Did Mueller's testimony change your opinion of the Russia probe?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
882 Votes

Did Mueller's testimony change your opinion of the Russia probe?

Yes, a bit..

2

Not at all..

34

Yes, a bit..

2 Comments
John Haake
1
John Haake

Two things standout. First, is that our democracy is currently under attack and that it has never subsided; Second, is that Trump could/should be brought up on obstruction after he leaves office.

Reply

Not at all..

26 Comments
Betty McKittrick
8
Betty McKittrick

The time has come for the other side of the coin to be investigated. Hillary's uranium deal with Russia, the Clinton Foundation and her emails as they relate to Russian influence on the election..

Reply
Bob A. Bui
Bob A. Bui

You. Are. An. Idiot.

poor turtle
poor turtle

I didn't know how bad the conspiracy theories were getting. Maybe the Russians are the ones egging on the Area 51 raid too who knows

Linda Bolf
Linda Bolf

Amen Betty!

Robert Northrup
5
Robert Northrup

The Obama administration collaborated with Clinton and the DNC to bring down Trump. This is a fact and will be brought to light in due course.

Reply
Wayne Lannen
3
Wayne Lannen

It did not change my opinion, it did expose the corruption of the democrats for all to see, that in itself was a resounding success! This has been nothing more than an attempted coup!

Reply
Steven Huillet
3
Steven Huillet

The Democrats need to let this dead horse die and spend their time and OUR money on things to improve our failing nation.

Reply
Sharon McGrady
3
Sharon McGrady

I think Mueller learned a lot about his report today....

Reply
Peter Coughlin
3
Peter Coughlin

Trump was found not guilty of collusion, period. The Democrats will not accept that and are dragging this on and on and on. All political moves and wasting taxpayers money.

Reply
Bob A. Bui
Bob A. Bui

Wrong. Mueller couldn’t prove Trump’s team conspired with the Russian government. Probably because of all the lying and obstructing. OTOH, Trump would have been indicted if he weren’t president.

donna jo
2
donna jo

I love my President 💙

Reply
Kevin Scoggin
2
Kevin Scoggin

Because it was just another media opportunity to smear the President.

Reply
Bob A. Bui
2
Bob A. Bui

I already knew Trump committed multiple acts of obstruction. Didn’t learn anything new.

Reply
Susan Koerling
2
Susan Koerling

There wasn't and isn't, a doubt in my mind that Trump engaged in collusion and then did all he could to impede a legal investigation. Trump has betrayed his country and mocked the oath he took.

Reply
Bruce Sharp
1
Bruce Sharp

I already knew the info. Trump is a criminal and needs to go.

Reply
Marcia Y
1
Marcia Y

Poor Democrats boo hoo hoo they can't get their way. so they need to just President Trump to do his job leave him alone

Reply
Kristin McKinley
1
Kristin McKinley

The president is an embarrassment to our country. I wish the testimonies today could have been more clear but I respect Mr Mueller and he said all he could. Now it's up to Congress!!

Reply
Rick Lewis
1
Rick Lewis

Trump needs to go to jail

Reply
Briån Tilden
1
Briån Tilden

No wrong doing. #MAGA #TRUMP2020

Reply
Tena Crum
1
Tena Crum

He refused to answer the important questions. They have all been behaving like a bunch of school kids. No credibility. Let's get back to the importance of America

Reply
Rodd Clark
1
Rodd Clark

It was obvious today even the chief investigator didn't know what his investigation was about. I mean really, except an attempt to take down the President. We are so much better off under Trump as Pre

Reply
Johnny Mooney
0
Johnny Mooney

It was a waste of tax payer money and a total scam on the American people

Reply
Bradaigh Holt
0
Bradaigh Holt

He gave his press conference months ago, and AG Barr summarized it. Further testimony was a waste of time from the beginning. Grandstanding on pols part!

Reply
Kathryn Kinney Evans
0
Kathryn Kinney Evans

It pointed out that 45 is guilty of obstruction of justice and this was NOT a Witch hunt!

Reply
John Driscoll
0
John Driscoll

More sound and fury signifying nothing.

Reply
k san
0
k san

It was OBVIOUS Trump is a crook and a con b4 the testimony. Mueller didn't help clarify a thing. A true missed opportunity. No one asked the right ?s, only had him repeat. Very bad preparation!!

Reply
Linda Bolf
0
Linda Bolf

Sad case of, I can't answer that! It was a sad day for him! Stop this craziness😞😧

Reply
Heidi Owen
0
Heidi Owen

Always been a witch hunt! And (Merkley, ..your an idiot. ) The crooked demonrats dislike our President due to he stops they're money-grabbing ! And President Trump is destroying the NWO, Thank God!

Reply
Susan Koerling
Susan Koerling

YOU ARE, not your.

Linda Bolf
Linda Bolf

Amen👍

Bob A. Bui
Bob A. Bui

LOL. “Your” an idiot? Idiot.

GT Thomas
0
GT Thomas

Democrats looked like idiots today. They have hyped false statements for a long time and Mueller did not substantiate them.

Reply
Do you support red light cameras?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
570 Votes

Do you support red light cameras?

Yes

1

No

9

Yes

1 Comment
Loy Helmly
0
Loy Helmly

Increased traffic in Bend has brought more traffic woes. I have personally seen drivers increase speed or run red lights to get through intersections at the last minute. These cameras are needed safety features

Reply

No

9 Comments
John Bryant
0
John Bryant

This will lead to a surveillance state which I am opposed to.

Reply
Peter O'Neill
0
Peter O'Neill

They don’t take into account circumstances that happen all the time. This is why cops don’t always give you a ticket when they see you do it. I do not believe taking the human element out of law enforcement is effective. I do not believe these cameras should be legal.

Reply
Kodiak Malmstrom
0
Kodiak Malmstrom

More Government control. Give us statistics where it saved lives. Charging it's already extremely highly taxed citizens is ridiculous. It issues the owner of the car the citation who may not even be driving. Insurance goes up or is canceled causing low income drivers to drive without insurance.

Reply
Jordan Opdycke
0
Jordan Opdycke

At reed mkt and 3rd its already common to take 3 cycles of light changes to make it through. This will make it so people feel have to go slower contributing to the delay that already exists because of poorly planned infrastructure

Reply
Mt Man
0
Mt Man

All it is going to do overall, is produce more revenue and cause insurance rates of individuals to go up. It takes the real time needed judgment out of the equation by an officer. Clearly, infractions happen over small nuances or when in the dilemma zone. Put a big sign up would have the same effect

Reply
J F
0
J F

These aren't about safety. They are about revenue. And the fact that these 'tickets' are signed off by an 'officer' in another state and don't go on your driving record are proof.

Reply
Melissa Hunter
0
Melissa Hunter

Relying on technology to do the job of officers is not efficient reason for 2.3 million dollar project ,especially. When we just put more officers on the ground the last year.What was the need for more officers?.

Reply
Thomas Barrier iv
0
Thomas Barrier iv

Because it boost the pockets of the city, and takes from the people. It will not reduce car accidents that much, it's only for revenue for the politicians. And it's been proven that they don't work that great. This is just another Ponzi scheme to collect money from the public to line there pockets.

Reply
Judy Corwin
0
Judy Corwin

Try a rotary Peace Poll

Reply
Should the Oregon legislature create Charlie Kirk day?
KTVZ Asked by KTVZ
496 Votes

Should the Oregon legislature create Charlie Kirk day?

Yes

1

No

17

Yes

1 Comment
LuLyn Howard
0
LuLyn Howard

Charlie Kirk was a man of faith and gave his very life for the values I stand for. He was a voice heard around the world

Reply

No

17 Comments
Pat Nelson Wilson
2
Pat Nelson Wilson

He doesn’t deserve it. He is a nobody and spewed hateful rhetoric.

Reply
Janice Adair
2
Janice Adair

He was a racist, white supremacist, and very divisive figure. The political violence that ended his lift is a terrible thing but it’s something he helped foment. This is the most ridiculous idea I can imagine.

Reply
Lisa Alexander
2
Lisa Alexander

He was a racist person who spread hate.

Reply
Jim Terry
1
Jim Terry

Need I really explain

Reply
Jane CommunityMember
1
Jane CommunityMember

I never heard of this guy before he was murdered, but it looks like he had a track record of saying awful things, and fomented the conditions in society that led to his demise. That's very tragic, but there are other people more deserving of a day.

Reply
Robert Spaet
0
Robert Spaet

Irony: “It's worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year, so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights…” Charlie Kirk 2023

Reply
k san
0
k san

Absolutely NOT!! He was a racist extraordinaire and spread divisive speech and ideas.

Reply
Byron Barclay
0
Byron Barclay

Because his MO is actually deceptive & decisive!

Reply
Linda Spaet
0
Linda Spaet

Though this is a tragic incident and a terrible time of violence in our country, Mr. Kirk was not an elected official. We should honor his family and respect them in many ways and I certainly have sympathy for his family. But this does not warrant aday in Oregon devoted to his name or his politics.

Reply
Robert Spaet
0
Robert Spaet

A highly partisan figure in American politics should never be given a day of observance for any reason. It should be acknowledge that violence is not acceptable in any form for any reason, but it should not be honored and given Publicity because of it.

Reply
Alex GERRITY
0
Alex GERRITY

He was not a government figure, and while I don’t condone the violence that took his life, he called on his supporters to bail out others that committed violence against elected government officials.

Reply
Laurie Maholland
0
Laurie Maholland

Mr. Kirk was too controversial and not a hero.

Reply
celeste carico
0
celeste carico

This guy was homophobic, racist, and anti women’s rights. While I think his murder is wrong, he is not a hero. He encouraged hatred towards people he didn’t agree with their lifestyles in his “teachings”. I don’t think Jesus would support him…he preached love for everyone!

Reply
Gerald Wonnacott
0
Gerald Wonnacott

We didn't create a Melissa Hortmann day and she was a good person. Charlie Kirk's rhetoric was about racism, sexism, mysoginism, and divisiveness. He was not a good person and represented everything that was NOT Christian.

Reply
Shannon Gamble
0
Shannon Gamble

Sure! Let's give kudos to the shooter! NOT! What about the 5 officers who just got shot in Pennsylvania? Should we have a day for that too?? Absolutely NOT necessary.

Reply

We use cookies to ensure you get the best possible experience on our website. Learn more OK, GOT IT