Mexico SquareOffs

Do you think the U.S. should help Mexico in dealing with unrest in the country?
181 3
Do you think the U.S. should help Mexico in dealing with unrest in the country?
13 On Your Side
Asked By
13 On Your Side
Do you think the U.S.-Mexico trade deal will be beneficial for Americans?
90 0
Do you think the U.S.-Mexico trade deal will be beneficial for Americans?
13 On Your Side
Asked By
13 On Your Side
Do you trust Trump on tariffs?
440 9
Do you trust Trump on tariffs?
ABC 17 News
Asked By
ABC 17 News
Do you think the Mexican National Guard will help aid border security?
206 0
Do you think the Mexican National Guard will help aid border security?
13 On Your Side
Asked By
13 On Your Side
Are you worried about the economic consequences of tariffs?
387 7
Are you worried about the economic consequences of tariffs?
ABC 17 News
Asked By
ABC 17 News
Do you think the Mexican army should remain in charge of public safety in San Luis?
57 0
Do you think the Mexican army should remain in charge of public safety in San Luis?
13 On Your Side
Asked By
13 On Your Side
Is a deal with Mexico key to preventing illicit fentanyl trafficking into the U.S.?
59 1
Is a deal with Mexico key to preventing illicit fentanyl trafficking into the U.S.?
News-Press Now
Asked By
News-Press Now
Do you believe the barrier built in the Rio Grande River in Texas will slow down migrant crossings?
148 1
Do you believe the barrier built in the Rio Grande River in Texas will slow down migrant crossings?
13 On Your Side
Asked By
13 On Your Side
Do you think the current number of entry lines in and out of Mexico is enough?
126 0
Do you think the current number of entry lines in and out of Mexico is enough?
13 On Your Side
Asked By
13 On Your Side
Do you celebrate Cinco de Mayo?
208 1
Do you celebrate Cinco de Mayo?
ABC 17 News
Asked By
ABC 17 News
Do you think the border's security and humanitarian crisis will worsen after Title 42 ends?
132 0
Do you think the border's security and humanitarian crisis will worsen after Title 42 ends?
13 On Your Side
Asked By
13 On Your Side
Are you concerned traveling to Mexico?
214 1
Are you concerned traveling to Mexico?
13 On Your Side
Asked By
13 On Your Side
Do you think the House Judiciary Committee hearing will ease the border crisis?
122 0
Do you think the House Judiciary Committee hearing will ease the border crisis?
13 On Your Side
Asked By
13 On Your Side
Does the cloned Border Patrol vehicle raise your concerns over border security?
122 0
Does the cloned Border Patrol vehicle raise your concerns over border security?
13 On Your Side
Asked By
13 On Your Side
Are you celebrating Hispanic Heritage Month?
66 1
Are you celebrating Hispanic Heritage Month?
KESQ News Channel 3
Asked By
KESQ News Channel 3

Yes

0

No

3

Yes

No one has commented yet

No

Christopher Watson
1
Christopher Watson

It hasn't been successful in the past here, so I don't see it passing, besides it's still illegal on the Fed level, so you can still get busted no matter what MO says!

Reply
Max DeYoung
0
Max DeYoung

The amendment was written for the marijuana industry. Not for the citizens of Missouri.

Reply
Max DeYoung
Max DeYoung

Before voting tomorrow, I am going to pay my bills, check my 401K, go grocery shopping, and gas up my car. Yup, that ought to do it.

Yes

3

No

18

Yes

Harry Joel
0
Harry Joel

Because there needs to be control on guns and gun sales. Why does KESQ advertise guns of distinction on their evening news, I guess the station owner is fine with 146 murders this year already. This tacky disturbing ad should be removed. Horrible message to allow.

Reply
Shantae Carter
0
Shantae Carter

They should be able to for the pro-gun aspect of it all. Some cities like Prineville or smaller country towns are better at teaching and raising their kids with using the guns right and what they are intended for safely, other cities where they have more shootings should be ban guns to a degree

Reply
Les Adams
0
Les Adams

At the rate people are being gunned down, any municipality should be able to take protective steps. It isn't about feeling safe, it's about being more safe.

Reply
Native Oregonian
Native Oregonian

What's wrong with your logic is that we have something called a US Constitution. The city has no authority to be making up their own rules that go against our civil rights.

No

Marily Badger
3
Marily Badger

Giving gun stores more access to personal and medical info on a potential buyer is long overdue and an excellent way to address the issue. Trampling on gun owner second amendment rights so others can feel safe is just unconstitutional.

Reply
Britney Hamlin
2
Britney Hamlin

Law abiding citizens are protecting their families with their guns. I wouldn't shop anywhere I wasn't allowed to carry. For the exact reason of the Safeway shooting. I can't even imagine getting stuck in a store with a shooter and my kids without protection.

Reply
💛🖤 RAG 💛🖤
2
💛🖤 RAG 💛🖤

Criminals and crazies are the problem NOT guns!!

Reply
Sussie Due
1
Sussie Due

Our system is OK the way it is. Criminals don't use legally purchased guns that can be traced. So tighter regulation is not going to stop the problem.

Reply
Native Oregonian
1
Native Oregonian

They need to focus on local issues, not issues that are already being debated at the state level. They also shouldn't be endorcing measures that are unconstitutional such as 114. The Supreme Court has already ruled that most everything the City is in favor of will not pass constitutional scrutiny.

Reply
Christena
1
Christena

Lets work on where the problem lies, community, mental health, enforcing current regulation. In many cases people had guns illegally, therefore more regulation isn't the answer but helping to enforce current laws.

Reply
Marcus Ainsworth
1
Marcus Ainsworth

The CONSTITUTION clearly states people have the right to keep and bear arms that SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. What new law is a criminal going to all of a sudden decide to follow. Its already illegal to kill people yet people still do it. The heaviest gun controlled cities have the worst gun crime rates

Reply
Ron Johnson
1
Ron Johnson

They say it will be unlawful to carry a loaded gun in public. Does this mean the person with a concealed carry primit have to unload their gun when they leave the house to go out.

Reply
Pat Glandon
1
Pat Glandon

Leave it to Feds/states. Rules we have don't stop criminals and people with other issues. If cities want to do something take a look at mental health issues in their areas.

Reply
Nik Myles
0
Nik Myles

Regulating the law biding citizen from owning or purchasing guns and making the law biding citizen register their weapons will do nothing but regulate law biding citizens. Making the law biding citizen apply for a permit is unconstitutional. The 2nd amendment is my permit. Regulate lawless criminals

Reply
Russell Parker
0
Russell Parker

We already have back ground checks, you have to show photo ID, and be fingerprinted, along with being a resident of this state. It's not a gun problem, it's a people problem. Enforce the laws that we already have, and hold people accountable.

Reply
Kimmy Wasatch
0
Kimmy Wasatch

The federal government is chipping away at our rights, we don't need cities to try to also, Gun control will not help, criminals or people who want to do harm do not follow laws. Make them accountable, enforce drug laws. fund and respect the police, let them do their jab!

Reply
Rick Allen
0
Rick Allen

NO! Gun laws do nothing to help, in fact they create problems. New York's gun free zones are crazy wrong! How can anyone think that a criminal or a mentally ill 20 year old will abide by any law?? Kids that dont know God or a disciplining Father is the problem. Dem D A,s are another problem!

Reply
annie Oakley
0
annie Oakley

Funny how the other states with permit-to-purchase laws have much worse crime than Oregon. But yeah, let's do that...pfff!

Reply
Denise Jensen
0
Denise Jensen

Guns aren't the problem. Video games are the problem band video games not guns

Reply
Jim Hipp
0
Jim Hipp

The guns are already out there. Stupid intervention over 1 unusual event in this area.

Reply
Gabe West
0
Gabe West

Gun regulation won't work and is not the answer

Reply

Yes!

8

No!

5

Yes!

Jeff Sanders
1
Jeff Sanders

Listening to Trump say he knew more about the war in the Middle East than the general's there... I knew he was a lier and a con man, but exactly how far he was willing to go with that is unfathomable.

Reply
Gabe West
Gabe West

He is not a liar the the left wing media are liars

💛🖤 RAG 💛🖤
1
💛🖤 RAG 💛🖤

Definitely NOT Kotek if you want change from the craziness going on!

Reply
Lynn Huntley
0
Lynn Huntley

It has helped me decide whom NOT to vote for. If you don't vote, you have no right to complain about anything. You may not have picked a winner, but at least you tried.

Reply
Ron Johnson
0
Ron Johnson

By the way the questions what I saw was two democrats an a republican

Reply
Gabe West
0
Gabe West

Vote drazan save Oregon and also vote red

Reply

No!

Nik Myles
2
Nik Myles

Nothing they say means anything. Even in debate. What say everything I need to know is what they've done in the past. What is their history.

Reply
Sussie Due
1
Sussie Due

Because I stopped voting years ago, Whats the point? The system is corrupt.

Reply
Rick Allen
1
Rick Allen

NO It is obvious without any debates. If we want to help our economy, bring prices down and close the dangerous border, we all need to vote REPUBLICAN!!! Also Abortion is NOT a contraceptive and it is NOT woman's health, it is Murder period!!! Vote to save innocent little babies!

Reply
Christena
0
Christena

Actions speak louder than words. I want to see how they voted and what they are supporting personally.

Reply
k san
0
k san

I listen to them, but, so far, they have not influenced me to the point of switching my vote.

Reply
Who to Follow
KTVZ

About Mexico

Debates and polls on Mexico from the SquareOffs community. Vote on real questions, see how the public is split, and back your side with a defense.

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT