Second amendment SquareOffs

Yes

2

No

18

Yes

2 Comments
Latterdaysaint
0
Latterdaysaint

Charlie Kirk was a great guy

Reply
LuLyn Howard
0
LuLyn Howard

Charlie Kirk was a man of faith and gave his very life for the values I stand for. He was a voice heard around the world

Reply

No

18 Comments
Pat Nelson Wilson
2
Pat Nelson Wilson

He doesn’t deserve it. He is a nobody and spewed hateful rhetoric.

Reply
Janice Adair
2
Janice Adair

He was a racist, white supremacist, and very divisive figure. The political violence that ended his lift is a terrible thing but it’s something he helped foment. This is the most ridiculous idea I can imagine.

Reply
Lisa Alexander
2
Lisa Alexander

He was a racist person who spread hate.

Reply
Jim Terry
1
Jim Terry

Need I really explain

Reply
Jane CommunityMember
1
Jane CommunityMember

I never heard of this guy before he was murdered, but it looks like he had a track record of saying awful things, and fomented the conditions in society that led to his demise. That's very tragic, but there are other people more deserving of a day.

Reply
Gary Mann
0
Gary Mann

Although his murder was sad and despicable, Kirk was a hateful person. He was a misogynist, xenophobe, homophobe, racist and white nationalist who taught hate and division. His beliefs were not Christian.

Reply
Robert Spaet
0
Robert Spaet

Irony: “It's worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year, so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights…” Charlie Kirk 2023

Reply
k san
0
k san

Absolutely NOT!! He was a racist extraordinaire and spread divisive speech and ideas.

Reply
Byron Barclay
0
Byron Barclay

Because his MO is actually deceptive & decisive!

Reply
Martie King
0
Martie King

He is not a hero.

Reply
Linda Spaet
0
Linda Spaet

Though this is a tragic incident and a terrible time of violence in our country, Mr. Kirk was not an elected official. We should honor his family and respect them in many ways and I certainly have sympathy for his family. But this does not warrant aday in Oregon devoted to his name or his politics.

Reply
Robert Spaet
0
Robert Spaet

A highly partisan figure in American politics should never be given a day of observance for any reason. It should be acknowledge that violence is not acceptable in any form for any reason, but it should not be honored and given Publicity because of it.

Reply
Alex GERRITY
0
Alex GERRITY

He was not a government figure, and while I don’t condone the violence that took his life, he called on his supporters to bail out others that committed violence against elected government officials.

Reply
Laurie Maholland
0
Laurie Maholland

Mr. Kirk was too controversial and not a hero.

Reply
celeste carico
0
celeste carico

This guy was homophobic, racist, and anti women’s rights. While I think his murder is wrong, he is not a hero. He encouraged hatred towards people he didn’t agree with their lifestyles in his “teachings”. I don’t think Jesus would support him…he preached love for everyone!

Reply
Gerald Wonnacott
0
Gerald Wonnacott

We didn't create a Melissa Hortmann day and she was a good person. Charlie Kirk's rhetoric was about racism, sexism, mysoginism, and divisiveness. He was not a good person and represented everything that was NOT Christian.

Reply
Shannon Gamble
0
Shannon Gamble

Sure! Let's give kudos to the shooter! NOT! What about the 5 officers who just got shot in Pennsylvania? Should we have a day for that too?? Absolutely NOT necessary.

Reply

Yes

3

No

4

Yes

2 Comments
Fat Guy Outdoors
0
Fat Guy Outdoors

Less Dems the better.

Reply

No

4 Comments
Paula Garrett
1
Paula Garrett

Not only do I not like this map, I don't like the way they split Boone County in half last time either. Kehoe is wrong. Nothing this legislature does represents me and my values.

Reply
Larry Berneking
1
Larry Berneking

Don’t like politicians pushing the constitution aside to further their Trump led political agenda!

Reply
Sara Kalinowski
Sara Kalinowski

Me neither. How are they not embarrassed?

Kathryn Stayton
0
Kathryn Stayton

Gerrymandering is used by a party that is aware they would lose if they are in a fair election. It is a tactic used by losers who will do anything to keep power. Little man syndrome in a way. Pathetic and embarrassing and won’t work in

Reply
Toasty
0
Toasty

This seems like a political form of "bike shedding". Instead of focusing on important conservative legislation, lets move around lines on a map and pretend it makes some kind of improvement in Missourian's lives.

Reply

Yes

3

No

0

Yes

3 Comments
Gary Mann
0
Gary Mann

Reasonable regulations could keep at least some felons, mentally challenged and untrained from possessing guns. Universal background checks and red flag laws would help. My last two background checks took just 15 and 5 minutes to complete. Only criminals need to fear background checks.

Reply
Benjamin Phillips IV
0
Benjamin Phillips IV

Just look at the rising deaths. Its like the old west. Who has the biggest gun and has no problem in using it.

Reply
John Sunde
0
John Sunde

Guns are in to many hands and places.

Reply

No

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

About Second amendment

Debates and polls on Second amendment from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT