 News
1,553
43
Should the voting age be lowered to 16?
Asked By
KTVZ
224
4
Have you watched Trump's comments after the White House Correspondents' Dinner?
Asked By
ABC 17 News
YES
She took a stand, despite the political consequences.
She took a stand, despite the political consequences.
Show Less
2
Comments
The Whittakers
She is standing up for the United States Constitution in a nonpartisan manner in spite of personal attacks. She recognizes the very future of our country is uncertain in the current divisiveness.
Reply
Patricia Bond
She admits to the criminality of #45 and is fighting to turn her party away from #45's destructiveness.
ReplyNO
I don't agree with her vocal stance on the Jan. 6 commission.
I don't agree with her vocal stance on the Jan. 6 commission.
Show Less
2
Comments
Carol Martin
I don't agree with the whole January 6th committee. It's a waste if time and taxpayers monies. This has been going on way too long. It is so biased as to be putrid.
Reply
Asked by
Yes
3
Comments
fred raithel
Supporting the transition is not immediately profitable. Therefore, government has to provide the initial seed money. It's like the space program.
ReplyNo
3
Comments
Randel Hearne
Just drives the price up on the product. Look at the price increase on the 2023 Ford Lightning Pro.
Reply
Lisa Howard Glass
If it's going to work, let it happen naturally. We cannot FORCE a transition to anything, especially with politicians getting kickbacks from their "green" donors. And a lot of these "green" energy sources aren't that reliable anyway.
Reply
Trending
Who to Follow
.png?1683934188 "13 On Your Side")
About Supreme court
Debates and polls on Supreme court from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.
Become a Partner
📱 Download the App: iOS
Support Publishers About Blog Shop Facebook Twitter Instagram Privacy Terms Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information Community Guidelines © 2025 SquareOffs Social Polling Platform
Indefensible for the former president to hold onto documents that are government property and contain sensitive national security information
ReplyA few months ago there were 15 boxes returned from there, they knew there was more. They asked for them, he did not comply. They were just taking back what he stole.
ReplyThere was a judge-approved warrant, his attorneys were present, and they were notified in advance after a subpoena was issued months before and ignored. It was not a raid, no one broke down any doors, and there were clearly urgent reasons to move forward even if they cannot be disclosed.
ReplyEveryone should be accountable for their actions. Trump appointed FBI head and judges authorized the search. Previous formal requests had been ignored.
Reply