Should the U.S. open the strategic oil reserves to lower gas prices?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
765 Votes

Should the U.S. open the strategic oil reserves to lower gas prices?

Yes!

14

No!

17

Yes!

10 Comments
Gabe West
1
Gabe West

Biden needs to open the keystone pipeline and resume oil exploration

Reply
Paul Owen
1
Paul Owen

The strategic oil reserves are for times like this. We should also keep an eye on the oil companies and make sure they are not making extreme profits off the backs of the American citizens. After all that petroleum is being pumped from American taxpayers land that has been leased to these oil co.

Reply
Rick Allen
Rick Allen

Brandon casue that by starting a war with big oil the first day, PERIOD!!!

Robert Northrup
Robert Northrup

Don't be foolish the reserves are there for time of war.

Greg Moore
Greg Moore

No, the reserve is not for time like this, it is for times when we don't have oil available. We do have oil available now, and a LOT of oil available. It is just that Biden (and pseudo-environmentalists) don't want us to use it.

Gabe West
Gabe West

Biden needs to resume oil exploration and open the keystone pipeline

Pam W
0
Pam W

Hell yes. It is a no brainer, which our pres does not have.

Reply
Tim Collins
0
Tim Collins

we should open most everything and the pipeline.... Sure tired of people jacking up prices on us little guys. and want us to donate at the same time. If Biden wants GREEN then provide it to use and we will use the CHEAPEST!!! Its not rocket science.

Reply
Kevin Crabtree
0
Kevin Crabtree

Yes but this is just the beginning Drill Pump stop all taxing and restrictions set up by government what do we need reserves for if we are not going to actually help in Ukraine

Reply
Diane Stewart
0
Diane Stewart

Open up the pipeline and create more jobs

Reply
Louis Vaday
0
Louis Vaday

This is just ludicrous. We have the largest oil fields in the world, yet since Biden took over, we are now again dependent on world oil prices instead of our own. We wouldn't have to touch our reserves and still have cheap gas and oil. But Forrest Gump said it best " stupid is what stupid does!"

Reply
Nik Myles
0
Nik Myles

The US shouldn't be relying on foreign sources of energy when we have more than enough to be energy independent again. We were energy independent just over one year ago. But that ended on day one of this administration.

Reply
Steven Huillet
0
Steven Huillet

Absolutely! Prices are way too high! Just another attempt of oil companies taking advantage of a big situation like in the 1970's.

Reply
Robert Northrup
Robert Northrup

Perhaps this is the plan. Raise the price of gas so they can justify using our reserves and leave us at the mercy of our enemies.

Greg Moore
Greg Moore

Explain why oil companies would not provide as much oil as possible at a time when prices are sky high. No, the prices are high due to speculation of shortage, given Biden's refusal to open up the spigot (the oil leases he claimed unused are not proven, exploration still necessary. ANWAR is KNOWN

Gabe West
Gabe West

Bide the keystone pipeline and resume oil exploration

Loretta Jones
0
Loretta Jones

Price is getting ridiculous. Average working person can't afford commuting to and from work.

Reply
Gabe West
Gabe West

Biden needs to resume oil exploration and the keystone pipeline

No!

12 Comments
David Tucker
3
David Tucker

Absolutely not. Oil prices (and therefore gas prices) would drop dramatically if Congress would just reverse the disastrous executive orders Biden has put into effect restricting U.S. oil production.

Reply
Kenneth Emmrich
2
Kenneth Emmrich

There is not enough in storage to make a difference in the supply but for a few days. It is more of a political gesture than problem solving measure.

Reply
Ben Hargis
2
Ben Hargis

Don't waste the reserves......open the keyst one pipeline, increase production and exploration in the West

Reply
Matt Cyrus
2
Matt Cyrus

We may need our reserves for war before this is over. Increase supply and lower costs by reversing Biden's orders and policies. https://americansforprosperity.org/biden-policies-raising-gas-prices/?fbclid=IwAR3jOvKpxrWnyT1iz2JrBflODu-aV7aHZdj_B4JgTndUI-8XFvAwXp3M1Jw

Reply
Robert Northrup
1
Robert Northrup

Our enemies would love to see us use our reserves. They are there to be used in case of war. Our current government is working for the globalists not for you and I.

Reply
Greg Moore
1
Greg Moore

Why tap into a reserve that is meant for when Oil is unavailable? We have plenty of oil available, it is just that irrational environmentalists don't want us to use it: https://www.realclearenergy.org/articles/2022/03/07/greenpeace_environmentalism_allowed_putin_to_invade_ukraine_820399.html

Reply
John Philo
1
John Philo

OPEN THE KEYSTONE PIPELINE!

Reply
Dieter Heinzer
0
Dieter Heinzer

Build the freak'n pipeline and resume US oil drilling!!!!!!!

Reply
Tim Collins
0
Tim Collins

This is not a emergency! It's a idiot in office fault.... and was ELECTED. But Not by me.

Reply
Rick Allen
0
Rick Allen

No, that is absurd and would NOT help! We need to undo everything Brandon did his first day in office declaring war on big oil! We need oil Independence for the security of this nation! Brandons horrible weakness has weakened the U S and hurt the whole world, emboldening Putin.

Reply
Rob Mozz
0
Rob Mozz

Definitely no, all we have to do is go back to the way the Trump Administration was handling energy. We were energy independent people!

Reply
Dave Voiles
0
Dave Voiles

Using those reserves is virtue signaling. The amount they released last time didn't make a dent in the cost. Those reserves are for military use. If this admin hadn't screwed it up we would still be energy independent like we were with the previous admin. We wouldn't be having the conversation.

Reply
Would you rather see Tim Burton make a new Batman movie or Sam Raimi make a new Spider-Man movie?

Would you rather see Tim Burton make a new Batman movie or Sam Raimi make a new Spider-Man movie?

Burton Batman

0

Raimi Spider-Man

11

Burton Batman

0 Comment
No one has commented yet

Raimi Spider-Man

11 Comments
Benjamin Szczegolski-Jacobs
1
Benjamin Szczegolski-Jacobs

I like Raimi as a director more and frankly seeing the first draught of the 89 script makes me like Burton even less. Havent ever really loved 89 as much as others to begin with, sonce I didnt grow up with it.

Reply
Mutale Mwananshiku
1
Mutale Mwananshiku

Raimi cause at least he loves spider-man and would try to make a character driven story about peter , whereas burton doesnt care for batman and another batman film by him would be all visuals and not a character driven story about batman.

Reply
Andrew Cozzini
1
Andrew Cozzini

Burton Batman, while still a notable and fondly remembered version, is (imo) seeming less influential and culturally relevant the more years that have passed since its release. Conversely, Sam Raimi's Spider-Man seems way more influential again, and is, for me, the more definitive take of the two!

Reply
Spencer Nielsen
1
Spencer Nielsen

Easy! Burton has yet to make a good Batman movie, Raimi made two great films with Spider-Man.

Reply
rockmanlp
0
rockmanlp

Burton is much less talented

Reply
Smol-Vampire
0
Smol-Vampire

I want Raimi to redeem himself for the biggest let down

Reply
Jay-El Lewis
0
Jay-El Lewis

While I enjoyed both Sam just had more films, Norton only had that one Batman film with Michael Keaton

Reply
Robert Wild
0
Robert Wild

The Raimi Spider-man films feel like an overarching story without a satisfying ending. I just have more nostalgia for Raimi Spider-man. Literally nothing would make me happier than hearing that elfman spider-man score over the opening credits of a new Raimi Spider-man movie one more time.

Reply
Chewbaacca's Lover
0
Chewbaacca's Lover

It would be a harder choice if it was the Keaton universe without Burton, even than I might have to go with Spider Man, Raimi is the easy choice with Burton the way he is now.

Reply
SpedeVesku
0
SpedeVesku

Burton's best days are behind him and even during those he wasn't perfect. Raimi still seems to "got it", even if I haven't loved all of his more recent work either. Plus, his Spider-Man movies ended on a worse note than Burton's Batmans, so there's a bigger need for redemption.

Reply
Jedi Knight
0
Jedi Knight

Now I assume that both Tim Burton and Sam Raimi are very different people than when they left their projects, but since there's been less time in between 2007 and now than there is 1992 and now, I assume that Raimi has retained more of his sensibilities that made his version work.

Reply
Should President Trump continue to pursue a United States takeover of Greenland?

Should President Trump continue to pursue a United States takeover of Greenland?

Yes

10

No

7

Yes

3 Comments
Vanessa Vaughan
0
Vanessa Vaughan

I ignored it just like Republican lawmakers ignore takkng a bigger stance on control on school shootings. All they do is give meaningless mouth service the whole time pocketing money from NRA lobbyists. I don't want to take anyone's guns from them, but our children should feel safe.

Reply
Felicia Megan
0
Felicia Megan

He needs to chill.

Reply
Max
0
Max

Trump got the deal today January 21st.. Trump helps Americans again. Daily.

Reply
Max
Max

Fred, keep reading CNN. LOL

Fred
Fred

There are two ways to be fooled: One is to believe what isn't true, and the other is to refuse to believe what is true. ― Soren Kierkegaard

No

6 Comments
Nancy Sims-VanBuren
1
Nancy Sims-VanBuren

He has us at odds with our allies, our adversaries and within our own nation due to the extreme violence with the ICE issue... civil unrest...

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

Steven Watson
1
Steven Watson

He is completely insane. He and his cabinet want the natural resources, like Venezuela oil!!!

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

Bryan Jones
1
Bryan Jones

We already have a military presence in Greenland. Denmark is a NATO ally. Trump should NOT be threatening the European balance or the time-tested established order. This has ramifications far beyond Trump's ego.

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

0571953
1
0571953

US should not invade other countries. Never Greenland or Venezuela. This is Trump enriching himself. Dangerous and destroying US reputation on human rights.

Reply
Max
Max

He didn't invade them.

Denzel McVeigh
1
Denzel McVeigh

You don't own this country and you can't own Greenland matter of fact go away you prick

Reply
Max
Max

Wrong again.

Kevin Blount
1
Kevin Blount

We have existing agreements with Greenland and Denmark regarding military bases. We should expand on that, rather than threaten to take the entire country by force 'if necessary'

Reply
Max
Max

Trump made a deal that everyone loves. All over the EU.

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT