Who's side are you on in Scarlett Johannsson's lawsuit against Disney about Black Widow streaming?

Who's side are you on in Scarlett Johannsson's lawsuit against Disney about Black Widow streaming?

Scarlett

70

Disney

2

Scarlett

67 Comments
Brian Klein
7
Brian Klein

It's my understanding that her pay was based on ticket sales, so if she feels shorted due to people streaming vs. going into the theater, Disney should pony up some money for her.

Reply
Fiorella
4
Fiorella

She has the right to get that money and Disney broke a pretty strong bond between them

Reply
madison taylor
3
madison taylor

Scarlett was totally underpaid for the movie. Her acting was amazing, and she played the role perfectly. Disney did not pay her fairly, especially because this was her sendoff from Marvel.

Reply
Tyler Kupfer
2
Tyler Kupfer

Disney took advantage of their actors through a minor loophole in the contract (the success of Disney+ had not been anticipated when the contract was signed), and if the real reason that Black Widow was on Disney+ early was COVID then it would have cost the same as theater tickets, not 3x more.

Reply
Juan Hernandez
1
Juan Hernandez

I believe she’s worked hard and deserves a good pay

Reply
Gagnon Fabien
Gagnon Fabien

yes, She's

Rosalie Hetrick
1
Rosalie Hetrick

For me it's not about the money. It's about disney breaking her contract. I feel that she's sueing because she's so big she can totally afford it but the smaller actors and actresses can't. I think she's doing it so they can't get away with doing it to smaller people.

Reply
Pamela S
1
Pamela S

Because they screwed her by releasing it that way. Theaters first, let it run, then tv. It's the way it's always been done, except when you're trying to screw over your top talent.

Reply
DNDNFNDSNNSKSK
1
DNDNFNDSNNSKSK

because it wasn’t in her contract and she lost like 50 mil or something from them premiering it on Disney plus at the same time as in theaters. Plus she waited over a decade for her characters movie just for some shitty stuff like this to happen. I’m 100% on scarletts side no doubt.

Reply
Max
0
Max

Disney is evil child groomers.

Reply
Ruby I. Hadani
0
Ruby I. Hadani

There’s lots of stars that Disney has done this to

Reply
Meriyen Guerra
0
Meriyen Guerra

The breach of the contract and they must pay her. Plus, this wouldn't be an issue if she were a man!

Reply
oddboy77
0
oddboy77

because these people aren't getting what they deserve for these roles not even the behind the scenes people

Reply
Calvin Broadus
0
Calvin Broadus

Disney knows they handled this wrong

Reply
Jasmine Cephas LuthorLaufeyson
0
Jasmine Cephas LuthorLaufeyson

They didnt give her money for a movie she has been with for 12 years and let's act like disney isnt known for doing this a lot or stealing from smaller corporations

Reply
William Lloyd Scott
0
William Lloyd Scott

Think David v' Goliath,...actors within a mega franchise as Marvel, regardless of theater door ticket sales still need to get paid amicably....DO THE RIGHT THING!!!! Karma is a bitch!

Reply
Alejandro Bustamante
0
Alejandro Bustamante

Team Scarlett because she got under paid, breached contract, and lots of people don’t like black widow. But I’m here to say I am a black widow fan I like her and she sacrificed herself to save half the universe. And did not even get a funeral scene in endgame. How disappointing

Reply
CobraKai1972
0
CobraKai1972

Cause she’s my wife

Reply
Laci_LuLu
0
Laci_LuLu

ScarJo was screwed over. She deserves as much respect and money as the male Avengers did. Not her fault a pandemic hit.

Reply
Anna Meyer
0
Anna Meyer

Because she’s has the right and they should have talked to her about their idea but Disney was a little right but Scarlett.

Reply
spider man
0
spider man

Disney is a huge company who abuses their workers and is trying to monopolize the film industry, I will never be on their side. Also, IATSE is going on strike right now against streaming services, it’s a problem in the industry in general. Johansson is in the right.

Reply
Toni Faith
0
Toni Faith

First off, she gave them the option the redeem themselves and keep it silent. She just wanted her rightful earnings. But NO INSTEAD Disney decided to just push it off as if a women as powerful as her wouldn’t come back at them. 60 million is NOTHING to Disney. And you guys couldn’t? Shame.

Reply
Michael Martinez
0
Michael Martinez

Disney didn’t specify that the movie would premiere simultaneously on streaming, thereby severely limiting the box office draw

Reply
Scott Farmer
0
Scott Farmer

Because Disney needs to be brought down some. They cheated Scarlett and she deserves the money.

Reply
Domonique Jackson
0
Domonique Jackson

Disney went against her contract and made her loose millions and got mad at her for getting mad at loosing money and decided to ban her from future projects

Reply
izzy scienski
0
izzy scienski

She has the right to get that money and Disney broke a pretty strong bond between them

Reply
Robert Zavala
0
Robert Zavala

Disney back-doored her by releasing it on demand due to Covid and not giving her a percentage. Should have cut her in or delayed the release as Tom Cruise did with his last 2 movies.

Reply
Ray Plasse
0
Ray Plasse

Because the studios have consistently tried to screw all their employees. Only a union can stop the abuse.

Reply
Dangle Durand
0
Dangle Durand

As a few have said, if her contract was to include ticket sales and Disney decided to stream it for extra cash, theg owe her some of that income too

Reply
Sophie Lee
0
Sophie Lee

it’s simple they breeches her contract there is no two ways around it

Reply
matt gee
0
matt gee

Well look at Shang chi? Lesser movie that is killing it because they didn’t stream it

Reply
Jeffrey Hartzell
0
Jeffrey Hartzell

Disney breached contract, period.

Reply
illuminatedi
0
illuminatedi

i vouch for scarlett, shes dedicated 10+ years building this hero, disney will make trillions in the coming decades which she helped with some millions, she's no different than the other amazing cast members, she should be treated equally.

Reply
Lauren Cook
0
Lauren Cook

They broke a contract regardless if she’s rich or not they screwed her out of a shit ton of money.

Reply
Alyssa Calfee
0
Alyssa Calfee

Her pay was based on ticket sale and disney+ shorten it without consent.

Reply
A Norfleet
0
A Norfleet

Because the broke the contract and she was the executive producer for that film which mean she put in her own money to see the project through, only for her to cheat her out of her money.!

Reply
Tai Allen
0
Tai Allen

They should have asked for her approval.

Reply
Peter Rapiejko
0
Peter Rapiejko

Disney did not keep to their end of the contract! Therefore, any lawyer or judge would agree that Scarlett Johansson deserves to win this case!

Reply
Juan Carlos Garcia
0
Juan Carlos Garcia

I dislike big corporation's that bullies women and don't give credit or take advantage of women who they employ basically those who think that having power and wealth can abuse others and mistreat them she's an amazing actress and a wonderful human being love her

Reply
Matthew J Opdyke | Sci-Fi & Fantasy Author
0
Matthew J Opdyke | Sci-Fi & Fantasy Author

In an environment where COVID is a concern for people at high-risk, it would make sense for Disney to generously pay Scarlett for streaming revenues. She upped Marvel value by billions and was very dedicated every step of the way. Common Disney, show a little heart.

Reply
Michelle
0
Michelle

They could have done exactly what they are doing for Shang Chi or renegotiated the contract. Instead, her reps were stonewalled, the box office tanked due to pirating, and she lost a fortune. Also, it's a known fact that China will not show movies from other countries in July.

Reply
Kyle King
0
Kyle King

Disney should have included streaming in her cut. The should of updated her contract before they released. Disney has a long history of doing people wrong.

Reply
Londyn Wilkerson
0
Londyn Wilkerson

Because they had no right to do what they did she deserves everything 😀

Reply
Kathy Phillips
0
Kathy Phillips

Pay artists for their work.

Reply
Alessio Pasquali
0
Alessio Pasquali

I want theatrical windows to be what Disney goes back to moving forward.

Reply
Rebecca Lanfrit
0
Rebecca Lanfrit

Movie should’nt have been streamed while in theaters!!

Reply
ꜱᴛᴇꜰᴀɴɴʏ ʟᴇᴜɴɢ ʏᴜ
0
ꜱᴛᴇꜰᴀɴɴʏ ʟᴇᴜɴɢ ʏᴜ

Violating the contract is against the law. Under the law, once a contract is breached, the guilty party, Disney, must remedy the breach.

Reply
Corey Wilson
0
Corey Wilson

Because they broke the contract rules about her movie not being on Disney+

Reply
Amanda Allen
0
Amanda Allen

They had a contract, it was for theatrical release and that's their base pay. Not just hers they've to pay EVERYONE involved in the movie and making of the movie. By releasing to Disney premiere they lost what they earned. Disney should fork over profits Disney should wait a mont to release any film

Reply
Maggie Y
0
Maggie Y

Honestly it's more the principle than the money. Disney is trying to portray her as money-hungry when in fact the opposite is true. Disney is being a bully.

Reply
Dw Ads
0
Dw Ads

Disney needs to remember who & how they got to where they are at. W/O these people, they have a challenging product. Plus, a contract is only as good as it is honored by both parties. Disney has not lived up to their end of the contract but belittling Scarlett & saying it is because of COVID-19 😔

Reply
JC Satterwhite
0
JC Satterwhite

Because they are contractually obligated to stick with the agreement stated. Period

Reply
xMarvel Fanx
0
xMarvel Fanx

They had an agreement about what was supposed to happen and Disney didn’t hold up their end of the deal- Scarlett deserves the money

Reply
Pam Saxton
0
Pam Saxton

Disney broke their contract with her and cost the entire cast lots of income and they refused to renegotiate. Disney took advantage of the covid situation unfairly.

Reply
Grace Stephens
0
Grace Stephens

She deserves the money 💯 percent and I think it’s absolutely outrageous that Disney isn’t paying her the amount she requires. It’s disgusting how Disney treats women and I think she hasn’t gotten enough credit for her incredibly amazing acting skills and she’s just awesome! SHE DESERVES THE MONEY!

Reply
N
0
N

It was in her contracts that the movie would have only a theatrical release. Disney didn’t honor that so she has the right to sue. Not to mention how poorly Disney has been treating this whole thing. Scarlett’s in the right.

Reply
Victor Acosta
0
Victor Acosta

Disney is evil incarnate

Reply
EJ Manalo
0
EJ Manalo

It’s her right to file a lawsuit against Disney and all. Sure, the new movie, “Black Widow” wasn’t as successful as you guys think it is, but it is a good movie! Scarlett Johansson deserves better, and we’ll always be there for her and to support her throughout her journey! Best of luck to Scarlett!

Reply
Lionel Walker
0
Lionel Walker

I respect SJ because she's a powerful woman figure. All those fake Disney Princess skanks get way more respect and aren't even real

Reply
Loki Odinson
0
Loki Odinson

Disney straight up lied & breached the Contract they made with her.When they released BW on Disney+!!!

Reply
Inester Dawson
0
Inester Dawson

Disney don't know how to work on marvel movies they messing them up thats why sonys don't want to do another spider-man movie with them hobos they should stick to they're own tv shows and movies of there own stop messing with Scarlett Johansson Disney matafact marvel stop dealing with Disney they su

Reply
Inester Dawson
Inester Dawson

Sorry about the su i meant stop it Disney and stop making marvel movies i meant

Demond Nelson Hooper
0
Demond Nelson Hooper

She made her character in the marvel movies

Reply
jamez Senese
0
jamez Senese

If it was a man they would get paid in full amount

Reply
Cyndy Sandoval
0
Cyndy Sandoval

Because disney did her wrong.

Reply
Kayla Woods
0
Kayla Woods

I voted for Scarlett because, it’s her own movie thats about her, especially since she’s not getting paid enough, and since Disney+ released it, she won’t make as much, because when people go to the cinemas to see the movie she would make more in box office.

Reply
Patrick Stewart
0
Patrick Stewart

Legal precedent has already been set with Gal Godot and others where contracts were correctly and ethically updated to increase their income due to lost ticket sales vs simultaneous streaming. Disney didn’t even try to renegotiate in good faith. ScarJo income was based of ticket sales. Hope she wins

Reply
Waira
0
Waira

I feel like a large condition of her being willing to costar in so many films was that she would eventually get a standalone film and be able to reap the benefits of the box office as a lead. I hope she gets what she deserves.

Reply

Disney

2 Comments
Trevor Thomas
0
Trevor Thomas

I choose Disney because people at home who are positive of Covid-19 and they can't go anywhere and movie theater for two weeks. Kevin Feige and Scarlett Johansson are a big mistake and they haven't thought about other people who are stayed at home from positive Covid-19 in two weeks.

Reply
Sofia
Sofia

She was suppose to get paid for the movie on Disney+ but did not.

Erin Reilly
0
Erin Reilly

Because I love Disney

Reply
Do you spend more hours a week watching traditional entertainment or user generated content?

Do you spend more hours a week watching traditional entertainment or user generated content?

Youtube/Twitch etc

5

Movies, television etc

1

Youtube/Twitch etc

5 Comments
Larry Ewart
0
Larry Ewart

Switched to YouTube from Cable like it so much better because of what we normally watch is programmed for us.

Reply
Adam Nixon
0
Adam Nixon

I'd say it's like 60/40 in favor of things like user generated content, but it has more to do with time than anything else. Due to things like work and chores, I just don't have time during the day for movies/TV. But for a few hours in the evening, I tend to watch more movies/TV, which I prefer.

Reply
Andrew Cozzini
0
Andrew Cozzini

This is one of those where I'm voting the honest truth, even though I'd prefer it be the other (while still making time for Geekvolution, of course). I think it's because of how casually I can spend hours on YouTube, as opposed to being intentional about catching up on content I intend to consume.

Reply
Mutale Mwananshiku
0
Mutale Mwananshiku

They are movies and shows i want to watch but am more focused on youtube.

Reply

Movies, television etc

1 Comment
ANY Triangle
0
ANY Triangle

movies and tels are nostalgic

Reply
Is someone who lets their pet off-leash in restricted areas considered a 'bad pet owner?'
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
807 Votes

Is someone who lets their pet off-leash in restricted areas considered a 'bad pet owner?'

Yes

6

No

5

Yes

6 Comments
Kristi Murdock
1
Kristi Murdock

Even a friendly dog with excellent recall can cause real problems for the owner walking their reactive dog on leash; a dog running free is highly exciting to other dogs; it's not fair for the owner of the reactive dog to have to deal with that overstimulation in a "leash only" area.

Reply
robert weber
robert weber

I recently I commented that it is not fair. But your comment makes me feel incorrect. I have had a reactive dog before and I feel that your comment is valid.

Kati Magana
0
Kati Magana

If it is a law and you break it regardless of what it refers to that is breaking the law- which by definition is criminal. If you put your pet in a situation that is unsafe that is your responsibility and ergo you are a bad pet owner. Pets are like our kids, it's our job to keep them safe.

Reply
Kim Ritchie
0
Kim Ritchie

yes because they are putting their dog as well as people with leashed pets at risk. Not all dogs like other dogs and not all people are comfortable with strange dogs running up to them.

Reply
Ann Thomas
0
Ann Thomas

There are laws and rules for a reason. No one should think that laws and rules don't apply to them. If they want their dog off leash then go out in the woods where no one else is or to a fenced dog park.

Reply
Deborah Albright
0
Deborah Albright

BECAUSE most dog owners that do this have zero respect for others or property.. NEVER pick up poop and feel entitled

Reply
Nic Secor
0
Nic Secor

There are leash laws for good reason. On a side note Bend Parks and Recreation need to put up signs at dog parks reminding owners that they are liable for damages their dogs cause to other dogs or humans under Oregon law. Bend PD treat dog parks like they are outside of their jurisdiction.

Reply

No

4 Comments
Amanda Jones
1
Amanda Jones

A bad dog owner is someone who is not able to care of the animal or mistreats the animal. The person is just not considerate of others and will break the law for whatever reason they may have. *if you have an aggressive dog it is the OWNERS responsibility to keep the dog under control anywhere

Reply
Payton Dixson
1
Payton Dixson

There are many factors, if your dog has great recall and obeys to stay in a heal being off leash is fine as the dog is still in verbal control. Dogs that do not listen should not be off leash.

Reply
k san
0
k san

No, that's too big a generalization. However, those owners should never let their pet off-leash in those areas.

Reply
robert weber
0
robert weber

Maybe there pet is trusted and not reactive. Why does a none relative happy pet need to be restricted?

Reply
Who to Follow
KTVZ
HighQ

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT